Members Mr. Vixen Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 Wow I loved those scenes - It takes a great actress to be able to look like she's actually thinking what the voiceover is saying, and RM nailed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members frequentsoapfan Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 We didn't need the voiceover. It was lame an unecessary just liek the flashbacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 I didn't think she looked like that, honestly - I thought it sounded so choppy, like those computerized voices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members frequentsoapfan Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 Neither did I. It was just bad to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 Lazy. Just plain lazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 I hated the camera work but loved RM in the scenes and liked the voiceover. I thought overall it was good and served a purpose in establishing why Heather hates Sam and did what she did. The flashbacks of Sam threatening her and being nasty highlighted how exaggerated that came across to someone as crazy as Heather. Her motivation was pretty clear after that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 If it took that long to come up with a reason then they shouldn't have bothered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 And it's a pretty weak reason, too, if you ask me. I could understand if Franco were Heather's son, and she held Sam and Jason responsible for his death, so she switched the babies because she felt her grandchild was better off NOT being raised by the two. But she did it because Sam threatened her? Say what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 I think the whole idea is, "She's crazy, she can do anything!" Which means they can make it up as they go along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JaneAusten Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 I can't tell from that clip what her motive is supposed to be. Granted I haven't been watching the show but she's doing it because she's mad at Sam? That's all I got from the clip. I assume there has been deeper motivation than this shown on screen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members John Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 Heather is crazu. She is mad Sam didnt give the letter to Steven. Yes seems dumb but Heather is not rational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 Sam tried to keep her from her son when she didn't deliver the letter. Sam threatened to make her lose her son after she was reunited with him. In Heather's mind, Sam tried to go after her through her son, so she went after her through hers. I don't know, it makes sense to me especially after seeing her rationale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JaneAusten Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 None of that was really touched on in the flashback. What letter and how was she going to lose him? I said I assumed that's been part of the story but the clip they showed with Sam didn't really explain that at all. I said I haven't really been watching and that flashback with Sam really didn't clarify much towards her motivation if that was it's intent was to update lapsed viewers on Heathers reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 The letter was mentioned yesterday. When Heather was locked up, she made a deal with Sam. She would give her the info behind Jason's connection to Franco if Sam would help her reunite with Steven by delivering a letter to him. Sam double crossed her by getting Heather to spill but then ran out of there without taking her letter to Steven. That was the catalyst for her hatred against Sam. Since then she's had several run ins with Sam in which Sam threatened to turn Steven against her by exposing how she sold Franco at birth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cyberologist Posted June 12, 2012 Members Share Posted June 12, 2012 yeah I knew it would be much ado about nothing; I read a spoiler months ago that it would be Jason's wasn't sure if it had aired or what-not...I watch a couple times a week now.. Re: Heather's motive for paternity switch the letter she wrote for Steven Lars was not delivered therefore she wants revenge.because she gave up the info re: Susan Moore's delivery of twins & one was taken Heather didn't get what she wanted out of the deal they made her conditions were clear I tell then you deliver.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.