Jump to content

Duck Dynasty brouhaha


alphanguy74

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yep... very true, and like I've said many times, if you want complete freedom in what you say on social media, etc.. work for your damn self. I say and do what I want, and I always say "What are you gonna do? Call my boss and have me fired?" LOL I saw one of the guys who worked for me in the past posted big support for the Phil character. He since moved away, but I defriended him, and if he moved back, I wouldn't use him again. And that's my decision, nobody else's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I just want to make it clear that banning Phil Roberson is not my main objection. (He certainly does not deserve a television show, but I'd like to see Duck Dynasty continue for a few months so that it would damage A&E.) If A&E banned him immediately and then issued an apology for ever airing his program in the first place, that would suffice. But it's the insincerity whereby A&E acknowledges no wrongdoing and makes a half-assed apology tantamount to "Robertson's statements don't reflect our corporate values" that really irritates me. Obviously, this is on a much lesser scale of severity, but I hate it when--after cancelling a soap (which a network has every right to do)--a network then makes a bogus statement on how much they cherish that show and its viewers. Just tell the truth, and admit that the soap was cancelled for business reasons.

The whole hypocrisy over free speech--on both the part of many conservatives and many liberals--really bothers me. Liberals find hate speech so loathsome, and many seem less receptive to the argument that the First Amendment protects hate speech. Yet regarding the things that conservatives hate equally as much--things like flag burning and extremist Muslims expressing their own views--I hear so few conservatives say that such actions are protected by the First Amendment. (I am overgeneralizing about liberals and conservatives in order to make my point, but I think that it simply cannot be denied that free speech hypocrisy exists on both sides. Of course, there are many conservatives who abhor hate speech, as well as many liberals who detest flag burning and the sentiments expressed by extreme Muslims.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just found out that A&E is playing a 35-hour Duck Dynasty marathon, which is so hypocritical. Regardless of how I feel, A&E has the right to do what it wants, but the network is just playing to both sides by banning Robertson and then running a marathon of his show. Cracker Barrel seems to be similar, first announcing that they would stop carrying Duck Dynasty products and then reversing said decision.

Companies can either stand with the Robertsons or stand against them, but they can't do both, or it just looks like all they stand for is making money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just making a point that this is what a A&E should do (if it had a conscience). Of course I'm totally aware that the real world doesn't work this way.

Marceline, I don't know how you specifically are feeling about this, but I would imagine that A&E's decision to run a 35-hour Duck Dynasty marathon is irritating a lot of people (who support the immediate ban of Robertson). As a result of this latest action, I am uncertain if A&E is fully pleasing anyone. (But the flip side is that the network is also taking steps not to fully upset anyone, thereby minimizing fallout from a bad situation.)

My best guess as to Cracker Barrel's "thought process" was that they initially banned the Duck Dynasty products over the outrage caused by Robertson's comments, but reversed course because there was an unexpectedly large "I Stand With Phil" movement (that's more prevalent in the areas in which the restaurant does business).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They only banned the products that had Phil on them.

Keep in mind that Cracker Barrel has faced accusations and I think lawsuits over racism and homophobia. So this was lip service to that.

What I want to know is how many of those people standing with put-upon millionaire Phil are going to boycott buying those products and boycott watching the show. If they don't, then they're hypocrites, because most of that money is going to A&E.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meanwhile Sarah Palin's daughter seems to happily slam the gay community as a whole, not even pretending to say that only some people even noticed or cared about his comments. I wonder if she's still bitter because her homophobic behavior on her TV show got her bad press and bad ratings.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/bristol-palin-slams-hypocritical-gay-community-duck-dynasty-flap-article-1.1556893

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish I was surprised.

I read the comments at the Hollywood Reporter article on this and they were incredibly, incredibly ugly, homophobic trash. It made me feel sick. This is the audience for Duck Dynasty. Bigots and hatemongers and proud of it.

I think A&E just did this so they could say they tried. They likely always planned to back down. Meanwhile, they've made money hand-over-fist from all the people who rushed to buy their products to support Phil Robertson.

A&E is cynical and hollow, and all those dumbass [!@#$%^&*] for brains out there actually think they taught A&E a lesson. Yeah, you taught them a lesson in how to make sure their executives can buy another summer home.

A&E, the "liberal" media (which almost exclusively covered the anti-gay comments only, not the racist comments), and this family have set up a very dangerous environment for gay people and black people, and emboldened bigots, racists, and homophobes. We will hear all about the backlash for "family values" and see this used against blacks and gay people in the media, in politics, everywhere. This will have a chilling effect.

I will never watch anything on A&E again. Ever. I'm sure they don't care. I'm just one viewer. That's fine. They can kiss my ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Make that two viewers. Supposedly the rest of the family vowed to bolt if they didnt reinstate the dumb racist moron back in the show..and A&E caved....I guess they care more about money than anything else....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carl, I'm sorry this made you so upset. I hope you guys plan to communicate this to A & E. Your lack of viewership won't make a difference, but they need to know how you feel. Don't let them get away with this!

I will support your cause. I will not watch anything on A & E again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think they care, but I know what you're saying and I might drop them a line someday. Thank you for your support and for reading all that crap I wrote.

It's not so much this bigot family that upsets me, it's more the power they have, what they represent, and how this is going to hurt so many people in the industry and out of the industry who are already at the bottom of the ladder.

I am embarrassed for people who respond to remarks about how black people were only happy while hoeing cotton and decide this means the person who is saying them is a hero and needs to have endless boycotts in his name. I am frightened by this mentality, and how widespread it is. I feel like people are looking for someone to help justify their own bigotry.

I also hate how much time is spent on how the media has been taught a lesson, or A&E has been taught a lesson. That's BS. They've been taught the lesson of big bills stuffed in their g-strings. The only people who will suffer from this are people who are already suffering, and the media does not care about them, not now, not ever.

The thought of what will come after this and how this will empower hate groups is what bothers me the most.

I was reading some of this man's sick comments about women. This is an American hero, apparently.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-five-jawdropping-moments-from-his-sermons-20131220,0,4783746.story#axzz2ohLtubT7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm really shocked at this turn of events. On the one hand, I had no idea what or who Duck Dynasty was before this, so I doubt this guy is influencing anyone other than his own, if you know what I mean. On the other hand, it's disturbing that A&E is giving this guy a platform. Overall, I mostly think that this type of ignorance has always existed and it always will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh but those "Pharleys" were very adamant that they stay together and be featured everyday (though I did like their websites and the recaps they gave each day.) I agree, they were interesting at first, but the longer it went on the more Harley became this sad sack jealous wife, the more Phillip became a dumb Josh type character torn between two women and the more Beth became a pathetic looser chasing her ex.   I think after Beth came back it would have been an interesting triangle of three "good" people trying to find a way, and I did like the "Who killed Carl" and how Harley and Beth had to work together there, but we all know Phillip would have dumped Harley to get together with Beth, Harley would have been hurt but dusted herself off and moved on, and eventually Beth and Phillip would implode. They didn't bring back one Reardon or Bauer for Mo's funeral...did anyone think they would waste money and energy on poor sad Nadine?
    • I hate to be that person, but Monday’s episode was a mess. The editing was an eyesore—felt like multiple scenes got chopped mid-way through. Anita’s singing was completely over the top. And while TT can sing, something about her performance just felt off—her voice was actually kind of grating   Leslie’s motivations make zero sense, unless we’re supposed to believe she just thrives on chaos. Her smirking while her daughter got locked out? That was straight-up cartoon villain territory. Once again, the Duprees came off like a full-on mob—especially the girls, who acted more like petty mean girls than anything else. And don’t get me started on Kat and Eva. Their dialogue was repetitive and totally unrealistic. “We have opposite fairy tales”? Seriously? Give me a break.(not that literally though, I want my episodes daily!!)
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks. I'd forgotten about that. It is odd she wasn't asked back. Maybe they just gave up.  Harley/Philip is one of those relationships which lingered on longer than it should have. I never got the sense the show had any great interest in them together beyond the first six months or so, and there was little to no chemistry between them after that point.
    • If Leslie wanted to be super shady

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I am just so happy with the new writing. Everything feels so much more mature. The connections between plots and characters reminds me of the eighties, and I just plain old LIKE everybody. I very much enjoyed Philip's apology tour with his two exes, and both of them being gracious to him. This version of Philip is so interesting, very flawed, but trying to do better, and I do believe he wanted the brother bond with Xander very much and is hoping to get that back. Speaking of brothers, we got Xander's first ever mention of his other brother, Bo. And how interesting that Titan is also working on a cure for sepsis. If the one with Dr Russell falls through we have a back up plan. And the seamless writing continued with Sarah trying to get out of a conference and Kayla needing to get Dr Russell out of town, I love when things just make sense like that. Shout out to Xander with cucumbers on his eyes lol And under the new regime I am not hating Stalex. I think this couple was just hammered by Ron by constantly making them sleep with other people. It was hard to root for them when the writer didn't care about them as a pairing, just about getting Rob naked. I am happy to see what happens here too. Stefan got a get well card to EJ? I wonder if it had a coded HELP ME in the message. Glad Kayla turned him down. She should never forget how he used Steve as a pawn back in the day. Characters are actually remembering this stuff these days.
    • That happens sometimes on cbs/paramount. Just refresh the page and it should work.
    • In a 1997 SOD article, Ehlers mentions that she was asked to return several times, but was surprised she wasn't asked to return for her "mother's" funeral.  This was when she returned for the 60th Anniversary event. They were a really popular pairing for a few years ago.  As an older viewer, it seemed strange seeing Beth as the odd one out, but 1998 Beth was a totally different character.  She was written as a manipulative, vixen.
    • Unhappy camper! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It seems obvious based on the initial material that Korte was going to take another foolish run at Jason and Carly a la 2021 and hoped Mulcahey being back would make it work, as he wrote such famous material for Steve, Sarah, etc. I think a couple good dialogue scenes came out of them together very early on, but there was never any denying that Steve and Laura have never had and will never have any romantic chemistry, plus the audience doesn't want it. So they pivoted to her with that useless dayplayer (Brennan) and now here they all are, spinning their wheels doing nothing of value on the show. I do think PM had planned to do much more with Jason's sons and that rivalry/friction, but once he was gone so was Jake. I've rarely seen any of the core mob 3 feel so totally extraneous and directionless on the canvas. Not that I mind. Anything that makes Jason easier to get rid of works for me.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy