Jump to content

General Hospital: November 2022 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Edward's Will stated all his LIVING GRANDCHILDREN were heirs, AJ wasn't mentioned as he was believed dead at the time Edward's Will was Made, however the living grandchildren clause allowed him to inherit Stock as well, since Drew is Jason's Twin and Edward's Grandchild he could claim the same as his other granchildren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Yeah On One Side i felt like it would be nice for her to have an interesting storyline but i was relieved when that was scrapped, Poor Felicia had suffered enough on Ryan's account as it is.

Me Too! Seeing The Vets Doing something is always interesting, not sure How To feel about Anna and Valentin though, Agreed on The Q. Mansion, Miss Celia Would Be Appalled, Alley is a deloight to watch as usual, Kudos for GH knowing how to use after B&B wasted her for sooo long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know I'm beating a dead horse, but how does one receive an inheritance after probate?  Edward had been dead for years before Drew appeared, after the property from a will has been dispersed you can't go back and redistribute it.

It's like if they found the love child of JFK and Marilyn Monroe and then tried to tell Carolyn Kennedy to give up some of her cash that she inherited six decades ago.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I don't know how it would work on GH with people coming back from the dead.  I don't think logic can apply in this scenario since it really isn't something that would happen very often or ever in real life lol.  Again I only know what the people that handle my 401k tell me about stocks, but is it possible the public trading of the shares just gets smaller instead?

Since Edward said all LIVING grandkids it is a bit different than Caroline Kennedy having to give up money because JFK specifically named her in his will not any living children that might pop up.  So if baby Monroe Kennedy appeared Caroline wouldn't have to give up anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

BTW, I am really enjoying Alexis's turn as a journalist. It's fun to see her be the voice of logic, I like that they aren't ignoring that she went to jail, and I appreciate when they give women of a certain age a story that doesn't always focus on romance.  I also enjoy that it allows Alexis to be high and mighty even when there are no court cases to fight.

Now, why Drew and Valentine get an inheritance and Alexis doesn't is whole other issue, but I promise to let it go soon.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the Alexis journalist thing would be nonsensical but it oddly really works, unlike a lot of the show. It makes sense Alexis would've been long-disbarred by now too, so it helps showing actual consequences for her choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking about that recently when Kin Shriner posted on twitter something cryptic about his time on GH, because that scene just screamed - "I've cleaned out my dressing room and I'm never coming back!"  only to be followed by a phone call a few years later - "Oh, you want me back on recurring for a quarter of my previous salary, after I haven't been working for the past nine months?  I'll be right over"

 

On a completely separate note; what's the deal with Selina Wu?  Is she evil because she's trying to lure Cody and Gladys into loosing their money through poker?  Or is she cool because she helped Holly against Victor?  I don't know how we're supposed to feel about her?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I might be remembering this wrong so forgive me if that's the case...I thought the plan was for Michael to fold Aurora Media into ELQ. Jake is the head of it still so he would still be the head and in that case, but that with Carly's money would allow them to have a 1 percent controlling interest over Valentin. And I want to say Michael planned on him and Drew to be co-CEO, thus outranking Ned so they had to give him a COO position with no power whatsoever...which Ned has under Valentin. And Ned got the sour grapes over it. 

 

In terms of the will...I think it's a matter of the wording of the will and the fact that the only person who could change it to make it legal and more specific is now deceased. The wiggle room in the wording is why we keep getting stories about lost Quartermanies who due to the wording in the will can actually claim an inheritance and also why every time a character has a Q baby, the stock shares adjust to include that new baby. It's also why Austin looking for a change in the will was such a storyline. The fact that Edward made changes that specifically in the wording INCLUDES a new person. In this case, Jimmy Lee Holt's branch of the family which in the old will I assume was specifically mentioned to not get anything. 

 

At least that's what I've always thought.

You said it soooo much better than I did. I could not remember the wording, but felt it was in the wording. Thank you.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank You! It was easy I saw the Reading of Edward's Will Just a few days ago it was fresh on my mind I was on a Skye Bing Watching, God I Miss When we had a bunch o Qs Fighting at the Mansion, my fave set together with Old Windermere, I Wish They could've bring more real Qs Instead of made up ones, Celia with Maybe A Kid, Skye and Lila Rae I don't know

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
    • Josh continues to try and milk Abbott/Newman rivalry. First it was Billy/Victoria, then Kyle/Summer, then Noah/Allie (that worked out well) and now Kyle/Claire. Do we have any inkling when Billy Flynn will arrive and who he will play? I'm sure Cole's illness will mostly play offscreen. What's in store for Nick and Sharon? Is it time to put them back together? I can't see any other romantic options. Nick has no children on the canvas to play off, as Christian is never seen. Sharon has only Mariah onscreen.
    • I would appreciate (if they're not coming), for future scripts to refer to them by their iconic hairdos.  For example, if Hope needs to call Chelsea because Bo has Sepsis, I'd like Shawn-D to say, "My Mom called Chelsea (the one with the sassy short black hair) for an update." Also, new rule, if Melanie does return, she needs to dye her hair back to red.  I googled who she was five times during Victor's funeral.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Broderick, thank you for all of the info [I edited for space]. I am so grateful for everyone filling in the blanks for me. I suspected the Nora/Eliot scene was very important and it was setting something up but I didn't know what. Can't wait to see it play out. The two actors had such a great back and forth. I should have made the Paige/Patty Hearst connection. I thought Paige was in love with Brian from the first episode I watched but it seemed as if they were brother and sister. Steve kept being affectionate with her so I assumed he was the love interest. Then she was affectionate with someone else and well..she's a very busy woman. I can't wait to see Frances Fisher show up. (I'm trying to be vague because I don't know what would be a spoiler in this storyline) Now it makes sense why Draper would be upset. I didn't get the whole background of why he didn't go to NY. I'm a sucker for good acting, so I might still side with April and Margo, if the writers don't give Draper more to do besides yelling.  He had more chemistry with Logan, but I know that's not happening.  Something else I noticed: the show really takes care with even the smallest parts. The acting is superb. Too often, I noticed on older soaps they don't take care with the recurring or day players (Ryan's Hope was so bad with this that I couldn't make it through some episodes). It's only been six episodes, but so far, the casting department was spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy