Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of May


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That is what baffles me about this story. I think must soaps have been consistent that DID is the result of childhood drama (sexual/physical abuse). We have been told that Connie was this wild child hellraiser and troublemaker that one day decided to leave Bensonhurst, change her ways, change her name and go to college. We assumed that was a conscious decision.

So are we also to assume that little girl Connie was more like Kate and developed bad girl Connie to protect who we know as Kate from some type of abuse? Connie was in control throughout her teens, then Kate came into play when she wanted out of Bensonhurst and that Connie lay dormant all these years until Kate was shot at the wedding? Is there a gatekeeper like Jean Randolph pulling all the strings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The part I loved the most was Todd saying how much he missed everyone when he was imprisoned--even Tea, although he couldn't figure out at that moment why (join the club-seriously, hating Tea actually felt good yesterday, how much do I miss my show? But there it is.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's what makes no sense. For all intensive purposes Connie existed first. History has told us that much from Sonny's stories about how wild Kate/Connie was when she was younger. So how can Kate be the main alter? Are we supposed to believe Connie just now manifested or has she been popping out all threw out her childhood and adult years? None of it really makes any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you! This is my point exactly! Kate is a name Connie pulled from the sky to fit the lifestyle she was going to have. Before idiots 1 & 2 came along, there was not a hint of DID!

Are we to believe Connie conjured up Kate to smooth out the rough edges and then create chaos as a reason to be both people? This is simply convoluted chit and Johnny is no rapist!

ANDREA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually Connie being a wildchild was a complete rewrite as before we were told Connie wasn't the wildchild. She was the hardworking young girl who really wanted to work in fashion, created her versions of the runway styles at home using her sewing machine, and turned her nose down on the neighborhood. Kate was the anglo name she chose as to not be associated with the old neighborhood and the Italian stereotypes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even when & If Vic shows up alive why should Tea apologize to Todd. Todd still kidnapped her brother, Tomas and held him captive, forcing him to confess to victor's murder. Todd did not kill Victor but he still abducted Tomas. He's far from innocent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She was wild with Sonny, Megan Ward's Kate and Sonny both talked about how they would act out and be wild during their early Bensonhurst days, but she repressed it when she left and went to school for whatever reason. That was the whole thing about Kate and Sonny's relationship that Kate didn't want to be in love with Sonny because he represented her Bensonhurst days which were the complete and polar opposite of who she wanted to be as a Fashion Queen. That was the whole conflicted character thing that culminated in Kate.

I didn't say Kate was an alter. I said this whole thing about Kate vs. Connie doesn't make sense. The show has gone on record saying that Connie existed first and that she created the alternative identity in Kate to exist in the fashion world and distance herself from the Bensonhurt life, whatever that is supposed to mean. There could be a case made for either of them being the dominant personality. Considering she is known as both personalities and as both people. Connie however is her given name from birth. Look at some quotes that Megan Ward has gone on record talking about Connie and Kate even she references them as being a complete person and a complete entity that changes based on the scene. Once you read them you can see where the confusion comes from. Because Kate has existed and continues to exist just as Connie does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tea's a bitch! LMAO, at her vs Alexis. Too funny. "Your reputation preceeds you. Mouthpiece for the mob"

Yes you did. You asked how can Kate be the main alter and I clarified that she isnt an alter

Kate Howard is an identity that Connie Falconeri created for herself to make it easier to leave her old life behind and enter the fashion industry. She is the same person, but with a name change. I liken it to Carly who's original name was Caroline Benson but changed her nme and came on as Carly Roberts. Still the same person

According to the show since reuniting with Sonny, Kate's psyche has split and created an alternate personality named Connie, based on her teen years. This Connie was created for the sole reason to protect Kate bc she feels Sonny is too dangerous for her (as a result of her being shot the last time they were together). Connie is completely one dimensional and represents wildness, lack of inhibition and she does what she feels is best for Kate, even if it ends up hurting others bc she is not concerned for them. She is not real or a whole person which is why she is so out there representing but one side to Kate, a side she has repressed in order to adjust to the new life she created for herself.

So0 bottom line. Kate is NOT an alter. She is the host, the main persona and has always existed. Connie is an alter, and a result of her mental illness.

They probably should have just named this alter a different name like Bonnie to avoid confusion but it is what it is and really not that hard to follow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wasn't Tea in deep with the Montez crime family? Or were they not supposed to be bad (just a family of killers and psychos)?

I never understand why they write Tea as enabling rape and murder and yet still passing judgment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tea speaking spanish to Badea. wub.png

The Montez werent a mob family. Tea worked for Ray Montez who started on the show in a Columbia prison for murdering his first wife, a crime he did not commit. Tea helped him get off of that charge when his second wife, Vanessa confessed to the murder.It eventually came out that his daughter Lola killed his first wife. Ray, himself was not a killer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy