Jump to content

What words are overused/misused in the soap fanbase?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I use the word stan sometimes but only in its actual intended use. Stan=Stalker fan. I only use it on the really really crazy fangurls who get overly emotional about the faves and know every little detail of the actors lives( bring up dms on twitter to prove their points in arguements). Like the kind that get so upset that you don't like their faves that they have little board meltdowns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I agree because if you don't like what you are seeing to the point you feel they are forcing you, turn of the TV. I started watching soaps in 2008 and the only I watched regularly until OLTL came back was AMC. I hated Ryan/Greenlee and some of the others so I either fast-forwarded there scenes or just closed my eyes for a while. If you can't watch a show because of a certain character or whatever try writing a letter to the production company and like they say snail mail is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally, one thing that has kept me from posting here as much as I used to is a lot of the phrases that are currently being thrown around in this thread. Hack, propping, "shoved down our throats"...

Any time that someone doesn't like what a writer has written, it's all of a sudden that they're a hack! Any time someone doesn't like a character that is being featured heavily, that character is being propped and shoved down our throats. What really makes me laugh is when people start saying, "I guess we're supposed to like this" or "we're supposed to feel this"...um, no. No one is telling you what to feel. A writer has written a STORY and like all pieces of fiction, you can feel however you want and just because maybe you aren't feeling or seeing the story in the way the writer maybe intended, it doesn't make what they have written any less valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think this was true at one time, but not in recent years of soaps. Writers have repeatedly gone to the press saying they intended a story a certain way and they sometimes seem offended when fans don't react the right way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
This is not true. They purposely change characters' personalities and motivations to fit the story and to try to force feed viewers into disliking characters and root for another. Prime example on GH is TJ all of a sudden being a jealous, violeny maniac beating up on the poor, brooding orphan Rafe.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Knock(ed) it out of the park"

Usually used for an upcoming storyline. I remember it stood out most when DAYS was going to kill Zach and everyone was saying KA is "going to knock this out of the park." Well, she didn't and the story devolved into something pretty lame. (An actor can only do so much with "weak material" - another favorite term of mine.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This exactly what I'm talking about. Sometimes people in the real world are hot heads and they do things they shouldn't. No one is making you see Rafe as the victim or TJ as the villain. It's a story and if you think TJ is justified, then you could root for him if you wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right. Most people can and will change over time and act out of line that said I think some writers need to work on execution but I have noticed everytime someone here complains about a character change and bring up Douglas Marland's rule about not changing a character without an explanation the next episode will literally explain why that character changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Poor Philip. I appreciate how seriously his and Xander’s scenes were taken though. It felt like real drama and not like a big joke. You could actually feel Xander’s pain and anger. It adds another dynamic to the Kiriakis family storylines and I’m looking forward to the effects that this is going to have across the canvas. I can see them weaving Kate and Roman into this storyline as well. And it would be really nice if this somehow helped cause conflict for Stephanie/Alex too, especially because of what Alex did today. With any luck, Stephanie will be furious about it.  And I’m glad that Sarah has Maggie to confide in about her secret. I also liked seeing Steve and Shawn (and their matching jackets

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) continue to be on the case. Kevin, revealing everything to them is another interesting turn in this storyline. Plus, it seems the writing has improved for Shawn as well. 
    • TBF, I don't think we've seen her interact enough with the "have-nots" to know if she is or isn't. It's possible, but I don't think you can say that from her interactions with Eva and Silkpress.
    • You're right - though I did confuse his name with an actual actor who was on Dynasty.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • "Might" is not "is". And I was talking about the specific case about her attitude to Eva. 
    • But she can still be a priveliged elitist. She might have the same attitude to anyone from 'the wrong side of the tracks' whether they had an agenda or not. Nicole seems to be an outlier in her family.Her parents, kids and sister seem to think themselves above reproach.
    • Damian's clothes have definitely been a specific look -kinda reads 70's pimp to me . I guess it's a trend?? but it seems more suited to Holden. JR is 51  and I guess Damian is supposed to be a little younger but it looks a little odd on him in my book. But at least they're trying. The men's clothing has been bland/generic for years-either suits or basic casual stuff interchangeable  b/w them.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy