Jump to content

Unpopular Opinions


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Clara, Lu, and Em, a radio show credited with precipitating the creation of the soap opera genre, began on WGN in Chicago, way back in 1930. It was a series about three housewives and their involvement with their friends' and families' lives.

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Its popularity compelled the sponsors to ask Irna Phillips to create a daily radio drama "about a family," which she did: Painted Dreams, which began on October 20, 1930. And voila: the soaps were born.

 

By the time ANY of today's remaining four soap operas premiered, the  genre had been thriving for more than 30 years. When William J. Bell created B&B in 1987, TGL had been marching along for a whopping five decades. So I would contest the notion that  creators of modern soaps did not intend for their creations to last this long. If ANY genre can be expected to have a long, long life, it's a successful soap. Nixon, Phillips, Bell and their ilk would have known this better than anyone.

 

I can't agree that anniversaries and multi-generational storytelling were introduced in the 1980s, either. AW celebrated its 10th anniversary in 1974, with a special 60-minute episode. And from the very beginning, soaps featured multiple generations of families, intertwined. Viewers loved to see the wise, elderly matriarchs and patriarchs like Papa Bauer and Grandpa Hughes dishing out loving advice to the younger generations. Indeed, when the soaps started to hack away at the "old folks" in the 1980s, viewers were LIVID.

 

I do agree that soaps' halcyon years were the 1970s. There were many new shows introduced, a variety of different and relevant stories told. Unfortunately, as the decades passed, TPTB started dumbing down the shows, turning them into bland, predictable pablum in order not to alienate anyone in the audience. The result is as you say: tiresome stories repeated ad nauseum, with nothing new, daring, or intelligent offered. So we are stuck with bland pablum and endlessly regurgitated plots dished out by shows most intent on appealing to fickle teens. No wonder the soaps are dying. Primetime TV is filled with serialized and soapy shows, with higher budgets, better writing, and themes and styles better suited to modern audiences. No one has loved daytime soaps more than me, but if I have to choose between watching today's GH or Downton Abbey, or between today's Days or This is Us...well, there's really no choice.

 

I also think you are right when you say that the networks should simply create new shows based on the themes they want to present, rather than trying to twist existing soaps into entirely new, unfamiliar  molds. It's General Hospital, not Mobster Central. Destroying a soap's identity and foundation and turning it into something it's not, simply kills the show. I would love to watch the "real" General Hospital or the "real" Young and the Restless, but...they are no longer there. The bastardized versions we see in 2018 are merely pallid imposters.

 

As for the adherence to history that many fans demand, I think it's important. Viewers want this stability more and more as TIIC decimate the shows more and more. Each soap opera is an institution unto itself, and if new producers and writers take over, it's their responsibility to study the history and keep the characters recognizable. One thing I always appreciated about Claire Labine, Agnes Nixon, Pat Falken Smith, Douglas Marland and Harding Lemay: when they assumed the reigns of new soaps, they thoroughly studied up on everything, and would effectively weave the past into their current storylines. Viewers responded very favorably. Compare that to the likes of Charles Pratt, whose disinterest in being true to a show's legacy was obvious.

 

I wouldn't say that the viewers' craving for solid continuity of character, and our demand for history to be respected, are the factors killing the genre. I would say that TPTB's REFUSAL or INABILITY to give us what we want to watch, to give us what made soaps so popular to begin with, is what's killing the shows. As TPTB continue fail;ng to learn this message, our shows continue to die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Every credible account has confirmed what you are saying. Many longtime soap actors have been asked to accept significant cuts to their guarantees since daytime's budgets started plummeting, and many have balked at the idea. Long gone are the days when TPTB would willingly guarantee stars like George Reinholt three appearances a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The friend and scene partner of Heather Tom had their contract up for renewal after and when she quit to the shock of Y&R and Sony, this actor got everything they wanted in negotiations because they didn’t want to lose two high profile actors in succession. 

Most soap actors (especially newbies) have a one or two episode guarantee. The new contracts are horrific based on what the job entails. If they were all half hours, I don’t think most actors would mind because you’d have much more free time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


She left because they cut her pay and by extension her airtime. Her departure happened right as Y&R (and every other soap) was experiencing huge budget cuts. That's why Nick (and Sharon) was/were elevated to Y&R's primary leads in the aftermath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes, the networks will keep the guarantees to an absolute minimum because it benefits themselves. Their troubles arise when enormously popular actors with at least perceived drawing power refuse cuts to their number of guaranteed appearances. Sometimes, the actors win and continue with high guarantees, sometimes they end up leaving the shows.

 

Way back in 1966, Joan Bennett had a three-appearance-a-week guarantee at $333.33 per episode for Dark Shadows. Imagine a $52,000.00 yearly from the 1960s adjusted to 2018 dollars. Inflation indexes say it would be $403,121.01. I could live on that!

 

In 1975, superstars George Reinholt and Jacquie Courtney had three-appearances-a-week guarantees which netted them $70,000.00 a year from AW. That's $332,498.65 in today's dollars. I could live on that too.  

 

Knowing that Kim Zimmer, Martha Byrne, and other high-profile actresses had been asked to take guarantee cuts, I wonder what the most popular actors of today are guaranteed. Probably more than untested newbies, but I doubt all the stars are getting three-appearance-a-week contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Except back then the show was still signing people to good deals.  They, like many PTB at all the shows at that time were almost all devaluing the importance of the women on their shows and letting the men get better deals, better story, and input.

 

GH was one of the worst, but they were almost all doing it.  I think this more than almost anything is what caused the precipitous decline in the genre over the four or five years in the early 2000’s that resulted in ATWT, GL, OLTL and AMC being cancelled.  The lack of focus on stories that women relate to and characters they like to see drove those numbers down.

 

I can think of popular women on each show that quit because of being undervalued.  Even if I didn’t particularly like the performers, plenty of people did.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 Actually, good point. When costs are being slashed and guarantees being cut, it's often the top-ranked males who fare the best. That's the way so many businesses tend to work: the powerful men get the perks and everybody else in the corporation bears the burden. Actresses like Martha Byrne and Kim Zimmer get hardballed in negotiations. To be fair, it's not ONLY women. Eric Braedon and Tony Geary have spoken openly about being asked to cap their salary expectations. TGL axed Jerry ver Dorn (!!!) even though he was the show's de facto cornerstone, and GH axed Brad Maule and Stuart Damon. But I'll bet the pet men like Mo Bernard and Steve Burton have pretty sweet deals. The men seem to fare better, overall, than even the most popular actresses. Look at the most recent, egregious example: poor Genie Francis, who is more valuable to that show than any of the men, IMHO, but who just got the shaft.

 

it AMAZES me that for decades, the soaps have refused (or at least failed) to give the audiences the kind of stories and characters  they want to see; the kind of material that made soaps popular to begin with and kept them so beloved for decades. I want to watch the shows, I really do, but they are not offering me anything substantial to lure me back in. When was the last time GH was truly memorable, quality television: 1996, under Claire Labine? Y&R: 2006, under Kay Alden? Days: 1982, under Pat Falken Smith? Soap fans are loyal and tenacious...but only for so long. If the PTB do not recognize the importance of keeping our most beloved actresses and characters on screen, and if they let them slip away over cost issues, there will go viewers' last real reason to tune in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes. I did a lot of pondering on this a few years ago when GL, ATWT, AMC, and OLTL drew to a close. We were mourning shows that had been on the air 40+ years, which was a huge a loss, but they had been on the air 40+ years. Did we expect them to last forever and ever, amen? TV shows with low ratings get cancelled. A TV show that started hot and fizzled after two seasons goes down in history mostly as a flop; a TV show that began on radio and was broadcast for 72 years meeting its end on television is not a flop by any definition of the term at all.
 

 

Thirty years maybe, but 40 years...50? No soap that has reached its 50th anniversary reached it in "good" condition, and that includes Coronation Street. Every single one of them were shells of their former selves upon their golden anniversaries, and even if we include GL's radio run and look at 1987, it was certainly not the show that Irna had created anymore by then (but then again, it stopped following its original premise after 10 years on radio). None of these soaps have benefited from having lifespans longer than many people's.

 

 

If Papa Bauer or Grandpa Hughes doling out guidance to their families is what people were asking for, then that would be awesome, and I'd be right there with them, because that element was sorely missed in the waning years of soaps (it's easier for me to talk about the genre as if its wholly gone because really what's the point?), but I'm not sure that's the "multi-generational storytelling" that many people are pining for, though. Today, there are people who would wonder why 75-year-old Papa doesn't have a love interest or has a storyline all his own. I've read with my own eyes on this very forum pleas for characters like ATWT's Bob, Lisa, and KIm to have their own stories when they were in their 70s. OBVIOUSLY, those characters, especially Lisa, deserved wayyyyy more than what they received as that show neared its end, but Irna Phillips NEVER centered a whole storyline around septuagenarians, and neither did Agnes or Bill.

What was AW's 10th anniversary episode like? I can only assume it wasn't the big huge clip/return fest that anniversary shows became starting in 1986 (and I LOVE those shows as much as anyone else!). I'm truly feeling j swift's point, though, in that the 1970s were the last decade in which writers could just write and not be held accountable for satisfying all of the sentimental demands of the audience that have only risen with time. The sentimental demands simply were not as high then because, in 1976, the average soap had been on the air for only 13 years.

 


I have to reiterate my last point here, though. Agnes never joined the writing staff of a soap that was over 10 years old unless she'd created it herself. I know she started at GL in 1958, but you can hardly consider the pre-Bauer years to be the same show at all. She joined AW when it was a year old. It probably took her one afternoon to become acquainted with every character and storyline that had taken place. Harding Lemay's best work was at AW, which hadn't hit 10 years old when he took over. The list goes on and on. None of them were ever expected to incorporate 30-year-old storylines into their writing. Even Marland's heralded use of history on ATWT went back maybe 15-20 years tops.

I think we'd be less likely to want these shows to go on and on if we truly believed in a proper life after death for them. As it stands, there is none besides YouTube posts derived from VHS recordings. If we could log onto a Netflix or Amazon Prime and suddenly have every episode of the very best years of these shows available to us in pristine condition, then we'd have no use for them in their weakened, damaged state. Let's be real, the only reason why we want them to continue is in hopes of them being as good as what they once were. If we could still regularly watch what they once were, we wouldn't need them anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I was responding to the original contention that writers never expected their shows to last this long. There's no reason to believe that the scribes would NOT expect to see their soaps, if successful, surviving for decades...because soaps do so now, and did so back when the writers created the four soaps still on the air. I agree that virtually all of the ones that have lived beyond a certain number of decades have stumbled, but that is the fault of recycled hacks being rotated from show to show, and the inability/disinterest of TPTB in producing good product. TGL's breathtaking resurgence in quality and in audience approval in the early 1990s, proves that even when an old warhorse looks likes it should be put out to pasture, even past 50 years old, it can be revived and gallop to the head of the pack.

 

Incompetence, cheapness on the part of P&G, and general disinterest on the part of the suits killed TGL, not its age.

 

"If Papa Bauer or Grandpa Hughes doling out guidance to their families is what people were asking for, then that would be awesome, and I'd be right there with them, because that element was sorely missed in the waning years of soaps (it's easier for me to talk about the genre as if its wholly gone because really what's the point?), but I'm not sure that's the "multi-generational storytelling" that many people are pining for, though. Today, there are people who would wonder why 75-year-old Papa doesn't have a love interest or has a storyline all his own. I've read with my own eyes on this very forum pleas for characters like ATWT's Bob, Lisa, and KIm to have their own stories when they were in their 70s. OBVIOUSLY, those characters, especially Lisa, deserved wayyyyy more than what they received as that show neared its end, but Irna Phillips NEVER centered a whole storyline around septuagenarians, and neither did Agnes or Bill."

 

Who says advising/caring for their families and living lives of their own are mutually exclusive for the old folks, though? Matriarchs and patriarchs can do both. The audience pees themselves in glee when the oldtimers find romance, LOL. Douglas Marland spoke of the immense, positive feedback ATWT received when widowed Nancy Hughes found love again and married Dan McCloskey. But waaaaay before that the audience had adored the story of elderly Grandpa Hughes falling in love with his Irma Kopecke shortly before he died. And Harding Lemay wrote in his book how over the moon AW viewers were when matriarch Ada Downs married Gil McGowen and had (an improbable) late-in-life pregnancy. Days' Alice Horton never once stopped giving advice and handing out doughnuts, but even as a great-grandmother she got into the swing of things with Bo and Hope, and shared their adventures. Y&R's Katherine Chancellor continued to be involved in major stories until her 80s.

 

If Nancy Hughes' romance with Dan was not centered around her and Dan, whose "whole story" was it? Katherine Chancellor was past 70 when Y&R revisited the Katherine/Marge drama and launched her romance with Murphy. Wasn't that a whole story devoted to senior citizens?

 

Even the young'uns in the audience are protective of the old folks of Oakdale, Salem, GH, etc., and want to see them on-screen. The reaction the young audience members have when seniors are featured is indicative of this.

 

"I have to reiterate my last point here, though. Agnes never joined the writing staff of a soap that was over 10 years old unless she'd created it herself. I know she started at GL in 1958, but you can hardly consider the pre-Bauer years to be the same show at all. She joined AW when it was a year old. It probably took her one afternoon to become acquainted with every character and storyline that had taken place. Harding Lemay's best work was at AW, which hadn't hit 10 years old when he took over. The list goes on and on. None of them were ever expected to incorporate 30-year-old storylines into their writing. Even Marland's heralded use of history on ATWT went back maybe 15-20 years tops."

 

When Claire Labine took over TGL in 2000, the show was over 60 years old, yet she referenced characters and situations from the show's earliest radio days. When she assumed the reigns of GH it was 30 years old, yet again, Labine knew the history.  Harding Lemay proved knowledgeable of SFT's canon when he took over that 30 year-old program. Writers of today who take over the reigns of enduring franchises are expected to adhere to the roots, and understand the characters and important past events. Just ask Star Wars, Star Trek, and Dr. Who viewers how they would react if newbie writers screwed up the canon. The excuse of, "Well, I wasn't born when Star Trek premiered in the 1960s! How am I supposed to know what a tribble is?" would go over like a lead balloon. Dr. Who saying that he had never had children or grandchildren would bring an avalanche of protests from viewers who had studied the show more carefully than the new scribes who had written such a line. If writers cannot, or will not, learn the facts, they should look for other work, because writing for soaps and other enduring franchises is not an easy  task. Not everyone can do.

 

"What was AW's 10th anniversary episode like? I can only assume it wasn't the big huge clip/return fest that anniversary shows became starting in 1986 (and I LOVE those shows as much as anyone else!). I'm truly feeling j swift's point, though, in that the 1970s were the last decade in which writers could just write and not be held accountable for satisfying all of the sentimental demands of the audience that have only risen with time. The sentimental demands simply were not as high then because, in 1976, the average soap had been on the air for only 13 years."

 

No, in 1976, we had many soaps that had been on television for more than 20-25 years, like: TGL (39 years old), SFT and LoL (25 years old), ATWT and TEON (20 years old), TSS (22 years old).

 

The sentimental demands  were not as vocal and persistent at that time because...THEY WERE BEING MET AND SATISFIED by the creative teams of the day. Criticism of modern soaps is so strong because viewers' expectations for quality storytelling and true characterizations are NOT being met.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Doug needs to get his own sidepiece, but not Dani. Dani is only tolerable with Andre (and her daughter Chelsea), so let's keep her there. How about Shanice? She seems like she really cares about him as a person.
    • Does anyone know the air date on the very first time Stephanie referred to Brooke as "The Slut from the valley"?
    • Does anyone know the air date of the very first John & Stefano scene? As well as the air date on the very last time they had a scene?
    • They interacted before when Dani and Pamela were at the casino. 
    • The last few episodes have been good; the acting, the emotions. It's nice to see that GH can still do classic soap opera. I do wish that they would respect their long term audience more and do it without all the silly rewrites though. And where do they go from here? I'm a bit pessimistic and fully expect the show to go back to the drama-less, boring mess it usually is. I'm giving it a month, tops.
    • RATINGS & PREEMPTIONS UPDATE:   1979-Present: 4 Weeks of data missing:   1 Fast Weekly Week: 8/24/81...This week is missing the prelim ratings and full/partial preemption data.   3 Partial Regular Weeks: 12/14/87, 5/20/91, 5/27/91. These three weeks have ratings data (one from Daytime TV; the other two of the three weeks have ratings & share data from Soap Opera Weekly) These weeks are missing the affiliates/clearances and partial preemptions data. Full preemption data is confirmed by comparing the # of telecasts in the preceding and succeeding books.   TOTAL: 4 Weeks of data missing from 1/1/79-Present (out of 2,422 weeks) 99.9 percent complete!   1973-1978: 35 Weeks of data missing:   10 Full Regular Weeks: 9/3/73, 9/10/73, 9/17/73, 9/24/73, 10/1/73, 10/8/73, 10/15/73, 10/22/73, 4/10/78, 4/17/78. These ten weeks are missing the final ratings/shares/affiliates/clearances and partial preemptions data. Full preemption data is confirmed by comparing the # of telecasts in the preceding and succeeding books. For September 1973, the full preemption data is not confirmable, but newspaper listings & Vanderbilt News telecast listings provide the best list possible in its place.   25 Fast Weekly Weeks: 4/23/73, 6/25/73, 8/27/73, 12/24/73, 4/22/74, 6/24/74, 8/26/74, 12/23/74, 4/21/75, 6/23/75, 8/25/75, 12/22/75, 4/19/76, 6/21/76, 8/23/76, 12/20/76, 4/18/77, 6/20/77, 8/22/77, 12/19/77, 3/20/78, 4/24/78, 6/26/78, 8/28/78, 12/25/78. These 25 weeks are all missing the preliminary ratings and full/partial preemptions data.   TOTAL: 39 Weeks of data missing from 1/1/73-Present (out of 2,735 weeks)  98.6 percent complete!   Note: From the Days of Our Lives and Another World research, the full & partial preemptions should be all available, even from the 39 weeks above.
    • Yes. They were very much out of ideas for Reva by this time. A talk show, blindness...the time travel story... That would have made sense.  (were they acknowledging the Beth/Bill relationship by this point)
    • Will be up tomorrow.   lepää rauhassa Taina Elg

      Please register in order to view this content

          TAINA ELG          3/9/1930 - 5/15/2025 THE DOCTORS         Diana Ross      "Tomorrow Is Ours Today" week of 2/3/64 THE GUIDING LIGHT      Dr. Ingrid Fischer     1980 ONE LIFE TO LIVE     Olympia ___Buchanon "Nicole Bonnard"  1980-81 THE EDGE OF NIGHT      Madame Forrester        1984 ALL MY CHILDREN           Countess Irina Korsova         Unknown Year   LOVING                           Mrs. Mulryan           1993 and HERE'S HOLLYWOOD      Self   1961 MISTER BROADWAY    Self    1964 YOKYOPELIT     Self    1966 CA' C'EST L'AMOUR   On Camera host    2003 movies SUOMISEN PERHE     Lapsi Ollin Kutsuilla    1941 NAIMISIIN  PÄIVÄKSI    Tanssija Kabareessa    1946 THE PRODIGAL      Elissa         1955 DIANE       Alys         1956 GABY     Elsa     1956 LES GIRLS   Angele Dueros    1977 IMITATION GENERAL     Simone    1958 THE 39 STEPS       Fisher    1959 WATUSI    Erica Neuler      1959 THE BACCHANTES     Dirce     1961 SUOMALAISIA MAAILMAN   TURUILLA -- TAINA ELG     Self     1963 JUHLAT LINNASSA    Isabelle Oopperan Pikku Tanssijatar   1966   (Made for T. V.) HERCULES IN NEW YORK     Nemesis     1970 THE GREAT WALLENDAS    Helen Wallenda    1978   (Made for T. V.) LIEBESTRAUM       Old Mother Ralston    1991 DON'T DRINK THE WATER    Anna Gruber      1992   (Made for T. V.) THE MIRROR HAS TWO FACES    Female Professor    1994 TRUE LOVE      Self     2003 STARRING -- TAINA ELG   2003      (Made for T. V.) KUMMELIN JACKPOT     Mrs. Skogstedt    2006 BROADWAY LOOK TO THE LILIES        3/29/1970 - 4/19/1970      Sister Albertine UNCLE VANYA     6/4/1973 - 7/28/1973     Standby --   Yelena Andreyevna  WHERE'S CHARLEY?      12/20/1974 - 2/23/1975   Donna Lucia D'Alvadorez  ****  TONY AWARD NOMINEE -- BEST FEATURED ACTRESS IN A MUSICAL THE UTTER GLORY OF MORRISSEY HALL       5/13/1979     Mrs. Delmonde STRIDER      11/14/1979 - 5/18/1980    Replacement --  Viazapurikha; Methieu; Marie   2/5/1980 - ???? NINE      5/9/1982 - 2/4/1984   Guido's Mother    CABARET    3/19/1998 -1/4/2004     Standby -- Fraulein Schneider TOURING IRMA LA DOUCE     1/4/1962 - 8/25/1962      Irma La Douce I MARRIED AN ANGEL    1964      Angel      GIGI      9/9/1964 - 6/22/1965   Inez Alvarez THERE'S A GIRL IN MY SOUP - NATIONAL TOUR    1969     Shubert Theatre   Cincinnati, OH TWO BY TWO   9/15/1972 -3/11/1973      Esther A LITTLE NIGHT MUSIC  --  NATIONAL PREMIERE  1973 - 74    Desiree Armfeldt    Australian National Tour ZORBA     1976     Madame Hortense 13 RUE DE L'AMOUR        1978    Léontine TITANIC    1/5/1999  - 9/10/2000      Ida Straus; 3rd Class Passenger THEATER PAUL AND CONSTANTINE     1957         La Jolla Playhouse REDHEAD       1960     Essie       Dallas State Fair THE TENDER TRAP   1963     Poppy Matson   Paper Mill Playhouse CAN CAN        1964   Claudine      Kenley Players   Columbus, Ohio SILK STOCKINGS       1964     Notchka           Melodyland, CA WEST SIDE STORY       1966      Maria   Finnish National Opera   Helsinki THE SOUND OF MUSIC     1966 - 71     3 Productions UNCLE VANYA     1974      Standby for Julie Christie   Circle in the Square Uptown SOMETHING'S AFOOT     1986     Miss Tweed    Liberty Hall   Lowell, MA CABARET     1996      FrauleinSchneider    Walnut Street Theatre Main Stage Philadelphia REQUIEM FOR WILLIAM     2003    Connelly Theater, NYC          MEMORY OF SUMMER    Alice O PIONEERS! I HATE HAMLET Family Ties Parents --     Helena Doroumova (an immigrant pianist) and Ake Elg  (Ake Ludwig) also a pianist Marriages      Carl Bjorkenheim   1953 - 58    Divorced   1 Child -- Raoul Bjorkenheim      Rocco Caporale    1982 - 6/30/2008      His Death         LAURA PILLMAN   THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL      Cassandra    4/24/2025   NURSES' BALL DANCER                            RODRIGO VARANDAS      GENERAL HOSPITAL     Nurse Jack       5/21 - 23/2025 movies VIVENDO COM ZIKA        2016 LET'S DUB: VOXX STUDIOS COMMERCIAL     Audience    2016 BIO FILTER   Mr. Ramirez    2020 PSYCHE     Entity      2025 RED SOULS FEELING GOOD A MINUTE TO LOVE Upcoming SEESAW     Max      TBA    In Production THEATER ORIGINAL -- THE MUSICAL: THE LIFE STORY OF JANIVA MAGNESS    Candlelight Pavilion LEGALLY BLONDE     Candlelight Pavilion THOROUGHLY MODERN MILLIE          Candlelight Pavilion SINGIN IN THE RAIN     2015      Ensemble    WEST SIDE STORY       2015     Pepe     Candlelight Pavilion  EMPIRE   (World Premiere)   Jesse; Ensemble CHILDREN OF EDEN    2016   Storyteller; Snake    Cabrillo Music Theatre WOMEN ON THE VERGE OF A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN       2017        Carlos IRVING BERLIN'S WHITE CHRISTMAS   2017      Ensemble    Long Beach IN THE HEIGHTS        2017      Swing; Ensemble    Musical Theatre West CABARET    Herman -- Kit Kat Boy     2018      KINKY BOOTS     2020    Announcer; Angel       Cerritos, CA MAMMA MIA       2021   Pepper; Ensemble    Understudy -- Bill     SHREK    Dragon Puppeteer; Big Bad Wolf   YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN   2022     Ensemble           1776           Leather Apron;  Painter A FEW GOOD MEN    William T. Santiago  ROMEO AND JULIET     Romeo TOURING PETER PAN      Cecco SINGIN' IN THE RAIN     2014 https://stagescenela.com/2016/03/juan-caballer-rodrigo-varandas/       WANTED TO LOCK TRACY UP                                      JEFFERY THOMAS JOHNSON       Also Credited as Jeff Johnson   PARTY OF FIVE 2.0    Officer __ Bryce   2020 GENERAL HOSPITAL    Sheriff __ Lewis   April 2025 and NEWTON'S CRADLE     Officer Goodloe   2020 MY SECRET AGENT HUSBAND    Maverick Thompson     2024 HER POSSESSIVE GUARD       Gage      2024 movies THE TWO JAKES      Golfer    1990 QUEENS LOGIC      Club Patron     1991 DRACULA      Van Helsing's Student     1992 TEXAS PAYBACK     Board Member    1995 CALL GIRL    Man in Black   1995 CITIZEN RUTH   Harlan's Biker Friend     1996 LOVE ME TWICE     Phillip   1996 AMERICAN TIGERS     Krause    1996 THE BRAVE       Clerk    1997 CONTACT     Mechanical     1997 THE POSTMAN      Rope Bridge Soldier   1997 GETTING THERE     Waiter in Ski Lodge    2002 OPERATION TERROR     Federal Agent Thomas   2012 LIFE TRACKER   Brigadier General Anthony Morris    2013 CARDINAL MATTER      Jeremy Ryan    2016 THE DEVIL HAS A NAME      Police Captain     2019 AQUARIUM OF THE DEAD     Smith    2021 SUPER VOLCANO    Guillerman     2022   (Made for T. V.) 20.0  MEGAQUAKE     Guillerman   2022   (Made for T. V.) ICE STORM      Guillerman    2023    (Made for T. V.) BIRD OF PARADISE     Dominic Dunaway     2023 THE LAUNDRESS    Guy Sullivan    2024 DEAD WRONG     Mason    2024 24 HOURS TO D-DAY      Major Jones     2024 THE SIX TRIPLE EIGHT    Colonel Davenport    2024 Upcoming FIRE ANT     Nolan Karr   TBA   Post Production  INCIDENT AT COTTER CREEK     Mason     TBA    In Production JOY RIDGE    David Whipliton     TBA   In Production ALL PAID FOR     Jack    TBA     Pre Production                            ASHLEY CAPLE   GENERAL HOSPITAL   Hot Girl at Pool    6/14/2023                            Charlie's Pub Waitress     1/28/2025 and TREASURE KING      Daisy Duke    2014 HEROES WITH ISSUES    Cortara     2016; 2018 movies DESTRUCTION: LAS VEGAS   Spring Break Female    2013 ENTOURAGE      Sloan's Friend     2015 THE GUEST HOUSE   Kristy   2016 DOES SIZE MATTER     Girl in the Park  # 1     2016 HOOKED ON A HEIFER    Hot Babe # 1  Brutus' Girlfriend   2017 TALES OF FRANKENSTEIN    Adelina   2018 ASS CLOWNS: CONSTIPATED   Pool Girl   2021 OFF THE RECORD      KLM Casting Girl    2024 Upcoming NOIR      Mistress    TBA    Post Production     RED CARPET DUDE                                   GEORGE PENNACCHIO   GENERAL HOSPITAL    George Pennacchio, Red Carpet  Nurses' Ball 206; 2018; 2019; 2023; May 2025 movies SPLENDOR     Newscaster     1994 FOUR FINGERS OF THE DRAGON    Self      2003 THE LEGACY     Self    2010 SILENT LIFE: THE STORY OF THE LADY IN BLACK   T. V. Reporter   2023 Appeared in the sitcom Less than Perfect in 2003. Serves on the Board of the charity group, The Thalias. Has been the Entertainment Reporter since 1996 at ABC-7 in Los Angeles. He also hosts Oscar Specials.  
    • I can see why the Sam/Amanda story went downhill so fast. Thomas Gibson was a terrible replacement. I don't remember the circumstances of RKK quitting  (if his contract was over or if the departure was more acrimonious), but Gibson just sucks the energy out of every scene. He has no chemistry with anyone.
    • They have renewed my interest back into Hayley. I hope they keep writing her like today. She was fun and looked fabulous. Facts on top of facts! And that is the area that I want them to deep dive into more.  I forget what her purpose was for even visiting him at this point. Leslie had a great May but she can not do more of the same in June and July. I became very excited to see them interact. I don't know where it is going, but it could be a joy to watch. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy