Jump to content

LATEST RATINGS: May 18-22, 2020


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members


If they rush back into production and treat it as “business as usual” then I think those viewers are gone. Instead, I’d plot season premieres for the shows, PROMOTE their returns and make an event out of it. If they come back with the same ole then they’re screwing themselves. Plus I would just film as much as I can and try to get at least 2-3 months ahead just in case we have to shut down again. I wouldn’t go back to air with 2-3 weeks in the can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you on this. If they think they can just pick up whenever production starts rolling and start airing when they have episodes ready and expect those that have already tuned out to come back without doing some major promo - it's just not going to happen.  

Definitely worrisome. I will say that unlike during O.J. viewers are aware that there is a hiatus of sorts and that soaps are airing repeats and that there's going to be an extended break. While during, O.J. the impression I've gotten from reading about its impact on soaps and from that documentary on ABC is that viewers just didn't know when to tune in, whether their show would get preempted that day and if they did know their show would often be scheduled at some odd hour in the middle of the night so they had to program their vcrs. I wonder if those viewers lost all those stories that were played out those months since it seems like networks were still trying to air the soaps just not at very convenient times. 

Edited by GLATWT88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The big thing with OJ wasn’t just the daily disruption.  It was that an entire new kind of programming replaced it and was also airing 5 days a week.  Never before had cable or a 24 hour news cycle done so much to disrupt viewing habits.

 

Talk shows got more lurid and trashy.  Court TV covered real life crimes all day long.  The Real World was really taking off on MTV, where young viewers were getting their soap fix with what would become kind of a template for modern reality tv.  OJ leads into the Jenny Jones crime and trials, followed quickly by President Clinton on television saying he did not have sexual relations with that woman.

 

Now the question to me is if these folks won’t come back because they finally broke the habit, not so much have discovered all this new content which isn’t as big a revolution as it was then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Right, I feel like the OJ Simpson trial was a catalyst for the decline of soap opera viewers. While some soaps had witnessed declines in viewership in the early 90s, the declines were modest. On the other hand, some soaps actually had grown or shown stable viewership, such as AMC, BB and Y&R. Decline in viewership at the time also correlates to the decline in the traditional audience (housewives) as younger women were forgoing  traditional roles and joining the ever expanding married female workforce (similarly, single parent households increased and both parents working increased during the same time and continue to do so). It's not surprising daytime court shows also increased post-OJ, Judge Judy being a big one that premiered in 1996. The landscape of daytime also made changes in the late 80s and 90s which were already reflecting the desire for "realtiy" with sensational talk shows popping up across the networks and growing throughout most of the 90s. While traditional viewership for soaps were slightly down pre-OJ there's no real way to know how many people were still recording their soaps - there's some information floating around but no concrete data that would help understand what viewership was like and part of it stems from networks not being concerned with VCR viewership because most viewers weren't viewing commercials anyway. Also, the increase of cable in households and the increase of original programming on cable also dipped into soap viewership. One of my other theories is that when soaps started targeting younger demos they ended up neglecting their core, older audience. That's the audience who eventually passes down soap viewing to the younger generations. When I was reading everyone's response on how they got into soaps, the overwhelming majority said they started watching with mom or another family member(s).

 

While I believe that daytime soap operas would have experienced decreased viewership regardless, I believe the OJ trial definitely expedited that decrease and forced away many viewers. Bad choices to bring younger viewers after the declines then drove away dedicated viewers. With the growth in cable programming, and now streaming programming, changing work habits, internet, smartphones, a decline was inevitable. Look at primetime ratings for the same networks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

July/August. Once California gives them the go ahead they’ll have to find out what actors are willing to work and who they can’t use. Plus they’ll have to reassemble the writing staff and write new or edited scripts and also they’ll have to clean the studio and those old sets. It won’t be an easy undertaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think this could be the end.  Y&R got renewed for a few years but I don't think viewers will be back after this.  I'm shocked at how well Y&R is doing with the younger demo with repeats.  It doesn't make logical sense.  

Wouldn't the writers just keep writing anyway?  Do they actually go to the studio anyway or do they work virtually?  I'd think they'd be working from home alot anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • First, Martin vs Ted. Now Kat vs Ted.    
    • Team Silk Press Sheila!  I hope she topples the mighty Duprees because that family has it coming. The spoilers that were posted last week for today's episode had Ashley/Derek mentioned, but as we saw, they weren't featured at all.  Was that part of the spoiler a mistake, or did the show edit them out.    Nice to see a bit of Vanessa/Doug.. and I'm fascinated by Vanessa's perspective in regards to Dani/Bill's marriage vs Nicole/Ted's marriage. While this was a good episode, it does highlight that the show is lacking non-Dupree related characters.  
    • Cry me a river! lol. Oh, Silk-Press.     Awwww no good night for Dani and Andre.    Uh oh. They are at the house. It's dark and Mona did let everyone off for the night...    
    • I just hate this dress. Bottom picture. 
    • I do wonder if Bill will suffer any consequences from his part in all of this.   Ambyr is such a star. I love it when actors react in the background.    Kat, this ain't about you!   Go 'head, Martin vs Ted.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • "On a shallow note" Martin gets all the booty from his Daddy, Ted is just as stacked as his son, LOL! I had to say it.
    • Lol! If Kat is going to do one thing, it's going to be give shade.   And of course, the Duprees would get into formation and team up. Sadly, I don't think they have anything on Silk Press Sheila.    Poor Nicole.   But loving it. I know I'm invested besides I'm seriously side-eying Vanessa/Doug cuz I want to get to the meat. And I love that every single beat is getting played.    Oooo Nosy Nurse!!!   OOOOHHHH so Silk Press Sheila and Nicole were preggers at the same time. And HA!!! The lawyer WAS Bill!  The acting is superb. Silk Press Sheila even toyed with Martin a little bit.   Ooooomg! Eva revealed.   Wait! Is it food posioning for Vanessa or is she with child?
    • Well, if you add that one caveat, oddly, it disqualifies Renee. Because she is one person who was both the planner (if you will) and also the "evil" revealer. Weird but that is THE difference.  And it's the only difference. But, sure, I think those words make it unique. THE REVEALER CONVINCES HER TARGET TO HOST THE EVENT. Right?  Well, if we nitpick The Revealer used her secret agent to convince their target to do this shindig. Yes. That's it. Because Leslie/Sheila/Sherry/Dana/Leslie/Mom didn't do it by herself. She HAD to have Eva doing her part.  Okay, run with that.  And, why not discuss it here? It's topical.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy