Jump to content

NBC Daytime


Jdee43

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I wish youtube had the promo that aired days before Generations premiered.. because the promo had fast paced music, snippets of the cast arguing, acting mysterious and seductive.  It made the show look enticing, but when it premiered.. I remember my 19 year old aunt watching it when I was very little and she said it was too boring.  A half hour soap should not be boring.

I actually think Ryan's Hope had great openings since it was about the Ryan family living in NYC.  You saw scenes of the Ryan's and friends in various sites throughout NYC with a catchy theme song.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 323
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Respectfully disagree here, we are talking about coming out of the Reagan era of excess so a scaling back on the mega wealthy business people might have been more appropriate.

And a half hour soap neither had the budget or scope to realistically depict that kind of enterprise. So I would have focused on something more relatable-a business that could be used as a backdrop when necessary whose ins and outs we could understand.

So yes to the cosmetics idea if it were depicted as a boutique operation.

Or maybe a real estate/property business?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Overall, it is remarkable that Generations is remembered as a soap that was more diverse and inclusive in order to attract a Black audience.  Yet, while it was re-run on BET, there were no Black creative staff people hired in the production or development.  In fact, when ratings were lagging, the network attempted to solve the issue by increasing the number of white characters. No new Black characters were introduced in the final six months, whereas the white family got at least two new family members.  And rather than hiring a Black producer or head writer, they went with Jorn Winther.

While we shouldn't judge it based on the ideals of today, one assumes that a network marketing a show toward a Black audience without hiring any Black creative in positions of power would be frowned upon in 2023

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In response to @danfling 's question

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-03-26-ca-235-story.html

NBC’s motives in creating “Generations” were not entirely altruistic, however.

Statistics compiled by Nielsen Media Research show that blacks watch an average of 55% more daytime television than other groups. And, before “Generations,” NBC’s daytime programming garnered fewer black viewers than the other networks’.

“Generations” ranks about equal with the other networks’ major soaps in terms of audience composition, with 21% of its audience black. It leads NBC’s other soaps: Just 11% of “Days of Our Lives” viewers are black, 12% of “Another World” viewers and 16% of “Santa Barbara” viewers.

“One of the reasons the networks have been running more black shows and more black characters is (that) blacks disproportionately don’t have access to VCRs and cable television and satellites,” said Horne, the UCSB professor.

That means they are more likely than whites to watch network advertising and buy the products offered for sale, Horne said.

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My notes on Sally Sussman as guest on THE CHAT podcast, week of 1-20-23.

She was a fan first & she turned her hobby into a career. The first soap she watched was EON. Then The Secret Storm. Next, AMC, where she began with the first day. She also began watching Y&R on its first day. Bill Bell was always her hero. When she was 26 she was in a CBS Writer's Development thing & they were assigned to write a bible for one of the shows on the air. She wrote 4 stories for Y&R. Bill Bell loved them & loved her & 2 of those stories made it on the air. Right off he asked her what she liked about the show & also what she did not like. She told him. He agreed with what irked her. Good writers do not mind criticism because it's not personal. Too many today take it personally. Make the audience want more. Make them want to tune in tomorrow. It is about the journey not the pay-off. Bill Bell learned that from Ted Corday & Irna Phillips & she learned it from Bell. This was in 1982 & she got along fabulously with Kay, Jack, Elizabeth Harrower, etc. But, it happened to be a bad time for the show. The show had gone from a half hour to an hour.

At some point CBS decided they were the creative arm, which they were not, and Sony just went along with whatever. That Writing Team, headed by Kay Alden who was Bill's pick to write the show after him, all were fired & the show was handed over to Lynn Marie Latham. When she's been back, which was two times, she's been micromanaged down to the second.

Things she did: Devon & Hillary; Devon getting stopped by a cop, etc.; "Teriah" initial attraction & first kiss. CBS reaction apoplexy!! Y&R has an older skewing audience & CBS PTB worry about doing anything controversial.

Now: They have no money. There is no money for sets. They will not move sets, change sets. Extremely difficult for Writers to juggle storylines with the sets being the way they are.

What were her favorite characters that she created? Lauren. The entire cast of Generations. At DAYS Mike & Carrie as a couple.

What stories were hers? Deena home to the Abbotts, Buried Alive, Stalker, 1984 when Eve poisoned …, Jill's heart attack although she didn't get to do it as she'd have liked because Jess doesn't want to come in much. At DAYS Sami's execution. She said she saw a little moment between Christie & Roark that gave her the idea of putting them together. She said it is imperative that writers watch the show as that is the only way you will see things like that. She respects Reilly but personally doesn't like the scifi stuff in soaps. She also said she did an early sexual harassment story. Spyder Games had a fixed ending set from the get-go & that was a challenge to be writing with that in place. At GH Michele Val Jean & Elizabeth Korte had been named co-HWs & Wendy Riche asked her to consult. She did for 13 weeks only because Jill wanted to provide the writers with outlines that they would write to. Never heard of that much less did it. Outta there as soon as that 13 week cycle was up.

About Emmy reels. When you do 250 shows per year not every show is going to be a winner. But, you hope 100 are. And, you definitely should be able to find 2 for an Emmy reel.

About DAYS streaming on Peacock. Bravo to them. This may be a blessing in disguise. Be interesting to see if the rest go that way. GH will have an easier time of it than Y&R. Migrating to streaming from the network broadcast way. Y&R might have challenges going to Paramount Plus. Also older audience might react with fear that they'd have to go out & buy an Apple TV. Probably NBC to NBC UNIversal to Peacock was easier.

She doesn't watch the show. She does read fan boards. They are a barometer. Watching & loving it - great. Watching & hating it - still great. Not watching - not great. Ffing Ffing Ffing - not great. The show "meh'' - not great.

Advice to current & aspiring writers: Really be inside your characters & be true to them. Be daring & bold. Think big picture, whole cast, balance storyline & couples & suspense versus romance. KNOW your ending. Know who the killer is. DO NOT WING IT.

Problems shows have simply because they've been on the air so long: Everyone's related. All inner-connected. Complacency. Scifi stuff. Boring doppelgangers. Pandering to an audience is terrible. Dumbing down is terrible.

Oh, I forgot two important things: Soap people are the hardest working & the best people of all people! And, the job of Headwriter is harder than any other job anywhere, anytime!

One more thing that I forgot when JFP was hired as EP she wanted to bring on Megan McTavish! One #SoapKiller wanting to hire another.

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know she is a controversial figure in this discussion, but it would be interesting to know if Sally Sussman's initial pitch for Generations focused on diversity. Or if that was what part of the NBC's notes on the pitch, and she adjusted her vision in order to get the show developed?  I assume we'll never find out the truth because as the saying goes, 'success has many fathers, but failure is an orphan'.  And in TV, nobody wants to be an orphan.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

 

Controversial take here, but I think black viewers played a big part in NBC's primetime comeback during the second half of the 1980s and NBC was hoping for those viewers to carry over to their daytime line up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also, NBC and P&G tried to integrate Another World in the early 80s with black characters with no real jump in the ratings. You had Quinn, Thomasina, and Ed Harding. The Morgan family- Bob, Henrietta, RJ, and Mary Sue.  Also, Roy Bingham and Lily Mason along with other minor black characters on the show. In 1982-83, there were 9 black characters involved in storylines out of approximately 30 contract players.  If it didn’t work in 1982, I wonder how NBC thought it would work in 1989?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With every thing that was going on with the show at the time, I don't think you could blame the Black characters for the lack of a ratings jump. Had some of those characters stayed around and viewers got more attached and interested then it might have followed through in the ratings. But only Quinn and Thomasina had any sort of staying power and they were eventually dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  It's one thing to cast more diverse actors; it's another to write well for them.  And I don't think AW was writing well for anyone, black OR white, during that period.

Same goes for GENERATIONS.  You can't just expect African-American viewers to watch a show and keep it on the air because we "see ourselves" on the screen.  The writing has to be there, too, or else we're not gonna bother.  

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I disagree. I believe in general that if soap fans are into the characters, they will tolerate a good deal of bad writing. I think that the combination of the actor they like with the characterization that they are fond of that that is the glue that will cause fans to stick it out through some pretty rough periods.

Whereas good writing that is missing that actor/character combo will not keep people watching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
    • It's pilots like "Hurricane Sam" and "Anything for Love" that makes me so afraid to write professionally, because, my God, what if I actually tried and came up with something just as awful, if not worse (if that's even possible)?
    • JANUARY 1974 SPECIALS ADDED... Here are the January 1974 specials which have been added to the yearly list on page 76:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy