Jump to content

AMC - Friday - August 19, 2011


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I will be the first to admit that I wub.png Alexa Havins Babe, Eden Rigel's Bianca, Rebecca Budig's Greenlee, Sarah Michelle Geller's Kendell and so on and so forth. But I never white washed any of their actions or saw them for anything else then what they were and meant to be. I have watched other actresses come in and out of their roles and I still see the character for who they are no endlessly contorting them into a box that is without blame and without ridicule. Even with a few deviations from the way the actresses played them they still owned their actions. I could still see the character and saw more then just a face, body or actor. While I found the recasts to be less lively the character was still the character. Ultimately I could never excuse or go to bat for all that they did just because there was a capable thespian in the role or just because the actor in question was attractive. I usually find this isn't the case with certain interest groups. In fact I find it increasingly clear that the group in question gives passes for them continuously and they endlessly get made out to be the victim by literally any means possible. It's never the characters fault. It's the writing, or another character, another actor, the director, the media, etc. It's pure fan enabling because a certain actor is in the role. There is nothing else for this phenomenon to be called I find. Especially when all of this loyalty would likely disappear if another actor/actress took the role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

JR has made ant-gay remarks to Binks for years. JR also made Transphobic remarks to Zoe and left her to die then went home and trashed her some more with Adam/KWAK!

Derek was also shown to be a homophobe in that sl. Ryan made nasty remarks but said he was sorry.

KWAK was also homophobic during the babyswitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't get this homophobia stuff. We want soaps to represent diversity with more gays, african americans, hispanics, and such yet when the realities of some of what that represents is comes out and yes some of its ugly, all of a sudden its bad? Fact is there are people out there who are anti gay who are racist and sexist are soaps supposed to not deal with that aspect of diversity? That said, I still don't find JR homophobic just nasty and vulgar when he is the one dumped on. I think a mountain made out of a molehill to be honest. His reaction was expected knowing JR and realistic and not pretty. It doesn't make him anti gay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right now Dixie is the only one who comes close to doing anything loving with JR. As much as JR is being a total ass, no one is giving him any reason to be anything else. He just gets called names. You can do tough love without name calling and ultimate abandonment. At least Dixie(who is not perfect but that's ok) is projecting any love. Tad has some, but he will never get the fact that JR's last name is Chandler out of his mind. I think the writers want to completely destroy him. Hopefully at the very least they have a plan on pulling him up at some point-a starting over perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you. I file this under all homophobes are assholes but not all assholes are homophobes. JR is an ass hole who is using homophobic slurs because because its the easiest, most convenient weapon.

We could start a whole conversation about characters showing bias and how appropriate it is, but sadly I think the days when we could have that discussion on this board are long gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sorry but are you saying people don't have a right to be angry about homophobia? Are you saying we should take it easy on JR because he 'realistically' has these prejudices? huh.png In what world would this be acceptable? I get it yeah there are ass holes who make homophobic remarks that doesn't mean they shouldn't be reamed the hell out for it.

Except the words he uses, how he treats gay people, and his ideology about gays, lesbians and transgender persons does make him anti-gay. The actions that he takes are very anti-gay, the words that he says are anti-gay, his beliefs about how the world should work are anti-gay. I can't belabor this point enough, how is this prejudice about people who like the same sex not anti-gay? I really wish someone would explain this to me because I am at a complete loss. He says that women who are lesbians shouldn't raise children (twice), If I am not mistaken he urinated on a transgender person, refused a person help because they were transgender, and he consistently makes barbs about people who are gay. This isn't even bringing up the fact that he rubs elbows with judges who are also anti-gay.

JR says this stuff too often about too many gay people for this to just be a run of the mill slur that has no basis or meaning. Somewhere inside him he believes this stuff or else he wouldn't say it, much less so frequently. Like I said before why can't he insult Bianca about the way she dresses, looks, talks, acts, etc. Why does he always insult her for liking women? Why does JR view a woman loving another woman as a basis for derogation, shame and something to be openly mocked for? The answer is because he thinks gay people are beneath him (a person who is heterosexual).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is a soap opera. People can be bothered by it and outraged I suppose but this is not reallife so I guess while I can be disturbed by the characters behavior he is a fictional character not a real person.. And in reallife things like this do happen. I guess maybe the reaction is positive since its something getting a reaction which is what soaps want.

I also find both sides of the JR debate interesting. Those that seem to love him and blame all his actions on everyone except for him and those that put he in particular under a microscope and find faults that many other charactrers have exhibited without the same level of scrutiny. I guess he's considered a buzzworthy character which I guess is considered a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He also called Annie a crazed lunatic and bitch how many times and they were true love or so I have been told and has thrown Scotts incarceration into his face how many times also. Its called hitting someone where it hurts and where they are most vulerable and what would be the most hurtful to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So it's the entirety of Pine Valley who is at fault in light of the fact that JR can't act like a normal human being and get his act together?

He is the equivalent to the Todd and Sonny of AMC just without the reasonably sympathetic back story.

I always felt Marissa was a Babe insert. Though I think Marissa has more grounds then Babe did in JR hurting AJ.

And that's the entire problem. Marissa shouldn't have to get JR sober. He should want that for himself.

I firmly believe JR is a male chauvinist, so him calling Annie a bitch doesn't surprise me in the slightest. That's nothing new. He has been disrespectful and demeaning to every single female character he has interacted with even his own beloved mother who he has said he loved like no other and that was when Andrew Ridding was in the role. The homophobia is just another layer to an already reviled disgusting character. The main problem I have with him insulting Bianca is that he only attacks her for being gay and nothing else as if he thinks her being gay is something for her to be ashamed of because he believes her being gay is something for her to be demeaned and hated for. As if she is less of a person because she is a lesbian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which is totally different from her sister who came to town to scam money from him.

But in some ways she has hurt him worse than her sister ever did. I don't think she's unaware of that and even feels bad, but as a man being left by your wife for another woman has to be a boatload of hurt and just feeds his already low self esteem. His reaction I know people are lambasting him for but none of what he's doing or how he is reacting is out of character including him trying to buy the judge to get his kid only to have it blow up in his face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh SOnny Corinthos has no sympathetic backstory unless you are talking about the same Deke nonsense he blabbers off time and time again. Sonny Corinthos and Todd Manning also have the entire canvas practically licking their asses to justify their bad behaviors too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think all the suits are fit too tight, except for Jon Lindstrom's. DC lawyers/doctors are not all LA fashion elites. Yes, maybe Tomas would have a more modern cut to his suit, but an established guy like Bill wouldn't go around looking like that lonely button on his jacket was ready to explode constantly.
    • I do think there's room for optimism, especially with Amazon making enough new episodes to last until December. There's still time for the various players to get their ducks in a row. Guess we'll know soon enough! 
    • I do agree it's better to just have people pop back into town. I never understood why Roger needed a mask on an island, when neither Fletcher or Alex would've known who he was. And the vine...sigh. Couldn't he have just been sent crashing through a window or something?
    • When the announcement was first made, I did wonder if other plans were in the works. I guess we can always keep hoping, especially as the show has a small core cast.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy