Jump to content

June 19-23, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Nobody has mentioned this so far, but despite DOOL's huge ratings increase, Passions failed to make any gains. As a matter of fact, the show was still at an anemic 1.5 in the households. Even more alarmingly, Passions was at dismal 6th place in the women 18-34 demos. This proves two things: that (1) the executives at NBC were complete idiots (i.e., they made a very idiotic business decision) for not cancelling the show earlier this year and (2) JERk's reputation for being able to attract the young demos is now totally obsolete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Your last line is incorrect. Several articles over the last few months have indicated that networks (daytime and primetime) are looking more at households (all demos combined) to determine advertising rates. If they lose male viewers then that will lower the total household ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What articles? Can you link me to one?

Because the networks don't sell *any* ad time in daytime based on male viewers. None.

Households don't mean anything to advertisers, because they are *always* looking for a specific demographic group. In daytime, it's not men, of any age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the point is, they need to cater to the entire audience. If there's a chart for a group of people, cater to those people.

It makes absolutely NO sense AT ALL for them to keep courting a demo that they fail in repeatedly, while another demo is consistantly tuning in no matter what they put on the screen. Are they that blind!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well advertisers don't really advertise directly to men much at all - primetime or daytime. I have read several articles over the years and another one recently while waiting in the lobby at my Mom's doctor. The article talked about studying the shopping habits of men and what influenced them to buy anything. And they looked at what type things men even buy.

The study said the majority of men still don't do alot of shopping for everyday items. It found that the majority of men still don't even buy their own underwear - they either let their wives get them or wait for birthdays or holidays and get them as gifts. Men for the most part are not influenced by advertising for certain products. They will tend to buy what is on sale as far as household products or what their mother or someone else has always used.

So advertisers daytime and primetime are still after women for the most part, but do gear some things toward men. I mean that is the reason for the sexy advertising and half naked women - they do get men's attentions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since when is 50 considered old lady? I am not an old lady. I spend lots of money. Maybe they should reconsider what they advertise? In the past, men did not do a lot of buying, so the reason they don't cater to them. Maybe those times are changing too.

All they do is recycle the same viewers. They need a hook, to get new viewers. The soap that can do that will be #1.

I'm very disappointed that GH had such a drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Women over 50 aren't old ladies, at least to me anyway. But to advertisers, the 50+ category is looked at as some bad demo b/c of the assumption that b/c retirees are on a fixed income, they're less likely to buy their products.

So basically they're suggesting that women 18-49 are gullible enough to take what an ad says at face value and spend "their husband's money" to buy it. That doesn't happen anymore: women still do the majority of the shopping, but more women are also earning their own money as well and are having a bigger say in the financial responsibilities of the household.

75% of women work outside of the home, which means that the majority of women 18-49 are not home during the daytime when soaps are on! So why are they still the targeted demo? I understand that they're always going to be the demo that advertisers desire, but that also doesn't mean that women over 50 or men should be considered undesirable by soaps.

All I was saying before was that, in the case of ATWT, it tries so hard to find that demo that no longer exists on soaps. Meanwhile, they have two very strong and very neglected demos full of loyal viewers who they should be writing their storylines for; instead, they keep trying to pull in that younger audience, and it's never going to work, and in the mean time, they're pissing off their loyal viewers to the point that they stop watching the show altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I agree about 50+ women. I don't view them as old at all (I don't say that someone's "old" until like 80, but even then, it's all in the individual). The advertisers think of them that way but don't realize that they are the people who are doing the most shopping for P&G things. I mean, I said it a while back in another thread, but I'll say it again. What sounds more realistic, a 25 year old woman buying air sanitizers and carpet cleaners, or a 55 year old woman buying air sanitizers and carpet cleaners?

It just doesn't make any sense to me. They have an audience of Women 50+ and Men who are tuning in now, while they are catering to 18-49. Think of what the numbers would do if they catered to Women 50+ and Men. A while back, there was a thread about soap nicknames and one site called ATWT "the grey-haired soap." When I read that, I thought it sounded cool, and they should take advantage of that reputation. It would be funner than Christmas to see characters like Nancy and Kim and Susan and Lisa in the positions that Jennifer and Emily and Meg and Katie are in right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree that she isn't Dixie or Rosanna and shouldn't be acting like either. I just found it strange that she had a naive Southern character and a wealthy urbane character in the past and didn't experiment with accents before (unless I missed it, correct me if I'm wrong). She used to do improv characters on YouTube. She's probably doing something similar here.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And here I thought I'd never think about Lauren Tewes again after her brief appearance in Twin Peaks Season 3.
    • I may be the single person who does not mind Transatlantic Campy Pamela. I think it perfectly suits this sort of Absolutely Fabulous-esque supporting character she's playing much more than it did when Cady tried weird and often broad stuff at AMC* or Y&R, or later stints at ATWT. She's not Dixie and she's not trying to be. I will freely admit some of the other chances she took at other shows often came off stiff, hammy or downright mortifying (Kelly Andrews, come on down). (* - and I say that as one of the few who was somewhat into Cady trying to make Dixie more cosmopolitan in the Rosanna Cabot mold in mid-2000s AMC, just to liven the character up again)
    • There’s absolutely nothing exciting happening storyline wise but I’m always happy to see the vets on my screen so I’ll take what I can get. It’s also just nice to see them all dressed up in the same room, it always gives classic Y&R vibes. The best part? No Phyllis. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Well now we had Ashley's reaction-and weren't we all gasping when she appeared to hate it-but she was just joking!! She loved it. Now we have to see Abby's reaction, and maybe Mamie could come back to say she loves it. How about Jill via Zoom giving her opinion (she'll love it) and bring in a day player to play Mrs Martinez to say she loves it also... I feel bad to keep dumping on this show (not really) but when the choices they make are so inane, it's the only entertainment value the show has. Let's unpack the Nikki birthday story. So Claire wants to throw her Nana a birthday bash as away of endearing Kyle to Victor. Don't quite get the logic there,but OK. She hires a party planner who makes ridiculous suggestions. Slightly annoyed that Y&R are hiring someone for this role for 5 episodes when we never see doctors, co- workers etc. But OK to that to. With all the talk we are expecting something special. What we get is the Jazz Lounge hideously decorated with some ugly tablecloths and a few tacky decorations. They needed a planner for this? Then the guest list consists of family members (no grandchildren)and a few others. Hardly a party. As usual the costuming is pretty awful. A red and black theme ? And our guest of honor is sporting a do that looks like a cross between Cameron Diaz in Something about Mary and Marie from Roxette. They should have had an intimate dinner and ditched all the fanfare. Would have been way more believable.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Her accent sounds horrible and doesn't fit in line with the character or the dialogue. I was just messing around on YouTube and perusing early Tad and Dixie videos. Notably, Dixie, a resident of Pigeon Hollow, West Virginia, has no discernible accent. i have no idea why she would add a defunct accent to this character now. I want to do an honest survey here. I watch BTG every day and I love it. It's not perfect, but I find it 99% entertaining. For those that find fault with it - what is actually bothering you? I'm not going to argue at all, or disagree with you. I just want to know what others are seeing that I'm not.
    • It's a choice and today, she made it more British than ever before. It's almost like she's making Pamela act like how she thinks she should be acting.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy