Jump to content

GH50: January 2014 Discussion - HAPPY NEW YEAR!


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I didn't think it was creepy. I did think it took up too much time in an already OTT episode full of stupid stories, and that the kids could barely deliver their lines. Spencer was funny and cute, but he's not an actor and he shouldn't have had that much. Emma is cute in doses but annoying when they try to make her too active. I hate it when she turns into a fawning, mugging joke machine.

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

All I could think is about how GL handled Rachel Miner, Bryan Buffinton, and Gregory Burke when they were child actors, and how hard the show worked to keep everything believable.

Now it's all just CAMP CAMP ONE LINERS CAMP CAMP CAMP.

No.

  • Members
Posted

the stuff yesterday was too grown IMO. Spencer getting in an expensive bath robe for Emma and all that fighting between the two boys was a bit much.

I remember people feeling the same way on AMC about Emma, AJ and Miranda. Thank god the show never tried to write a love triangle around those 7 year olds

  • Members
Posted

That sh!t with the children was REEEEEEDICULOUS! I don't expect these kids to be great actors, which is why they should not have so much dialogue.

Between that and the Dr. O trash, why is this show not on the cartoon network?!

ROTGUT!

  • Members
Posted

That would definitely be better than what she doing now. I don't like FF when I watch any program...but I don't know how much more I can take of this Heather mess.

  • Members
Posted

It was way too grown. Spencer was acting like a little mini Sonny trying to romance Emma bragging about this and that. Yesterday actually made me think of when Emily told Sonny that what comes off charming in an adult comes off bratty and obnoxious in a kid.

  • Members
Posted

Every now and then a show finds a child actor who really has the chops to be frontburner. GL was blessed with those kids. I'd say the Aldersons were that way on OLTL. But even then the shows usually have the sense to have the child play off adults not try to make a full blown kiddie scene with their own stories. Usually the point of a teen scene has been to try and attract teen viewers over the summer. I don't understand what RC is trying to accomplish here. Is he going for the much coveted single-digit viewer? Does he think there's some underserved audience craving to see a love triangle between children?

  • Members
Posted

The children should be supporting the adults' storylines not having one of their own. They should be mainly interacting with the adults.

I wonder if this episode was taped the day TR decided to go to Y&R. We hadn't seen him or Mac in a minute and their first couple scenes are them "supporting" Emma in her little storyline. That would have made me leave too LOL

  • Members
Posted

I saw someone compare it to the short films Shirley Temple used to do where the kids played out storylines from films, parodying grown up actors. The whole thing just seems seedy and forced.

  • Members
Posted

Lol at Lucas hopping on a plane as soon as he finds out she's missing. Yet he was nowhere to be found when she got married, when Michael was shot, went to prison, got raped. Or when Josslyn was born or sick.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I could've sworn FV let other people direct either here or at OLTL. I may be wrong. IIRC Kimberly is now very active directing multi-cam/sitcom work.
    • IIRC MVJ said the million was just the first piece of what Leslie got or was already owed, something they did make explicit in dialogue but not too explicit. Still, I am past worrying about it. I do think they want 30-yo elder millennial Peaches in her Sophia Petrillo wig to be a point of pathos for Leslie. In theory I am fine with that, and don't dislike Peaches despite the jarring physical disconnect and need for a recast lol. But I do think they do a lot of B&B-style whizzing from Point A to Point C with Leslie on this kind of stuff - in one scene she is raising hell, in the next she is weeping over Peaches. There's very little transition to that sometimes that allows for the nuance, and that can be done much better and they can go much deeper with Leslie (and most characters). The newer/younger audience for the show may have less issue with this kind of quick change than we do.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       Thank you.   That was part of my reasoning as well. I think about the days of Kevin, Joey, and Jessica on OLTL or Lucky/Liz/Nik/Sarah/Emily on GH or the Last Blast Kids on DAYS or the Glow by Jabot kids, and it takes me back. Sure I started soaps due to the older cast with their divas, but I do like to see people around my age back then, too. Great memories.   So I love a good relatable teen tale. Bullying. Hormones for the Bad Boy. College choices and internal conflict. 
    • Thank you for the information.  I did listen to the entire interview with Miss Roux -- way back when it was first released.  But I am unable to recall her mentioning Connie Ford, and don't have time nor effort to listen to the entire thing again, just for one small morsel. So again, thanks for responding.    I do recall Roux sounded extremely fragile and perhaps a bit wounded in the interview. I almost felt guilty for even listening to it.  So perhaps that has some influence on my reluctance to listen to it again.  She seemed troubled, to say the least.   
    • Boxer-briefs, huh?   Well...called it on Cane/Giggly Heffa hooking up so not surprised.
    • Do you have Addie’s first air date??
    • Even now Victor is always so warm with Ashley. I liked their brief re-pairing as well.
    • @depboy Thanks. That does help. @titan1978 @Paul Raven Really enjoying the analysis of the production methods and what Monty was doing.  I wish we got some of those biopics here that a few UK soaps got as a biopic on Monty's first few years at GH would be fascinating. 
    • The original 'mansion' was one of the set upgrades they did in 1980 . It was the Chandler residence. When that story fizzled out I think it became Stuart Whyland's house -not 100 on that. But it was revealed that Stuart was working for the Di Mera's (rewrite) so Stefano moved into that house. Mmmm...then it became Alex Marshall's? Neil and Liz lived there also. At some point it was finally replaced.  
    •   Thanks. I'm glad she got to as I know some producers tend to get mad if actors want to direct.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy