Jump to content

Fuller House


dragonflies

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 498
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

That was a nicely done teaser. I don't think I've ever seen more than one episode of the show and it even got me to feel nostalgic about it.

 

 

What, you mean you didn't expect them to rebuild the set or in general still be at that house? And what's wrong with the title? I'm honestly not getting the objection. Not that it's some brilliant title but what about it is that bad?

 

 

:lol:

Edited by YRBB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guess, I just never really thought about it

 

The name is stupid. Who says fuller to mean more full? Fuller makes no sense in context with the title. A fuller is a person that fulls clothes. Fuller does not mean more full as there is no word for that definition. It looks and sounds stupid. Even as a play on words, doesnt this show have less cast members than the original? By that the house would be less full not "fuller".

 

 Is DJs last name Fuller bc thats the only way it would somewhat make sense. Even then, I dont like it bc the immediate jump is the play on the original as a sequel series, which had a different meaning

Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Girl, you are overthinking this waaaaaay too much. No, really. A person that fulls clothes? Come on. :lol: It is almost certainly a play on words, and something that I expected them to do from the beginning. Besides, how does it not make sense? They had a full house, now they are implying there's even more. Instead of 'The Next Generation' or something like that, they went for the pun. Stupid, yes, but, again, I fail to see why people are so upset about it. Shouldn't they be more upset about how crappy the show was?

Edited by YRBB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

LOL I get it. But what I'm saying is that it does make sense in a pun. tongue-in-cheek, kind of way. We're probably wasting too much time on this :P Honestly, yeah, I don't know why they didn't just use that. It's like THE X-FILES coming back with THE Xiest-FILES lol 

Edited by YRBB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you for the tag! It's always a pleasure to see these little pearls of memories. 
    • Uh-oh. Today just might’ve been the first Paula/Jeanne stinker. I have a feeling whose fault that might be though. So, Doug III is getting a job at the Pub?  It’s good to see him interact with other characters. I enjoyed his scenes with Roman, even though the talk of Frankie and Max seemed a little random. And it also could be really interesting now that Tate knows. Days really need to start pushing their rivalry again. We need some follow up from the punch. Tying it all to Holly, to Sophia’s pregnancy, to the guys that Doug III owes money to could be good.  But yeah, wayyy too much Leo again in today’s episode. Seriously, has anything changed with this nothing character? I thought it was all Ron’s fault, but maybe Greg Rikaart is (partially) responsible for Leo being so insufferable.  And yeah seriously, Rafe needs to throw all of these people out of his house. Including Gabi

      Please register in order to view this content

      But I do wonder who’s the mysterious voice that Gabi overheard with EJ on the night he was shot. Based on yesterday’s episode, I have a suspicion. 
    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy