Jump to content

October 23-27, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

OK gang, Laura's return was a big hit. She was on Thursday and Friday. Both days were 2.9. This is a full half a rating point higher than the ratings the entire week before. GH earned a 2.4 the previous week. This week those two days were both 2.9. That is a very good and strong improvement.

There is no reason to think that Laura's return will have a huge impact on AMC. It leads into GH and is separated by an hour. Now I did seek that OLTL did better on Friday, marginally better. Too bad they can't break it down by the half hour because i bet OLTL isn't gaining any full-time viewers and is instead picking up folks for the last half hour.

Regardless GH got a good bump. They either sign Genie Francis and change the way they do business or it will be a very short term bump. They only get to pull this stunt once. The end result will either be a contract or viewers so totally pissed off, Fronsie will never get em back. Then again, if his only goal is to survive November then he will be fine.

It doesn't matter too much. I'll watch Luke and Laura then I'm done with it. It's impossible to trust ABC anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's still not a positive thing, IMO. GH always does well for sweeps because they actually try and pimp the show out with these big stunts. For the majority of this appauling year, GH has hit record low after record low and IIRC it's lost over a million viewers this year. Because of this it caused budget cuts which will cause cast members to lose and a good sweeps doesn't make up for that.

GH shouldn't be praised for slinging crap at their fans for the entire year minus sweeps. I've neevr seen a show that blatantly doesn't try or give any regards to what the fans may want. Alexis/Ric/Sam comes to mind..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Many who have watched GH for a long time know that in the next two weeks, they will hang around 2.9/3.0 after that .. PSSH! They'll be back down to a 2.5. WHY? Because all those who tuned in to the show for 3 weeks to see Laura come home will now be tuning out because it will be back to the Jason/Sam/Sonny/Carly show.

At this point, I don't watch anything on this show but Luke/Laura - I mute the rest. I don't much care about anyone else at this point. I want to see a good story for Laura's return and I KNOW I'm not going to get the payoff in the end. This is Guza afterall.

Unless this show can sustain a 3.0 and higher for longer than 3 weeks, this show has not gained or retained any new or existing viewer because of the sweeps stunt they hope would bring them in. Bring them in, perhaps, keep them? Forget it.

Jen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Well, I'd hope so!

Yes, it is. It bumps their averages. It'll bump them for sweeps. PSNS, AMC, OLTL, GL, and DAYS fans will be sitting here every Thursday with our thumbs up our asses saying "I'm sure February Sweeps or X-Mas will be OUR time to shine." Really, we have no guarantee, and GH is laughing all the way to the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think GL has a real chance of beating AMC next week now that the truth about Reva's cancer is out. I happened to catch GL live on Monday since I had the day off and I've been taping it all week and I hadn't watched since last November. I think other lapsed viewers may be tempted to tune back in.

AMC is just painful to sit through these days and getting rid of one of their best actresses, Julia Barr, is just going to make the show less watchable. I hope AMC falls to below a 2.0 if that's what it takes for Frons & McTavish to both be fired!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B)-->

QUOTE(Chris B @ Nov 2 2006, 08:45 PM)

But how are they laughing all the way to the back having lost a million viewers between sweeps periods? I don't see how having good ratings for two months out of a year is a good thing.

Because then they get to go to the advertisers with these numbers, look impressive, and get the big bucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haha so great for GL!!! You go GL. I was so shocked to see the show not second from last for once. Come on ABC fans WATCH GL FOR REVENGE ON ABC!!!

As for DAYS, i'm so disappointed by it's ratings. The show is simply stellar right now, and has been for quite sometime, unlike GH. I expect that by the end of the years things will be looking up for DAYS rating wise after reading some of the spoilers I've been reading.

As for those who are disappointed in Hogan Shaffer; why? The man hasn't even started his own stories yet, he hasn't even been on the show long enough to be disappointed IMO. DAYS is still in transition mode JMHO.

I'm happy for ATWT, though I haven't been that much into it lately. Seeing this soap above GH just makes my day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bored and had some time with Excel so here is the year so far for B&B.

Tried to add some of the bigger stories that corresponded with the points but the captions don't show up very well. So I summarized below.

med_gallery_1264_16_13550.jpg

High Points...

-Ridge leaves Taylor and goes after Brooke. Felicia and her family hold her memorial service.

-Ridge's heart problem. Brooke becomes CEO of Forrester.

-Taylor's trial and Jackie's accident.

Middle points...

-Nick stops Brooke/Ridge marriage. Felicia is Dino's father.

-Brooke/Nick marriage.

-Shane enters. Nick and Bridget sleep together and he confesses.

Low Points...

-Brooke and Nick growing closer. Felicia recovers from cancer.

-More Brooke and Nick. Bridget and Dante become closer.

-Darla's death. Donna comes to town.

*These are just based on the weekly ratings, not opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, no ice cream for the Days' crew this week with the 18-49 demos in 3rd place..... Does Days still hand out ice cream when they reach certain demo targets?

A couple of weeks ago I would have been disappointed in Days' ratings and expressed some worry about it. But like I said last week, I'm not expecting miracles. After all, did Sheffer get good ratings when he was at ATWT? Not really right? His claim to fame was getting the show Emmy recognition, which is what Chris Goutman et al were really after. See the infamous New Yorker profile of Hogan Sheffer "Oakdale Days" for more on that backstory....

I don't expect HS to get stellar ratings this sweeps or Feb sweeps. That's not his style. I think people will come back to the show after hearing word of mouth testimonials from friends and family that Days has gone back to traditional storytelling. Until fans trust Hogan NOT to screw them over, they're not coming back!! Hogie's is an experienced turnaround artist. When Hogie delivers the goods, the core audience will come back to the show. He just has to prove himself first. Now that probably does not mean that Days will EVER reach B&B or Y&R levels, but if he can get a larger audience share that will stick with the show ALL throughout the year instead of during sweeps, then I would declare him a success in my book.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Too many returns, that's when you know a show has run out of ideas and doesn't care anymore.  Zoe annoyed the sh!t out of me most times, but the Kat/Zoe storyline will always be iconic and close to my heart (that's the era I first started following the show in near real-time), and probably the only storyline in 21st century EastEnders that had long-term value for the characters involved during their initial run together. However, after all this time and the writing choice that Zoe never wants to see Kat again, I think that ship has sailed and I don't know that it makes sense to revisit it at this point. 
    • Former EastEnders star Michelle Ryan is reprising her role as Zoe Slater on the BBC soap following an absence of over 20 years.  It’s been reported that Zoe will return to Albert Square later this year and that she’ll take centre stage in a dramatic new storyline involving her family.  The news comes amidst news of other big returns, which include Max Branning (Jake Wood), Tanya Cross (Jo Joyner), Shirley Carter (Linda Henry) and Ben Mitchell (Max Bowden), who will also be back in Walford later in the year.
    • I actually love the new fashion.
    • Admittedly, I was a latecomer to ATWT (first becoming a regular viewer in 2000). But I really liked KMH's Emily. I thought she was a very specific kind of neurotic professional character, and I loved her prickly relationship with MM's Susan. I will say I don't think the show did her any favors after Hal died, stranding her in storylines with several of the show's dullest characters: nu-Paul, nu-Meg, and nu-Dusty. I actually quite liked one of her last major storylines, when she discovered she had a grown-up biological son with Larry named Hunter. But then Hunter just sort of disappeared, and the story fizzled out, which was pretty typical of the late Goutman years. 
    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy