Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of May


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This DID story is too stupid for me to even go as in-depth with it as you guys have, lol. I just don't have the energy or desire to analyze it all. I do enjoy it because it's so batshit crazy and KS is such a hot mess and it's fun, IMO. But the story is completely senseless and for it to make any sense, it would have to rely on Kate being super anxious about reentering Sonny's life under GW, which she wasn't. She fought romantically reuniting with him, but she started re-associating with him after Olivia asked her to after, like, two times. And she only seemed mildly uncomfortable and the couple voiceover flashbacks to the wedding shooting didn't have enough weighty effect to be the 'signs' that she was terrified enough for an alter ego to protect her to emerge.

To me, RC's Connie is Kate's alter. Whereas Connie Falconeri and Kate Howard are the same character, just at different points in her life. Connie/Kate just evolved as a person over time, albeit because she forced the change in an effort to completely reinvent herself. But Guza and GW repeatedly displayed that Connie was gentle, understanding and instrumental in keeping Sonny from completely going off the deep end, even though that's exactly what happened when she left him. She may've been all Brooklyn like Lois and Olivia, but she wasn't, as NeNe Leakes says, a "trashy hooker" and she definitely wasn't a destructive psychopath. This Connie alter is definitely not the girlhood/teenage Connie we've been hearing about for the past five years.

But Olivia's motivations for keeping Dante from Sonny have also changed multiple times and make no sense. This wave of Bensonhurst characters' back-stories have not been well done, did the last wave (Lois and Cates boys) have such all-over-the-place back-stories, too? Even Dante's back-story with Brenda makes no sense. We know all these Bensonhurst characters grew up on the same block; he wouldn't ever have met Lois' best friend, Brenda? At a family thing--something? There wouldn't have been any talk of her being with the well-known-'round-those-parts Sonny? Something? Anything?

Anyway, even more than the DID, my biggest problem with Kate is how she looks. I think KS is really pretty and could look like Kate, but the styling for her is atrocious, regardless of any role she'd play. But especially Kate Howard. This broad looks nothing like a famous fashionista, from the hair to the makeup to the (espically!) wardrobe. Kate and Maxie's short hair is actually part of their external characterization to me, and that was my first problem with KS and then it became evident that the wardrobe department forgot how to dress the Kate character. That's what I want fixed even more than the stupid DID story, LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hater Yellgado has some damn nerve throwing some shade at Alexis for being a "mouthpiece for the Mob" when her entire damn career in soapland has consisted of defending criminal vermin like her "dead" husband, Frodd.

I don't even like Alexis and wished that she verbally shanked that bipolar banshee's ass.

My Todd discussing his love for my Blair to the bootleg version of Blair just made my miss my favorite bitch with a heart so much. Because it always bears repeating - Starr's mother needs to be here to support her troubled daughter instead of that bogarting bitch that Cartini insisted on bringing over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

After years of watching various DID storylines, this is the first one that I don't get, but I'm going to ride it out and stop taking it too seriously. I'm going to also stop over-thinking the Bensonhurst gang.

I agree that Kate dresses like she shops at TJ Maxx. Her look is completely wrong, but maybe that has to do with the show's budget.

I've always liked Tea, but I get the feeling that I'm in the minority on that one. I like that she's loud and sassy. Which one did Todd hit in the face with a shovel, Tea or Blair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He punched Tea out. She hit him with the shovel.

Tea has plenty of fans and all kinds of hype. She always has. The problem is her stories are always garbage because they mostly focus on how awesome she is and how everyone else (aside from her kids and the rapists she loves) sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

lol at Heather. She is so mean to the GH nurses.

Patrick was compelling to watch this week

RH was embarrasing to watch in those Todd/Tea scenes on Thursday. I thought I had seen worse acting from him until that point!

He's been feeling guilty and having little flash memories of killing Lisa since the end of Maxie's trial.

LOL!!

GH011712.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy