Jump to content

Prospect Park Sues ABC Over ‘One Life To Live’ & ‘All My Children’ Licensing Agreement


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 725
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Remember when she used to wax poetic about K-Mart? That was about 12,000 big purple outfits ago.

  • Members
Posted
Yes! Because it isn't about the characters. Pp has the characters. They want the actors and files this lawsuit because they didn't get them. Period. Exactly!
  • Members
Posted

The thing is--regardless, technically it sounds like PP are in the right here, as petty as it may be about the actors, or that they should have been paying better attention or whatever. They played nice, and ignored issues they probably shouldn't have to stay on good terms. Now they are showing poor sportsmanship (as are ABC) because they feel like they did that for nothing. It's childish? Sure! But it doesn't change the legal bottom line here--they DO have a valid case (if it went to court would it be upheld? Who knows, but they have a *case*). Bottom line :P

And I wish they'd just all drop it--as I said back on page one.

  • Members
Posted

If ABC does not air the ads, PP should sue them. Outside of this, the morons need to drop this and keep it moving. PP has started off poorly, very poorly. First, they can't get the project off the ground, then once they do, they don't get their characters back from GH. Instead, they play "let's make a deal" and try to share the characters to get their hands on the performers [ABC/GH was smart to call this off]. Now, they want to launch a sour grapes suit when they really should be focusing on these 2 shows. I would have found a charismatic actor to replace Roger on day one! All PP has done here is to make certain that fans will tune in to see Roger and take off when he does. The audience should be focusing on the return of OLTL and not the return of RH, ME and KA.

It must be painful when you screw yourself.

  • Members
Posted

Actually I believe this was more about ABC refusing to promote the reboots on ABC. As with many lawsuits, they threw everything in there they possibly could for leverage. They wanted the URLs and the appearances on The View and Kelly and Michael and GMA and Katie etc. They already got the URLs and I bet they get the rest. ABC wanted the characters as much as PP wanted the actors.

  • Members
Posted

Because ABC played dirty. If General Hospital wanted to employ Howarth, Easton and that other one, that's great. Create new characters. But to bring them on as their OLTL characters and then sign them to a contract KNOWING the characters they're playing are licensed to Prospect Park is dirty pool. If ABC went with the plan to create new characters for the actors to begin with, none of this would be happening and Prospect Park wouldn't have a leg to stand on. However, they didn't because ABC wanted to use the OLTL actors and characters to bring the OLTL audience to GH. Yet Prospect Park wants to do the same to bring the OLTL audience back to OLTL and that's wrong?

And as for the "why didn't Prospect Park say anything until now" rhetoric... Are we sure they haven't? Didn't Valentini say something about how Natalie couldn't come over to GH for the John the Deadbeat Father storyline because of legalese surrounding the character and Prospect Park? Maybe that was part of a larger discussion about using the characters on GH. We don't know!

  • Members
Posted

Yes that did happen. Maybe PP didnt allow any more OLTL characters because of what GH did to Cole & Hope. And like said before they were killed by their 2nd show, so PP couldnt do jack about it.

Maybe PP thought it be better to work thru it first or try & thats why they didnt sue before now..

  • Members
Posted

Matters not that ABC/GH played dirty when all PP had to do was get their characters and keep it moving. They CHOSE not to do that. Instead, they hoped that they could use ABC/GH's influence with the performers and convince them to come over to OLTL at least part of the time. PP wanted something just like GH. They simply are not as good at playing this game, but perhaps they will get better at being dirty (their hands are hardly clean).

If PP said something prior to now, why'd GH continue to focus heavily on the 3 characters, and why did FL return at least 2 times after this breech. Why did KDP return? Why did GH use Tomas at all? This is nothing more than two people who decide they are going to get into a boxing ring together and fight. One gets a black eye and cries foul.

What we do know? Again, all of this could have been avoided had PP just taken their characters and recast them, something they have to do anyway. Dumb asses!

Read above...

  • Members
Posted

I can read and that doesnt change the 3 FACTS that are defintley breached

1) The use of the Tomas Chracter that PP never loaned to them

2) The ULRS being kept from PP for months

3) ABC not wanting to Air OLTL ads because RH is in them. Even though PP already paid in full for their ads to run

PP has these shows for 10 years. They have not waited too long to sue. Hell Production companies sue each other over film & TV shows that came out years if not decades earlier

ABC is in the wrong here. Yes PP has been shady but ABC broke their part of the contract & for that should & hopefully will be found liable.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I’m thoroughly confused why she won’t say anything to Joss. Joss obviously has no intention of telling her.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He knows from Nicole and Anita   Also good point
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Ted also stays at the hotel and Vernon is probably aware of that. As much as Ted wants to be back in Nicole's good graces he might feel obligated to tell if he saw Vernon coming out of a woman's room since keeping secrets got him in so much trouble before.
    • One more thing on Tuesday's episode, did anyone else notice the weird blocking? Belle and Eric were thanking Sarah, and worrying about Lyme Disease (which must be a red herring, I can't believe we're watching a PSA about inspecting for tics).  Then, Belle turned to EJ and threatened him with a lawsuit.  EJ acted as if he hadn't heard the entire conversation that was happening two inches away from him.   I like EJ, but a little of silly/mean EJ goes a long way.  His sarcasm during that scene felt out of place, regardless of Eric's presence.  When he bugs his eyes, and feigns innocence, it is a little too OTT for my taste.  I understand that he was the punching bag for most scenes, but EJ feels more mature than resorting to funny faces.  Isn't rather quick to worry about Stephanie's sales, she just debuted the book yesterday in their timeline?  And why is everyone against Jada and Theo?  Jada could use a boytoy, and this doesn't feel like a "forever" romance.
    • I dont think he knew Leslie was staying there. I know this is all for the drama and mess which Im here for, but Vernon really could have easily rented a small studio space where he and Sharon could practice lol.
    • I understand that no one could ever replace Bernau, but Ron Raines is somewhat of a different beast. Still great (to me) though. He spent his entire TV run in one role, that was impossible to do justice correctly. 
    • Again, Bernau's illness impacted that. It's pretty obvious Pilon was always meant to be temporary. I read an article from that period that said he was working on both Ryan's Hope and GL at the same time. So he wasn't on contract for either show. (Maybe that explains somewhat why his performance was so low energy, because he was overworked doing two soaps). Later, they put him in the opening and in commercials for the show. That must have been because they were certain Bernau was not returning. Around that time, they approached Zaslow about being the permanent replacement for Bernau. He turned them down and suggested coming back as Roger. Pilon stayed so they could re-introduce Roger and write an exit for Alan. I'm guessing if MZ had not wanted to come back, they would have had no choice but to keep Pilon (which I don't think they wanted, or maybe Pilon wasn't interested) or send out a casting call for a new Alan. I think they wanted to avoid that because they were really determined not to let the nature of Bernau's illness to become public knowledge. At this point, they were still keepin up the fiction that he was going to return even while this stuff was happening BTS.   Yeah, it seems crazy now, but people forget how stigmatized AIDS was back then. I'm convinced the idea to ask Zaslow to take the role came about so they could replace Bernau as quietly as possible. Everyone would have been so surprised it would have taken the focus off Bernau not returning. It makes a kind of twisted sense. Still, thank goodness Zazlow said no and they said yes to his suggestion to return as Roger. The way everything worked out gave GL a few more strong years. I guess it's the nature of soaps, you never know what things in real life will end up strongly impacting the show, both negatively and positively. (Something just occurred to me. If Zazlow HAD said yes to playing Alan...he would have had to play being in love with Reva.

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy