Jump to content

B&B - May 2012 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I hate Skank Mama! She is pissed off that Steffy wont sign the divorce papers and demands that she does. Steffy signs them and she is still pissed off. Bitch STFU and make up your mind!

LOL...He's an officer of Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why is Steffy still Liam's screen saver? Is it simply to give us two pictures of the women he is torn between? Because I find it so circumspect that he would still have another woman as his screen saver while he is trying to marry Hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved the Hope and Steffy scenes. While I know there's a rivalry, I like that they've found and developed respect for each other and found some common threads between them other than Liam. I know ITA not showy or campy or high emotional stuff, but it comes across real and genuine. These 2 actresses have more chemistry together than either has with Scott Clifton.

Eh Stephanie is just as bad sticking her nose into Liam's business. She's no better than the Logans and their being busy bodies.

It was good seeing Deacon. I still dislike Bill the creep but I'm interested in seeing what they do with Deacon, hoping he and Bill end up as rivals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Deacon is a reminder of the biggest mistake she's ever made. I think having an affair with him was by far the WORST thing she ever did in her 25 year history on this show. It the sluttiest, dirtiest, messiest thing she got herself into. She doesnt regret having Hope, but she's tried to put that behind her as much as possible. I can see why she'd wouldnt want him back in her life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I forgot that Deacon was Bridget's (husband/boyfriend? I can't remember). Mistake aside, does she really think that he'd be a danger to his own daughter? From what I gathered from today's conversation, he has barely (if ever) been around Hope for her to determine that he'd be the end of her.

(Or maybe, I'm just projecting my own bias against keeping fathers away from their children because of whatever issues mothers have with them.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
The last time Deacon was in Hope's life was back when she was about 2 and he tried to get custody of her. He hasnt had much to do with her after that. Is he a danger? Brooke wouldnt know as she hasnt seen him in years. I didnt gather that she thought he'd be a danger to Hope, but that he'd bring alot of baggage, old drama and overall would be a major dissapointment to her, something Brooke doesnt feel Hope needs right now as she's planning her wedding. Deacon is a loser with an unstable life. He was about getting in trouble then and causing harm to get what he wants and thats what Brooke is going off of. She probably figures he'd use and exploit Hope, maybe for money (or in this case his freedom, which she doesnt know about yet)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The whole "I ripped up annulment papers...never mind" sequence was just too ridiculous for me and I had to take a break, but I decided to watch the last few episodes.

The triangle is too silly to care about now but I do echo what others have said that I like some of the Hope/Steffy scenes. I can see why people would prefer Steffy with more edge but it's nice to see that in the midst of all the love wrangling, both the characters have a little self-respect. Not common on soaps today.

I don't really understand why Justin was needed to go on a trip with Bill. It's not like the actor was on contract and had time they had to use up. I would rather they just have Bill talk to himself, a la JER soaps.

My head spun with the addition of dialogue like, "I don't want to destroy the girl," when that is basically what he's been trying to do for months. And then the, "I could wring [Deacon]'s neck myself," when he was on his way to get the guy out of prison. It smells like damage control writing.He brings up all my Stephanie issues (she always has had this whole "She destroys lives...but she's not that bad!" writing), minus Susan Flannery's acting talent.

The longer this goes on the more that I feel like some of these characters, especially Brooke, are behaving too passively. Endless variations of the same conversations and "oh yeah? says you!" type of back and forth.

Don Diamont's overacting in that jail scene was so annoying I was hoping Deacon would punch him. The closeups of Deacon's bloodshot eyes made me laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
    • I've accepted we'll probably never see any of the Roger/Holly 1976-1978 storyline. Whenever any of Roger/Holly 1979 and 1980 storylines surface, those are must watch as they set in motion everything we saw a decade later.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy