Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of January


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This one tweeter kept tweeting him ideas of long time fan favorites he'd like to see back for the 50th anniversary, like Audrey, Lee, Gail, Bobbie, Lesley, etc and Ron ignored every last one of them and continued his pointless vampire arguments. Sigh.

EDIT: Their name is ackghsomething and Im pretty sure they post on this board cause I know I've seen their name before somewhere!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haha, you're right. Robert should probably be at the top of the list. But Anna wins best female commissioner by default laugh.png .

And in Mac's defense, he hadn't been in town for long when Robert went missing in 1992. wink.png

Actually, that would be an interesting ranking: Best PC commissioner? Robert, Anna, Sean Donely and Mac would be on the list, but who else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please, VH! That clown blocked everybody, so he would have to look at his mentions or the GH TL to see what is being said. None of that stuff shows up on his TL, so he goes looking for it. Ron does not have to say a word, but the queen in him won't allow him to STFU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could be mistaken about the TL thing. Someone can correct me if they know better...

Anyone, if you are blocked, will your tweets show on the TL of someone who blocked you?

As for Ron, sure, check up and see what folks are saying, and if it's constructive, take note. If it's whining, ignore it. Ron's bitch fights show his insecurities. It's almost as if he knows he a lousy writer and completely lacking.

I have asked him about Sean Blakemore on numerous occassions, asked about who Carly is, asked what is going on with Sonny, etc, but I have never gotten any responses. Ron only takes on questions where he knows a cat fight will ensue and has nothing to do with the creative process. Quite the bitch, I tell yah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not at all. But I think RC has a problem about taking it too personally, which you can't in his position. To read, to reply vaguely politely when you want, or often not at all is very very smart. To get all defensiv with a series of tweets, etc, is I think something someone in his position should just force themselves not to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy