Jump to content

Llanview In The Afternoon: An Oral History of One Life to Live, by Jeff Giles out today


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

But it wasn’t just the editing that changed once Gottlieb took control. In fact, she overhauled a number of things, some of which worked brilliantly (the hiring of new head writers Michael Malone and Josh Griffith) and some of which weren’t as well-received (new opening credits and a short-lived attempt to rely on more self-contained stories with shorter arcs).

Howie Zeidman: Linda changed everything about the opening credits -- the logo, that champagne glass, everything. I remember they screened it for everyone in the studio, and there was complete silence after it ended. Not good. Very awkward.

Peter Miner: Those short-arc stories completely lost all the fans, because the characters they wanted to see weren’t there.

Giles, Jeff (2013-09-09). Llanview in the Afternoon: An Oral History of One Life to Live (Kindle Locations 3215-3223). . Kindle Edition.

Yeah that opening from 1992-94 seemed very porn like to me. The couple making out then the champenge over-flowing which symbolized to me sperm flowing than the new born baby. I was like What the !@#$%^&*]!!!

  • Replies 333
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

So Ellen Holly only tells the truth about things we want to agree with? Like Paul Rauch being an dick? And I doubt she was meant to be quoting Erika or Agnes verbatim. You all realize that this stuff happened less than 20 years after the Civil Rights movement and that minority representation has actually decreased on daytime over the last 30 years?

I love Erika Slezak and Agnes Nixon but they are still white women of a certain age raised in a particular time, it's not impossible that they said or inferred these things. Seriously, grow up, read a book, stop dismissing things you dislike as crazy.

Anyway, I want to read this but I'd like the printed edition. Might just end up printing it off at work.

  • Members
Posted

I've read it, and I don't believe it for a second. I think at this point Holly might believe it happened, but I do not. Erika responds to that story and denies it, much like she's denied other claims - and actually, the only other incident was Holly misinterpreting a quote she had in a soap magazine during the Rauch era, where Erika was critiquing the all-white state of the show - and talked at length about Ellen Holly in the past, flat-out; she remains complimentary about her to this day, despite these stories. And Erika isn't exactly keeping her earrings and makeup in her interviews for this book. She's never evaded the issue, unlike Agnes. And here Nixon actually addresses the issue of Holly upfront. Agnes Nixon may be a sly operator, but she could've completely glossed over the issue here as she has in the past and done the sweet old lady act, and she doesn't. She says Holly hates her now.

There's a lot of time in the book devoted to Ellen Holly, and more specifically to the clash over casting Jack Scott with Arthur Burghardt, which she desperately did not want and who everyone in the cast hated. And she absolutely deserves to be heard. But around the time she started making sub-Geocities websites ranting about how Agnes Nixon personally used and abused her like a slave and destroyed her in show business - and Agnes had long since walked off of OLTL by the time Holly first quit the show - it just became really, really sad IMO. And there's a fair bit of that in the book, with Holly claiming Agnes personally destroyed her. That's not what happened, AFAIC.

A lot of other things deeply, cancerously ingrained in the DNA of the daytime industry happened to Ellen Holly, as well as to other performers of color, and it's a stain the show has never righted. But at this point, after hearing her out many a time I have to sadly say that I think her recollection and POV is deeply affected by a lot of curdled resentment and unresolved conflicts. I wish it could be settled peaceably with the people involved, but I don't think she has any interest in that. I don't think anything would be enough to make her okay with it, and that's probably more than fair but I also don't think it's the fault of Erika Slezak or Agnes Nixon. If anything, in recent years she's doubled or tripled down. She's even taking a couple sideways shots at Al Freeman Jr. in the book, despite her obvious love and respect for him. I just don't know what to say about it at this point.

I should say I believe I also remember Holly referencing the Tavern on the Green party story in her book, and absolutely no mention of Slezak saying that is in there. I have no doubt that ABC or the show shuffled her and Lillian Hayman off stage left for that photo, but the people she casts in that scenario is a late in the day addition.

  • Members
Posted

Just because a person is white and grew up during the 60's doesn't mean that person is racist. It isn't as if there was a sudden generation born with a "Minority-Liberating Gene" built into there DNA then suddenly we have protests. People who opposed racism were on earth just as long as people who promoted it, it just wasn't until the 50s/60s when people began to be open about it. Television also helped as well because news coverage hit the masses at once.

People like Agnes Nixon are the reasons why the world is different today. If she was Racist why would she create black characters as Doctors and Lawyers?

People are mainly questioning Ellen Holly because it seems like just yesterday she loved Agnes then now she hates her. She was even being interviewed as part of the Lifetime Intimate Portrait interview and said wonderful things.

Just jump to 2:10

Please register in order to view this content

  • Members
Posted

Yeah, we know about these things long before you decide you have to post them. That interview was over a decade ago.

  • Members
Posted

You wish I had said this...but I didn't so what the hell are you talking about?

As for the rest I'm not even going to respond to because I'm genuinely sorry that you're not very bright.

Re: Vee's post. You're probably right about all of that, I was just irritated by how dismissive her complaints usually get treated.

  • Members
Posted

You basically stated that white people who grew up during the 60s are all racist. I am also sorry that you are not very bright either because you know it is the truth and I know you are just trying to raise hell over an issue that you have no backing for.

  • Members
Posted

I agree. I think that's no way to talk about her when we weren't there and don't know the full dimensions of the situation over the years, but we do know what became of Ellen Holly and a lot of men and women of color like her in this industry.

I may not agree with a lot of what she's saying of late, particularly the aspersions about Slezak or Nixon - who I think is, at core, a relentlessly practical businesswoman who made hard choices for her business, and might have been able to do more for Holly or might not have - but I think Holly's story, and all the angles on it, must always be present.

He absolutely did not say that. You have been on this board ten minutes and think you've got it on lock because you have YouTube.

  • Members
Posted

RE: Frons

Ilene Kristen: It was very hard the last 10 years with that guy around. He had very little respect for the medium, or the producers, or the writing team. Just because you want to see a 24-year-old girl in her underwear all the time doesn't mean that's what the audience wants to see. Getting older in this business isn't easy. That's why I stay in shape and make sure I can fit into a size two pair of jeans.

Giles, Jeff (2013-09-09). Llanview in the Afternoon: An Oral History of One Life to Live (Kindle Locations 4918-4923). . Kindle Edition.

I wonder if this was during The Stacy Morsaco Mess

  • Members
Posted

I hope this woman is never allowed to produce TV ever again

Jozie Emmerich: Poor Brian Frons -- he’s not the ultimate killer of the daytime drama, as much as people would like to say so. I do think it’s horrifying that those two shows were canceled on his watch, because they were owned and operated series -- they were profit centers. But ultimately, other things got in the way, and I can understand how. If a show is 40 or 50 years old , it gets very expensive to keep the same people. It gets more expensive on every level. And obviously , the profit margin has changed. Certainly, the ratings have gone down. How do you charge an advertising agency for a spot? And quite frankly, I don’t think the shows are as good as they used to be.

Giles, Jeff (2013-09-09). Llanview in the Afternoon: An Oral History of One Life to Live (Kindle Locations 5013-5018). . Kindle Edition.

  • Members
Posted

I am onky half way through but one of the most interesting people in the book is Paul Rauch. To read what they all say about his insensitive, brutish ways and how if you were casting an evil producer you would cast him really tells only half the story because almost to the last comment they almost all say he was incredibly talented, knew his job well, had a vision and they would all work with him again. One person even said the moment they fired Rauch was the moment OLTL started its decline.

He must have been a very interesting individual.

As for Ellen Holly's statement about Slezak and black bitches (or whatever the exact word was), this I would be a little skeptical about. First of course Slezak denies it, so that is a wash in the she said/she said dept. But then, how did Ellen Holly know Slezak made the comment to Nixon? Did Nixon run to tell her? Or are we to assume that Slezak is so lacking in political skills that she just blurted that out at Tavern on The Green in front of Holly--and Holly alone? No one else seems to have heard the comment, or at least if anyone did hear it they didn't come forward. It's a bit of a stretch because even in 1982 people did not go around Manhattan saying "Hey you black bitch, get out of my face" while at Tavern On The Green. I was in 1982, and it wasn't Alabama circa 1955.

  • Members
Posted

Paperback version is now available on Amazon !!! Just purchased it for $11.74

Got next day delivery so I can take it on my beach vacation down south - can't wait to read !!!

  • Members
Posted

I know it's an obvious question coming from me, but I have to ask:

Were James DePaiva or Fiona Hutchison interviewed?

I'd love to see the discussion about the year 1991 in particular, given how dramatic the change from Rauch to Gottlieb really was.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Congratulations, Laura! You're still a lousy Mayor though 

      Please register in order to view this content

      GH really needs to keep the WSB honeypot away from Emma, and especially from Gio. If they want to put the two of them in a triangle with someone, it should definitely be with Trina. And, while I don't like Sidwell or this storyline that much, that was a really good ending. I didn't see it coming either.
    • In regards to Long's 2nd stint, it appears as though she officially came back as head-writer between the 4th of July/Bauer Barbeque episodes 1987 and mid August 1987.. and then between April and September 1988 were episodes written by the scabs.  I almost count her having 3 stints head-writing Guiding Light since the writer strike lasted five months. In her 2nd stint, she seemed focused on the following: - Sonni returning from the dead thus keeping Reva/Josh apart yet again so she naturally turns to Alan and causes the ending of the Vanessa/Alan relationship.   I wonder if Maeve's decision to leave affected some of this because she was gone by January 1988, a few months after Long's return so she had to come up with a way to get Vanessa to take off (and it was to be there for Billy during a low point if I recall). - Phillip/Chelsea were pretty heavily focused on during this 2nd stint period and I liked their rapport. - A lesser focused story in the background was the Lillian/Hawk/Sarah situation - Formulating her next version of the 4 Muskateers with Cam/Dinah/Harley/Alan Michael... but in order to include a more rough around the edges Harley.. Dinah was softened quite a bit (though I did see a cat fight between Harley/Dinah where Dinah belted Harley so I think Turco could have played an edgier Dinah). - There also seemed to be a Spaulding takeover going on with Phillip trying to oust Alan.. and it affected his relationship with Chelsea. Post-writer strike, I noticed that the Phillip/Harley arc kicked into gear with him pretending to be 'my fair lady' with Harley.. but trying to set it up to look as though they were sleeping together.  That arc plus the aftermath of Maeve's death were what Long started when she came back after the strike. I don't know how the Alan/Reva situation would have gone had CB remained in the role and if the writer strike hadn't happened.
    • I've only been solidly watching the show for the first time the past few months. I was familiar with parts of the show and some of the character just from being a soap fan. I do have to say that I am enjoying GH more than any other shows right now. Sure, it has flaws but it seems to move along fairly well, and most of all, the eye-candy. Damn, there are so many cute men on this show. Nathan and Michael are at the top of my list.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I have to say that I was honestly surprised by the exit this week. With spoilers and casting news, it is tough to pull off an honest shocker, and this shooting actually made gasp out loud.  I would bet many of you would enjoy it, if you watch it more regularly, I know that has been my experience this month.  
    • I believe she is talented and maligned for a reason. I fundamentally disagree with what she thinks soaps should be. And I am far from a traditionalist when it comes to the genre. There are many direct sources of her behavior and bad decisions, and my own eyes watching ratings decline after sweeps bumps on her her shows, it’s pretty clear she survived in power, especially at GH, specifically because the genre was declining. I will not further derail this thread with JFP unless it is pertinent. But I finish with this. She was asked directly over the years if she regretted killing Maureen off from Guiding Light. And for years she said she did. But someone pinned her down when she was at Y&R the first time, Michael Logan perhaps, and she admitted what she regretted and would never do again is making the audience care so much about a character right before killing then off. The tragic nature of the story leading into killing Maureen is what she regrets, not that she misjudged the audience, or that she didn’t have the foresight to see how destabilizing that was going to be for that particular show.    
    • If they bring back Connie, that kooky lady who kidnapped Melinda, or if Stephanie's stalker is a crazed fan, or if it is something based on her book, I may pluck an eyelash. I think the misdirect is that the stalker is after Alex, when they are really after Stephanie (unless it is Joy Wesley - that would be a surprise).
    • I feel very bad for BF that Giggly Heffa is being forced onto him.  At least BF looked yummy in a scene that otherwise was very icky to watch. I still can’t believe Flynn took this role. He also seems a tad bored/underwhelmed sometimes I almost see the regret in his face. 
    • Darn MM!

      Please register in order to view this content

        I'm not sure if this belongs here or in the hotness thread.  
    • Liking Mansi is not the issue. The character has flopped and it is clear FV has downgraded her after making a hard, hard push for Kristina in her most unwatchable state. Or what @DRW50 said.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy