Jump to content

DAYS: Vet out!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Meanwhile, it is still the most discussed show on this forum, with people who actually watch daily.

So yeah, your grandma might not be watching, but it is easily consumed on streaming and still brings some joy to my life.  And the platform, the nepotism, nor the popularity excuses what happened to this actress.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Arguable Days has always had a HUGE online presence. Only rivalled by GH and Y&R. I remember up until the early 2010s, Days being one of the most searched tv shows every year on Google. That’s in daytime and primetime! Pretty incredible honestly. I would say, all three of those shows could sustain many years online into the future. 
 

This whole thing is such a mess. I’ve been a diehard Days fan for over 30 years. I have been less than thrilled with the show the last 2 years, just content wise, but this is seriously making me consider never watching again. I fully stand with Arianne on this. The hell she and the other females involved with days had to endure the last decade. Just horrendous. 
 

I think if Corday wants to save the show at this point he needs to step down from producing. He will never sell the show. First of all, who would want it. While I think the show could last many more years under the proper leadership, I don’t think any other production company would see it as viable. Secondly, as little as he cares these days (obviously, it’s his lack of interest that has brought this whole mess on) it’s still his parents show to him. Every interview he does about the shows legacy, it shows he will always feel that way. As much as he’s mismanaged it, it’s part of his family, he’s not giving that away, in the shows life or death. 

Corday should settle with AZ. Give her what she wants, no matter what. Sooner rather than later. He should offer AZ her job back. Give her whatever money she wants as a salary, fire someone if you have to. There are so many useless contract cast members right now. AZ is worth 10 of some of those people. I am sure alot of fans would agree. 
Again, he should step down from producing the show. Obviously as owner, he will always be there and have a say, but hire someone who can take over that position and treat everyone involved with Days with respect and dignity. And honestly produce better quality. And finally, have a permanent HR person involved with the show, that is capable of dealing with these issues. Cause obviously Corday is useless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

THIS, All of this!  And, I've said all along that they should either hire on an on-set PTSD Counselor or arrange something so it would be easy for cast & staff to get counseling that is paid for by the studio. Those people have been traumatized.

And, yes, Ari's acting has been carrying the show. Lots of fans would agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@AbcNbc247 & @JAS0N47  In her press conference, she mentioned being written out for a while after the allegations were made public last summer.  I wonder if she's referencing what we are seeing now with Nicole being in Europe? Or, do you recall Nicole being written out at any other time this past year?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ken's legacy seems as much a burden to him as a privilege. He has never seemed to have much insight or passion for the show beyond it being a generational thing that he feels responsible for.

In a way he acknowledges his limitations by handing over the day to day  running of the show to those he feels have more expertise, but this is often misguided. He then belatedly tries to make changes but the whole thing seems patchwork. See 'The Plan to Save Days'

Compared to his mother  who had a very clear notion of what she wanted the show to be and worked closely with writers and producers.

You don't really get the sense that Ken has a clear vision and is more likely to glom onto whatever current producer or headwriter wants to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I recall his memoir, that was the most interesting part.  It was unexpectedly insightful about working with his mother (who experienced a great deal of trauma), the loss of his brother, and how he became burdened with the production that was never part of how he saw his future.  It is relatable that he is conflicted about his family's business that he writes brought his mother so much grief.  I recommend it to you specifically, because I think you would enjoy it (if you've never read it).

However, none of it, excuses the allegations against him in this case in particular.  His dedication, creativity, and vision (or lack there of), did not cause him to reduce Ms. Zucker's pay twice after she went public with accusations of sexual harassment.  I know that is not your intention, but the conversation seems to meander away from the issues in this case that I feel demand focus and attention from us an audience.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Betty Corday seems to have been really sharp, smart, very knowledgeable about the show, other shows, advertising & also quite able to judge character & hire great people to do specific things since she couldn't do it all herself. 

If you read Ken's book or any articles where he is quoted, he gives a kind of sentimental lip service to the legacy of DAYS. He recalls being with his father when he chose the spinning globe as the logo and motif for ATWT & it sounds like its one of the proudest moments of his life. So maybe he peaked at 5. And we know how sad that is. Also that he stayed in awe of his father. I've been re-reading passages in his book & given what's come to light in the last year and half, it is so depressing I can't read much at a time. What you say about his actions is all true. If he had any kind of self-awareness he would settle this fast & rehire Ari & step down as EP, since he treats it like a figurehead anyway, and hire someone excellent to really be a showrunner. Then he could comfortably continue to be "the owner." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The press conference definitely made it appear as if this is not going to end well for Corday Productions, Ken Corday and Albert Alarr.

NBCUniversal / Peacock need to step-in and say, "Hand it over or you're done," and then it would be over. So, K. Corday wanted to keep what's left of his parents' legacy⏤most of which he has destroyed⏤then I would hand it over for a small compensation he can use to pay-off Zucker without dipping into his own money. And I've long opinioned that Universal Television, which is closely associated with NBC / Peacock should have stepped in to purchase Days of Our Lives (or at least controlling interest) and increase production. Sony Pictures Television is purely distributional so their involvement could be easily severed. It's K. Corday and Corday Productions that poses the problem.

I think transitioning from NBC to Peacock, with little promotion from the network or even the show, was a detriment to its older audience that still watched during their local time slot. I know it was 1pm here. And I remember when NBC changed stations locally here they kept promoting, during each show for a month or two, that if they wanted to continue watching their shows they'd have to follow to the new network station.

Don't know if I would necessarily say that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frankly, I think Betty Corday handed the reins over to her son, because she knew he'd never make it as a professional musician.  She could pass away knowing that, at the very least, Ken and his family would be taken care of.

It's just a shame that a legacy that has stretched across almost six decades potentially could end like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. I don't know if Lenore was ever asked. Then it became a nun. Thanks. I didn't realize it was in 1987. That timeline doesn't make a lot of sense even if she would have had Ed to interact with. If they didn't ask her back in 1989 and she was willing, what a stupid error. The attempts at these feuds, or even the whole families tied together stuff like Maryanne Carruthers, never had any real impact because of how depleted the Bauers felt even by the mid '80s. And instead of expanding them, which would have been common sense, various producers were just too lazy, or too ashamed, and kept bringing on other families, or bringing in too many people at one time and not knowing how to write for them (the Spauldings in the McTavish era - as SOD said at the time, everyone in the family had the same personality).
    • Wasn't there talk of them bringing back Rita as Gus' mother at one point? Or something?
    • I think they are a part of the same family, although Carla was never really scheming for the same reasons, and once her double life was exposed, she stopped. 
    • Rachel/Ada, Mona/Erica, a mother/daughter at LOVING, these are all examples of the Agnes Nixon "troublesome daughter/put upon mother" trope. Are Carla/Sadie by any chance one of the pairs that make up this trope? Another thing that these 2 shows might have in common. OLTL had a very strong thematic approach to socioeconomic differences between groups of people. Class differences. AW at an earlier point had this too but to be clear it was not as much as OLTL. So that is a similarity but marginal.  Besides that, I see no other comparable things. Paul Rauch was a very different EP at different shows. Oh, I've thought of one more thing. Using actors from the Broadway stage.  But, realistically that was something all of the NY shows had in common. So I don't think it has any uniqueness between AW & OLTL.  
    • When you look at the period between Sweeps, it's as if they tried to maintain a kind of pace where they had a lot of plates spinning in the air & on their fingertips & the whole goal was nothing but to not drop any of those plates. A version of spinning one's wheels. They're not getting anywhere but they give the appearance of a whole lot of activity. I believe it's all about this appearance. At moments they accidentally hit a chord & something resonates but it is a false event.
    • He found the hidden camera and removed the card 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m not speculating anything, but I admit, I’m getting a little worried about James Reynolds. 
    • I feel like this is what they're doing by creating lots of storylines but their biggest weakness for years is the inability to properly pace these stories and give resolution. A good example now would be the Gio story which has been simmering for months with very little movement. I went from not caring to being invested to not caring again because of how long it's taking for the secret to be revealed. One story like that would be fine but it seems like everything moves at this snails pace on GH. They need to do a better job of rotating the stories so everything isn't in that same treading water phase.
    • However, those of us who watch DAYS have been spoiled. On Peacock there are no preemptions. Not for anything & not in or about any show.  I read somewhere that we Baby Boomers in a way invented instant gratification but then we realized that it was not fast enough.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy