Jump to content
Email System Update

GH: Discussion for the Month of December

Mr. Vixen

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Juliajms Collaborator

Juliajms

Posted
  • Members
Posted

I think the writing for Liz changed according with her relationship wish Jason. When the show thought Liason was going to work out they made Liz out to be in the right. once that pairing ended, Liz became a manipulative bitch according to the writing. I have mixed feelings on it because I've been a long term Liz hater. Lately, I don't mind her so much, but I think it's because she has fewer reasons to smirk. Still, somehow it doesn't seem fair that nearly every time Jason or Sonny have a failed pairing it's the actress who pays/gets fired.

Were Liz/Lucky really engaged when he slept with Sarah? I could have sworn at the time Lucky had fallen out of love with Liz because of the brainwashing. I remember him telling her flat out that he no longer loved her, but she wouldn't accept it. Was that after he slept with Sarah?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Cheap21 Veteran

Cheap21

Posted
  • Members
Posted

they werent engaged, but they were together. She called off the engagement after he told her he didnt love her following their non-wedding. They were taking it slow and working on their issues. He started falling for Sarah on the side, which was easier bc he didnt have feelings for Liz. He should have just flat out ended things with her first

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
JaneAusten Community Regular

JaneAusten

Posted
  • Members
Posted

who said they didn't want it to work. I have heard several actors refer to Jason/Liz as being romeo and Juliet, starcrossed lovers kept apart by circumstances. For a pairing people claimed the show didn't want, there were certainly a lot of pairings and characters made to look wrong and bad for them. Lucky and Sam were both demonized, Lucky's BFF, brother, and sister all pimped them.

You can not like the story the show told thats fine but to claim they were written at least in 2006 and 2007 not to work IMO is not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
miche Newbie

miche

Posted
  • Members
Posted

How was GV Lucky demonize for Liz? He got to call her a whore plenty of time and a bad mother who was the reason why 'his' son got kidnapped. Nothing was ever his fault, ever. Even with him it was you were whoring out but we both made mistake. That was long before JJ came back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
JaneAusten Community Regular

JaneAusten

Posted
  • Members
Posted

GV's Lucky was turned into a loser for Liz. He was turned into a drug addict, cheated with Maxie to justify Liz and the great love of Liz and Jason. He actually lost his family and job due to his drug issue and again was headed to be made to look like a fool when Liz started boinking Nikolas. GV's Lucky was always portrayed as a loser and less of a man for both Jason and later Nikolas, How anyone bought GV's Lucky sucked in bed is beyond me. Sonny has called Carly a whore plenty and I don't see anyone crying about how bad her writing has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
JaneAusten Community Regular

JaneAusten

Posted
  • Members
Posted

Liz was the main factor. It wasn't until Liz Jason that they really took a sledgehammer to him. Proof is in the pudding. with Sam Lucky was sexy lite fun and desired a far cry from the black hole being with Liz put him in and once Lusam ended it started all over again where he was treated and portrayed as an obligation and child versus the sexy man he was with Sam. And Jason has that same suck the life out of effect on Sam Liz did on Lucky. But then I also feel the same about JJ's Lucky as I do Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
miche Newbie

miche

Posted
  • Members
Posted

Lucky was a loser when he became a cop, he was a loser when he went after and sleep with the same woman that Luke did. He was just a loser that Emily couldn't even gave him the time and day. GV Lucky was so pathetic he follow the law, he enforce the law and stay in one place according to Luke. His cowboy would have been an adventurer. And that was GV Lucky from 2003 to 2005. That was when Liz was with Ric/by herself and you couldn't even tell they were in the same circle. That is consistent with GV Lucky from that point forward.

And Sam was never a character from the day she came on screen, always the yes Sonny, yes Jason, Alexis is so evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Members
BigBangFan Newbie

BigBangFan

Posted
  • Members
Posted

I guess I could never get into the Liz character because of the village of men that were needed to kiss her ass

She can do no wrong in their eyes. And if someone does call her out(as they should) they will apologize for it the next day

They even used a dead kid to have Liz's enemy prop her

I can't stand characters like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Antoyne
      DAYS: June 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Antoyne · Posted

      John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
    • Liberty City
      BTG: June 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Liberty City · Posted

      Be glad it wasn't a Perry production. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • dragonflies
      BTG: June 2025 Discussion Thread

      By dragonflies · Posted

      I love my girl, but nope he's pathetic. 250K and now he's put her business at risk.   L O S E R    

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Soaplovers
      DAYS: June 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Soaplovers · Posted

      The whole town gushing over John Black as if he was a saint is eye rolling.  I guess death really colors people's memories over his many flaws, but I guess that is normal and human nature. I'm still confused as to why Leo hasn't been written out.  The actor stank up two soaps with his sub par acting, what does he have on TPTB's to remain on these soaps.   What's the point of Cat?  I hope the new head-writers figure out her purpose and develop her character. And I much prefer scenes not focusing on John's death because life does go on for the world when someone passes.  
    • P.J.
      Guiding Light Discussion Thread

      By P.J. · Posted

      Wasn't there a break in Zaslow's first run? I thought Roger was off-screen for a while, and when Zas came back, Roger was hiding at the boarding house and Nola figured out there was something hinkey about him. I'm pretty sure Simon chose to leave the first time and was replaced by RVV. I don't want to assume Jordan's issues played a role in his first departure, but Maeve said in an interview that at some point, it became very hard for her to work with him and she asked to work with him less. That seems to fit 1986, where suddenly Vanessa is essentially Ross' law clerk and not at every Lewis family moment.
    • Soaplovers
      BTG: June 2025 Discussion Thread

      By Soaplovers · Posted

      He needs to divorce her arse with her constant cheating.   She's no better than Doug... she's F*cking pathetic.
    • kalbir
      Guiding Light Discussion Thread

      By kalbir · Posted

      I didn't know of any interruptions for Maeve Kinkead after her 1997 return. Her runs would then be 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-2000, short arcs until the end. I knew Maureen Garrett second run was interrupted from a 2009 interview but I couldn't recall the exact year. Her runs would then be 1976-1980, 1988-2000, short arcs until the end.
    • DemetriKane
      BTG: June 2025 Discussion Thread

      By DemetriKane · Posted

      As I said in May, I have no problem with Martin and Bradley being married. You can still do all the fun introloper storylines with them as you do everyone else. Both men of a certain age, and it is very believable for them to have either a first love or have been previously married. And, you can do it without either of them cheating!  

      Please register in order to view this content

       I said something similar during the premiere week. Bill was the perfect age to play Martin as Vernon and Anita's child. I would've much preferred this version, but oh well.
    • P.J.
      Guiding Light Discussion Thread

      By P.J. · Posted

      I don't know how you want to count Maeve. She "retired" in '00, but would come back for appearances. I don't know however if she made an appearance in '01 or '03. In '02 I believe she came back for Josh and Reva's wedding. I assume she came back when Gina Tognoni took over the role of Dinah. And I know she was back for Ross' memorial service. Maureen Garrett was around until at least '00. I don't think Holly was in town when Ben returned though. I just got pissed off about Jerry all over again.
    • DeeVee
      Guiding Light Discussion Thread

      By DeeVee · Posted

      So, pretty sure Zaslow, Garrett, Kinkead, and Newman all chose to leave the first time. (If that's wrong, please correct me). Bernau - not sure why he left the first time. Was it voluntary? Or did they decide to write him out? They were writing so many out during that time period. It always seemed odd to me that they introduced Alex, FINALLY giving him someone he could talk to, and then he was written out. Or maybe that's why they made Alex his sister, so she could take his place as the head of the Spaulding family? Would love more intel on that if anyone knows. Simon - was he replaced by RVV? Or did he voluntarily leave the first time? It seems to me like one of those times TPTB decided to sex up or glamorize a character (and it clearly flopped). If he was fired, interesting he came back. Again, would love if someone could spill the tea. Clarke - I've always assumed he left because of his personal issues, but not sure if that was the case the first time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

  I accept