Jump to content

The NFL Thread


Soapsuds

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is disturbing on so many levels. Even more so because the NFL/ Ravens saw the tape in its entirety and they’re pretending they never saw it till yesterday. They were willing to give this man a slap on the wrist because they viewed him as a product to their multibillion dollar brand. Every photo of Rice and his wife taken together her head is bowed in a completely submissive role. People are using the fact that she married him as an excuse to absolve his behavior. Honestly, I don’t know what on earth compelled her to marry this man after he knocked her out cold and I’m not even going to try. Obviously this isn’t the first time he hit her. His nonchalant attitude as he dragged her out of the elevator is unbelievably scary. Not one ounce of remorse as she lay slouched on the floor. Even after she came to outside the elevator, he just stood there towering a few feet away as she limply got up on her own. The fact that they made her hold a joint press conference with Rice when the tape first got leaked and she took partial responsibility is jaw dropping. He’s a despicable human being and the NFL just as despicable. It took public outrage for them to terminate his contract. If not, this man - and many players just like him (Hardy) - would continue to be playing in the NFL while fans glorified them as heroes.

Say what you will about TMZ but after months of the NFL doing absolutely nothing they released it the first week of NFL kickoff for maximum effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well this is the same league and team that praises and erected a statue of a murderer outside their stadium.

While this incident is appalling, disturbing, and extremely sad for her in particular, sports in this country has ingrained into it a culture of turning a blind eye to this kind of behavior in the interest of the almighty dollar. At that's at every level, high school(remember Steubenville), college(Penn State), and professional. And it's much more engrained, accepted, and ignored than I think even we all realize. The NFL in particular has become IMO now just a league full of thugs. I would say the commissioner at a minimum needs to go, but he's elected by the owners who only care about money and under his leadership, the league has grown and become more profitable than ever and has surpassed Baseball as America's sport IMO. And frankly I doubt it would change anything.

This all coming on the cusp of the NCAA dropping Penn State's postseason ban and the school will again be able to offer it's full range of athletic scholarships come 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Perhaps she is with him because of the lifestyle she gets to maintain. She does not work, and yes, she married him after the heinous elevator incident. Does this absolve Rice? Absolutely not, but I won't be crying for her either. Now that he is unemployed, let's see how hard he is to leave.

I'm not being insensitive here because I grew up in a household where my father beat my mother weekly, and if we were lucky, several times a week. It was like clock work. Being a child and seeing your mother with swollen black eyes and watching your father twist her arm so far behind her back until she submits??? Yeah, been there done that. At the time, I was too young to ask the question "why did she stay". What I do know is that my father kept all 10 of us in nice clothes and we never wanted for much. One day, the police showed up and we watched them greet my father at the door to escort him in to get his things and leave. He was to never return and he didn't. My mother then had 10 mouths to feed with no job, skills or prospects. We had to go on welfare and many times we were hungry. For a time, we resented my mother for making our father leave. We didn't know any better.

Janay gets to wear red bottoms and carry purses that are in the 5 digits! She has many options, but when you get to live a certain lifestyle, you are more willing to put up with certain things. Marrying a man who put his fist thru your face? Oh well!

The NFL did nothing here but guarantee the money keeps rolling in. What did this do for domestic violence? Only showed rich abusers that they need to be more cautious of where they do their abusing.

What message do women take from this? Not one bit of progress has been made!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's sad.

Honestly there is nothing anyone can say that will make his behavior and even more so, the actions or lack of action on the part of the NFL in any way acceptable or excusable or remotely justified. The NFL has a history of looking away from the actions of those athletes who bring in the dollar. I for one am not ok with any organization or institution enabling this kind of behavior for money. And these are people that our children aspire and look up to? Yeah no thanks.

Nothing is going to change. Penn State's ban was removed let's all celebrate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's interesting because I had a discussion with my boss and I asked him why he thought she stayed with him after that attack. Without hesitation he said money. I thought he was oversimplifying the answer. Yes, money may be a factor but he portrayed women to be gold diggers -at the least the ones who stayed with rich men who repeatedly beat them and never left. To him, the days of the long suffering wife who is financially dependent on her husband as a means to survival were long over. I read an article in which the author said Ice Cube once told her relationship is like a transaction and sex is the payment. I have no doubt many of these rich, black athletes - and yes, I said Black - holds this view. If they don't like it they can leave since women are a dime a dozen. I'm not surprised Janay very swiftly and unequivocally defended her husband. Women abused by their husbands always do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think anyone is saying it shouldn't be about domestic violence. Yet there is a history of sports excusing the actions of a few for the almighty dollar. The NFL, the NCAA, and high school athletics have turned a blind eye to this kind of behavior in boys and men, setting a tone that it's "ok" to break the rules, therefore helping enable such behavior.

Plus these institutions actually have moral clauses that are in place that players and personnel are expected to follow. If someone can't adhere to those then they suffer the consequences, simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I felt the same way. I'm more outraged by the legal system for letting him off with a slap on the wrist.

That said, it's been apparent for years that the NFL is an organization of psychopaths. The concussions, the tax exempt status, the way they turn a blind eye to violence and crime, the Washington team name, the bullying, the homophobia, etc...there's nothing redeemable about this organization but that won't stop people from throwing money at them. Come game day, all the people clutching their pearls will be right there in the stands. Football fans (40 percent of whom are women) have proven time and time again that they don't care about anything but the game.

If she's really in this just for the money, the best thing she could do is bide her time, kill him and collect his estate and life insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The NCAA doled out the wrong punishment. Taking away scholarships and imposing bowl bans (or now, championship contention) doesn't address the culprits. Instead it punishes individuals who had nothing to do with either the crime or the cover-up. It's infortunate that the NCAA continues to punish the wrong people and no challenge is ever made to that. Punishing the players who are still on a team, for instance, because of infractions/violations by someone who "escaped" to the NFL is ridiculous.

Jerry Sandusky's Penn State enablers (all those who looked the other way) should be punished, not the players or the new coaching staff. Hiding behind the institution and making others pay for crimes they didn't commit is not proper punishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Domestic violence is another topic that society in general does not know how to resolve or properly address. Whenever society does not know how to deal with a particular issue, it's allowed to fester and periodically gets the spotlight when something the media finds noteworthy occurs.

I don't see the point of racializing this as it pertains to athletes. And I don't think generalizing the habits of rich black athletes does anything either. How does anyone know that "many" of them aren't about family values?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most of the people who were involved or known to be involved are gone.

I think the problem is not just one incident it's a culture that has been prevalent there and at the big universities for years. It's really not much different than the NFL, in that the interest in attracting the best players, going to the biggest bowl games is not about love for school or academics. It's all about money. Frankly I don't see what the issue is with barring them from bowl games, who exactly is that hurting.

How do you break or change that culture? It takes more than NCAA sanctions, but again this was a situation, you broke the rules and moral clauses the NCAA has in place, you pay the price. It's unfortunate that scholarships to students who really wanted to goto Penn State were withheld(and I am not talking about those who go to get the extra perks the sports programs give them or just go as a stepping stone to the NFL). But the NCAA is a joke similar to the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand that money is the main draw for some, but I don't want to assume that every college football player or basketball player is in it just for the money (in terms of pro potential). Some of them probably already know they won't go pro and just love the sport, comraderie, etc. Whose to say that the chance to compete in a bowl game might not be one of the highlights of their athletic lives? I wouldn't want to have worked for years to get on a college team with hopes of playing in a major bowl game, only to have that taken away because some administrator or coach violated rules, et al.

NCAA sanctions should be revised so that they fit the violation instead of the one size fits all approach. Just like the NFL, they do not have punishment that fit certain actions so they make it up as they go along. Look how a two-game suspension was made into a six-game suspension policy, and a video turned two-games into an indefinite suspension.

None of the discussions surrounding this seem to be about addressing the actual issue in terms of implementing any type of program for NFL players and their spouses/partners. Instead it's about getting rid of the commissioner, speculating about Ray Rice's football future, labeling his wife as a gold-digger, and on and on. Some of those issues need to be pursued but suggestions for changes should be somewhere in that discussion.

I may watch ESPN but I despise it with a passion at times like these. All these disingenuous people mechanically saying it's disgusting and acting as if they are morally above all of this. Why have people who are not knowledgeable about abuse sit there and spout off nonsense about such a serious topic? Some of them are guilty of the very things over which they sit there and judge others. I wish they had a show that only reported information and nothing else (no commentary, analysis, bloviating).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Last installment of 76 Felicia is horrified to arrive in Rosehill and discover that Charles has been in a coma since the night she left. She spends every moment at his bedside and, learning that a friend had a promise to God produce favorable results in a similar crisis, vows to give Eddie up forever in exchange for Charles’s recovery. Shortly after her prayer Felicia is told that Charles has rallied and has regained consciousness. Felicia now is determined to avoid Eddie and honor her promise. Bruce explains to Lynn that he must contact her parents or he and Van could be legally charged for allowing a minor child to live with them without parental consent. Bruce doubts Lynn’s assurance that her parents could care less, and is shocked when he discovers for himself that Lynn’s mother is as unfeeling as the girl has claimed. He informs a delighted Lynn that he plans to become her legal guardian.
    • I think that worked, but not as much by the late '80s, where I think they started getting things wrong with Mack.  I do respect Kevin Dobson, who did well when he was given the material he deserved (like the story with Jason).
    • 1976 Pt 2 The Organization has retained Michael Selby to represent their hit men. The district attorney recognizes his opponent as a noted courtroom specialist and knows he has his work cut out for him. Raising technicality after technicality, Selby quickly eliminates Lieutenant Price’s testimony implicating Bailey and Jerry’s testimony about Heather’s being assaulted. ‘Then, after cutting Julian’s testimony out as common knowledge, Selby goes straight to the heart of the  prosecution’s case. He demands that Carrie be produced now, sure that she’s been taken by the Organization. To Selby’s horror and shock, the doors open and Carrie walks in, and the courtroom explodes into pandemonium. As soon as the judge can restore order, Carrie is sworn in and begins her testimony. When court recesses for the day, Steve is confronted by another Organization man, Franklin, who questions him about why he took Carrie away. Steve tells him that Carrie was so frightened by the hit man lurking around that he saw his opportunity to be alone with her and “score.” Steve then adds that she wasn’t at all cooperative or friendly—she just cried all the  time—so he dumped her. He insists he has no idea how the police got her after that. Franklin accepts his story, and Steve learns that his next test is to testify to just what he’s told Franklin, omitting, of course, the reference to the hit man. Carrie insists upon a meeting with Steve and begs him not to go underground. He tells her he can’t back out now; you can’t go through life letting somebody  else do it all the time. Steve takes this opportunity to inform Lieutenant Price that he has to dump on Carrie on the witness stand for the Organization, but he can’t stop now. Julian, irate that Selby has blocked any reference to Nurse Fellowes’s disappearance and murder, as she was the only witness who could corroborate Carrie’s testimony, confronts Selby on this evasion. Selby | coldly tells Julian that there is no concrete connection between the nurses’ death and anything else that’s happened in this case and that to bring it into this trial would be a miscarriage of law. Julian, realizing  that it all falls on Carrie’s shoulders now, warns her that Selby will be out for blood; he has to make the court believe she’s lying.  The next day the district attorney introduces Carrie’s tape recorder. The tape, burned, as is the recorder, is barely audible. Selby calls for a mistrial, claiming that his clients’ reputations have been damaged enough. As the judge calls a recess: to consider the motion before the bench, the district attorney admits that he predicted everything Selby would do to this point, but had not guessed about this motion. If it works and there’s a new trial, Carrie is in far greater danger.  Steve now tells Castor that either he’s working for  the Organization as of now or he’s going to look elsewhere for a job. Castor offers the rainy weather as an excuse to wait before contacting “him,” because “the iron in him’Il be driving him crazy.” Realizing that this is a lead, Steve starts to write it down. When he is nearly caught, he warns himself that from now on  everything he learns will have to be kept in his head.  As soon as possible, he passes the “iron” clue along to Julian. The district attorney gains a respite when the judge  turns down the mistrial motion, but the tape has been disallowed also, ruled inadmissible. So it’s Selby’s turn to cross-examine Carrie. When he forces her to admit that she never actually saw the hit man, Selby turns to the jury and informs them that this proves she’s been lying. He then suggests this has all been a plot to boost the circulation of the newspaper she works for. Selby then goes to work on Carrie’s personal morals. Since she’s admitted that she and Steve spent three days in the apartment, alone together, he asks questions and makes insinuations designed to make the jury believe this was actually a sleazy affair. To Carrie’s horror, he then calls the landlady, Mrs. Wilson who testifies that that Steve and Carrie,registered as Mr. and Mrs. Clark, spent the three days in question drinking and partying with loud music and assorted other sounds coming from their rooms until late each night. Carrie rises to her feet and screams at Mrs. Wilson, ““You’re lying!” Steve is served with a subpena.  Joe Castor visits “the man”: Fred Harrington! Castor gives Harrington his report on Steve. He thinks Steve, with his computerlike mind, could be invaluable in helping the Organization work out money-exchange problems. Harrington tells Castor he wants the trial over as soon as possible, no matter how it goes. Those men are expendable; he has a bigger problem: Julian.
    • Given the weird fantasies/out of town barn trips she does for Reva/Kyle, I can't see it either. (Not to mention Kyle's obsessive talking to paintings, or Billy's nightmares.)
    • She would be great, but I of course am thinking of her in What's Love Got to Do with It.
    • Agreed that they had a home in the present tense of the first set of episodes.  But I was wondering if they lived in the mansion in the past when Sophia disappeared, and moved out when Santana got pregnant?  Or even when Danny was born.
    • According to the French Santa Barbara site the Andrades had a house in the early episodes.  I thought I remembered scenes in their home. The Andrade house
    • I always wondered if the Andrades lived at the Capwell Mansion?  Certainly they could've had a living room in their space or wherever they went on days off. But, I felt like it was never clear whether Santana visited Rosa when Kelly and Eden were young, or if she actually lived in the servant's quarters (one hopes modern developers have found a euphemism for that space).  I always imagined that Rosa, Santana, and Reuben lived with CC up until Channing was murdered, and then they found their own place because the kids were mostly over 18 (and Santana was pregnant). I like the idea of Rueban and CC being close until Santana got pregnant.  And then Reuben would've hated the adoption of Brandon.  Which would have meant he hated CC, and would've only continued to work for him to try to get info on whatever happened to his grandson. With regard Ava Lazar, having recently rewatched the pilot for the millionth time, I find her captivating to watch, but her line delivery is so dull. She looks amazing, and I just want her to be more quick witted.
    • I liked the original 4 family set up.  The families were all different from each other and were intertwined.  They should have been given equal airtime. I felt that Lockridges were perfectly cast with the exception of Laken.  She should have been quickly recast.   I liked all 4 of the actors cast as the Andrades and wish they would have been given better writing.  I really thought Ava Lazar (Santana) would have been one of the breakout stars if she had not been replaced. My only issue with the casting of the Perkins family was Robert Alan Browne as John and as much as I liked Mark Arnold he was the wrong actor to recast Joe Perkins. And of course it was ridiculous how badly they screwed up the casting of CC. The other Capwells were well cast.
    • This late 1976 stuff doesn't sound as bad as it has in other versions I've read (weekly recaps from Jon-Michael Reed and SOD synopses). I am surprised that there is a variation of Ian - Meg - Arlene - Tom playing out this late in the game, but it doesn't sound half bad. Ian's involvement with Beaver Ridge and how it impacts Rick and Cal's future also intrigued me  more than I expected. Even the Carrie - Betsy connection having Carrie watch Suzanne while Ben is visiting was a nice surprise. I feel like this all falls apart pretty quickly with the arrival of Mia Marriott, Michael Blake, and a slew of other half baked characters under Upton.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy