Jump to content

Angst and soap couples


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't know if this will get any responses, but it takes my mind off Sandy and other things, so...

Angst has always been a major part of dramas, including soaps. In recent years, this seems to have blown up, with the advent of all the moody, endlessly covered material like Twilight or Hunger Games, and with Youtube and tumblr which can be devoted to a million fanvids and gifs of sad music or sorrowful, longing stares.

You might say soaps wrote the book on angst, since they used to say fans should wait, wait, wait for a happy ending, that when couples are happy, they are dull, so it's time for more trauma. Yet soaps have completely failed in tapping into this new era of angst.

Why is that?

I'd say it's because of horrid pacing. 5 days a week should be a gift in building up these relationships, but instead most soaps just have the same few scenes again and again, while rushing through buildup, never bothering to focus on consequences.

There's also no time in-between for happy moments. On GH, Sam and Jason were back together with baby Danny for about ten seconds before Jason was killed off. You could say that was great, Jason sucks anyway, but it just sort of makes the whole thing an anticlimax.

Do you prefer happy couples, couples who constantly have trauma and fight their way through trauma, or somewhere in-between?

I guess I'd say in-between (Cass and Kathleen, Tom and Margo up to the mid 90s).

Who do you consider the most angst-ridden couple on a soap? There are so many, but I'd probably say Shane and Kimberly (someone on jwsel's blog for them once said they were the only "supercouple" Stefano never targeted because they were already very good at tearing each other apart).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvHrapjcWUY&playnext=1&list=PL29470BA307CF1F0B&feature=results_video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85cdNSDKaKs&feature=relmfu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh man I couldnt take Kim and Shane I found them a bore. Perhaps maybe too much angst haha. No I don't know if too much angst but they seemed like there was rarely much happy between the things that brought them apart.

My faves I'd say Bo and Hops first run.

Jack and Jenns first run.

Are my two faves from Days.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhcdIklW4K0

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well I reread ur post to see the actual question haha. So yes Kim and Shane were def. the most angst ridden then. Because they went through a lot of serious crap!

Tho Jack and Jenn sure have had a ton of crap done to them over the last two decades too. But mostly because of awful writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's funny, because I was going to mention Jack and Jennifer as an example of the failures of modern soaps. Jack returning after being tortured and having severe PTSD, and Jennifer giving up on his love for her, should have been incredible, beautiful angst, a story that should have lasted for a long time and provided them with fantastic material.

The decision to instead have this as an obstacle for her love for Daniel (!) was when I think I truly gave up on MarDar.

That "rape slap" clip is the type of soap angst which just kills the viewer, and has so many layers. And, sadly, what we don't get anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't even really say, the memory would have to go back a long way. The last time I even cared that much about a soap couple would probably be...damn, it's been a long time. Probably someone on OLTL. I thought Natalie's grieving over Jared was very powerful, until they dropped it in a hot minute. Some of the Kyle/Fish stuff, early on, before Stacey got pregnant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The most angst ridden soap couple was Ethan and Theresa on Passions. They had fleeting moments of happiness but overall it took them 8 years and cancellation to finally get them together once and for all with no threat of drama looming to end them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Zach and Kendall on AMC all they got was non stop angst. Even as someone who shipped them it got to be too much after awhile. It's like the show was afraid to allow them 5 seconds of happiness. They had alot of angst in a short period of time to top it off

Mallory from serial drama once commented on this:

"All My Children could benefit from some good cheer, starting with Zach and Kendall. I know they say a happy soap couple is only meant for the back burner, but the rapid-fire succession of obstacles thrown at the pair is downright comical; a serial killer, critically ill sons AND being trapped in a bomb shelter? That's a parody of a soap."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not counting the doofus who fell for his stalker. One of the most vomit inducing pairings EVER! Luis and Sheridan had way too much angst. Reilly tortured the chit out of them and didn't even give them a happily ever after - not that I could even stomach the end or anything close to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for opening a thread like this. I have often asked myself this question. In fact, I think it is THE question plaguing soaps today. I used to watch Daytime for some proper romantic escapism. I don't mean some cheap parody of what a smart-aleck, very meta writer thinks is "romantic escapism," but the real thing -- beautiful written, heartfelt, convincingly played, honest-to-god romantic feeling. Writers like Pam Long, Bridget and Jerome Dobson, and Sheri Anderson were master of this kind of writing. And at one time JER and Claire Labine were, too.

You mention Twilight or the Hunger Games. I think the fans of these book/movie franchises (and I admit I couldn't put the first Hunger Games novel down) are not really catered to in many other forms of media. These fans would and should be prime target audiences for Daytime soaps. Back in the 80s and some of the 90s, their desire for sweeping, continuous romance-filled drama would have been partially satiated by what Daytime had to offer. It is also no coincidence that when I first started watching Daytime in 1987, my consumption of romance and historical novels by authors like Celeste de Blasis soared. One genre seemed to feed into the other.

Your point about the horrid pacing is the most valid answer. I remember MAB not so long ago talking about "her" supercouples on Y&R. She mentioned Phick (barf but I understand why she picked em), Nikki & Victor (who only have to stand on an empty soundstage for the audience to project their long, tumultuous history onto them) and Victoria & Billy. The last pairing stunned me. They got drunk and went to Jamaica... got married, 3 weeks later they were married for real, in love (allegedly) and talking about founding a family. No build-up, no nothing. Back in the day, it would have taken YEARS to get to that particular result. I think it illustrates a profound lack of imagination and patience amongst HWs today.

I would also say that soaps were once written by women (in some, not all, cases) and expressly FOR women. They catered to their audience knowing they wanted drama, angst and romance. Writers like Long and Anderson seemed to enjoy writing that kind of dramatic, intensely romantic fare. Nowadays, HWs write to please their bosses (usually male, usually deeply uninterested in Daytime as a genre in its own right, and usually obsessed with the bottom line) rather than the audience. They also write to cater to a select handful of diva actors they feel pull in what little audience is left.

I, for one, would really love the romance back, but I think you already probably guessed that, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is no such thing as happy couples on soaps! But in the past there was balance where certain great supercouples had some happiness and together-time before the next great drama came sweeping into their lives.

The couples that had me tingling [i know that sounds weird, but I was literally breathless in anticipation after school was over as a kid, rushing home (if I didn't have sports) to catch a show and see what was going on with the couples I loved] were:

- Cruz & Eden (SB), probably the most tortured, angst-filled couple in soaps, to the point where you knew it was going to end tragically with these two.

- Steve & Kayla (Days). So many romantic, tender moments!

- Mason & Julia (SB). The best writing I have ever seen on TV for a couple -- reminded me of great old movie like It Happened One Night and The Philadelphia Story.

- Carly & Lawrence (Days).

- Billie & Bo (Days).

- John & Marlena (Days).

- Duke & Anna (GH).

- Sonny & Brenda (GH).

- Caroline & Ridge (B&B )

- Lily & Holden (ATWT).

- Jake & Marley (AW).

- Vicky & Ryan (AW)

The last angsty coupling I really got into was Carly & Lorenzo on GH and Vicky & Ryan on AW (which I only discovered after its cancellation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sonny and Brenda and John and Marlena were my fave couples in the 90's and they were so angsty. I don't know how I sat through the YEARS of misunderstandings and almost reunions. I think the key to both those stories were interesting interlopers (Jax and Kristen) and stories that weren't totally played out at the time (ie. Sonny's abuse as a child and fear of a loved one getting hurt by his business were actually fresh at the time). I like angst. It keeps a story interesting, especially when you know they are endgame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Today's soaps just don't know how to do well written angst, or pathos.

I can remember though, watching in the 80s and 90s and the angst was so darn palpable, one could barely stand it!

One angst ridden couple I can think of were 80s Craig & Sierra-ATWT.

There's a couple of scenes in Spring of 1986 where Craig and Sierra (who was married to someone else) almost combusted but the scene ended in a near scandal between Craig and Lucinda (it's almost too complicated to offer a concise explanation).

My favorite lines are when Craig is kissing Sierra, who's attempting to resist (but not really) and she asks plaintively "What are you trying to do to me?!" and Craig replies something like (and I'm paraphrasing) "Baby, when I'm in bed alone, I think of you... and when you're in bed with Tonio, you're not thinking of him, you're thinking of me!" Oh, my!ohmy.png Even back then my adolescent know that was exciting and it's even hotter now, years later.

But the couple was always being torn apart by secrets, lies, misunderstandings, meddlers and even wars and revolutions. They were largely an unexplored couple but they burned HOT for the brief time they were on ATWT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I love my girl, but nope he's pathetic. 250K and now he's put her business at risk.   L O S E R    

      Please register in order to view this content

    • The whole town gushing over John Black as if he was a saint is eye rolling.  I guess death really colors people's memories over his many flaws, but I guess that is normal and human nature. I'm still confused as to why Leo hasn't been written out.  The actor stank up two soaps with his sub par acting, what does he have on TPTB's to remain on these soaps.   What's the point of Cat?  I hope the new head-writers figure out her purpose and develop her character. And I much prefer scenes not focusing on John's death because life does go on for the world when someone passes.  
    • Wasn't there a break in Zaslow's first run? I thought Roger was off-screen for a while, and when Zas came back, Roger was hiding at the boarding house and Nola figured out there was something hinkey about him. I'm pretty sure Simon chose to leave the first time and was replaced by RVV. I don't want to assume Jordan's issues played a role in his first departure, but Maeve said in an interview that at some point, it became very hard for her to work with him and she asked to work with him less. That seems to fit 1986, where suddenly Vanessa is essentially Ross' law clerk and not at every Lewis family moment.
    • He needs to divorce her arse with her constant cheating.   She's no better than Doug... she's F*cking pathetic.
    • I didn't know of any interruptions for Maeve Kinkead after her 1997 return. Her runs would then be 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-2000, short arcs until the end. I knew Maureen Garrett second run was interrupted from a 2009 interview but I couldn't recall the exact year. Her runs would then be 1976-1980, 1988-2000, short arcs until the end.
    • As I said in May, I have no problem with Martin and Bradley being married. You can still do all the fun introloper storylines with them as you do everyone else. Both men of a certain age, and it is very believable for them to have either a first love or have been previously married. And, you can do it without either of them cheating!  

      Please register in order to view this content

       I said something similar during the premiere week. Bill was the perfect age to play Martin as Vernon and Anita's child. I would've much preferred this version, but oh well.
    • I don't know how you want to count Maeve. She "retired" in '00, but would come back for appearances. I don't know however if she made an appearance in '01 or '03. In '02 I believe she came back for Josh and Reva's wedding. I assume she came back when Gina Tognoni took over the role of Dinah. And I know she was back for Ross' memorial service. Maureen Garrett was around until at least '00. I don't think Holly was in town when Ben returned though. I just got pissed off about Jerry all over again.
    • So, pretty sure Zaslow, Garrett, Kinkead, and Newman all chose to leave the first time. (If that's wrong, please correct me). Bernau - not sure why he left the first time. Was it voluntary? Or did they decide to write him out? They were writing so many out during that time period. It always seemed odd to me that they introduced Alex, FINALLY giving him someone he could talk to, and then he was written out. Or maybe that's why they made Alex his sister, so she could take his place as the head of the Spaulding family? Would love more intel on that if anyone knows. Simon - was he replaced by RVV? Or did he voluntarily leave the first time? It seems to me like one of those times TPTB decided to sex up or glamorize a character (and it clearly flopped). If he was fired, interesting he came back. Again, would love if someone could spill the tea. Clarke - I've always assumed he left because of his personal issues, but not sure if that was the case the first time.
    • So Doug just leaves Vanessa there with Joey? He's a f*cking loser. Vanessa needs to divorce his arse 
    • Tina Sloan tied Jerry VerDorn record when Guiding Light was cancelled - 26 years uninterrupted 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy