Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Members

That was a terribly written article. Whether or not its true remains to be seen but I highly doubt PP would make such a huge investment to start TOLN to walk away from AMC & OLTL at this point. In business isn't the rule of thumb to lose money initially but over time you begin making a profit or a return on the investment?

I definitely want BOTH shows back and I am not willing to throw in the towel yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's November 2011 all over again.

But maybe because of the lawsuit PP can't say anything? Isn't that often the case with legal matters? I'm not defending their quietness, but I assumed it was because of that, although I still feel like it's November 2011 all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I made this argument elsewhere, but at this point, what can PP say that would make fans happy? If they say "We're filming on X date," and it doesn't happen, fans will be upset. A significant portion of the fanbase probably won't believe them until AMC actually starts shooting anyway, so PP would still have a bunch of naysayers online insisting it won't happen. If they say "We're shelving AMC until further notice," fans are going to be upset. They've said they're working on it and that they plan to do a second season, but there's no official date for that yet, and of course, fans are upset.

FTR, I do think they badly mishandled a lot of PR opportunities, but what's done is done. At this point though, I don't know that there's anything they can say that is going to make people happy.

As for the Globe, I don't consider it to be a reputable source. If the higher ups at PP say in an article with, say, the LA Times, that they're canceling the show, then I'll believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Many people may not like what I put on twiiter but news is needed:

@TOLN Seriously! Its cancelled! http://m.celebdirtylaundry.com/2013/all-my-children-one-life-to-live-cancelled-prospect-park-1101/

I don't actually believe this article but others will and raise hell then PP will have to say something.

As for those people who got upset over everything, it always turned out they were wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well given that the actors continue to state that the shows will have a second season Ill believe the actors

Also the Globe article doesnt tell us anything we dont know already

We already knew there was no firm dates for production to resume

Sounds like Celeb Dirty Laundry came late to the party & wants to sound relevant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think they need to make us happy. If they tell us the truth as they know it to be right now and people don't like it, so what? How is that worse than people losing interest due to lack of info? Not people who are on SON, we aren't the norm. Many of us will come running back whenever these shows return, but I think the general audience would be more likely to stay engaged if there were some sort of update.

Ultimately, they don't owe us anything, but I wouldn't mind an official update. I'm still rooting for these shows, but what will be will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation.  I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy