Jump to content

Ratings from the 70's


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Nothing embodies that sentiment better, IMO, than the Marlena/Samantha story.  Not only is the premise of one twin stashing the other twin inside a sanitarium and then assuming their identity absurd*, but as several have pointed out, Deidre and Andrea Hall also neither look nor sound exactly alike.

Furthermore, what was Samantha's goal in taking over Marlena's life?  Because, all that I could gather from watching clips on YT was that Samantha was hooked on drugs, that Marlena found out that she had used Marlena's name to obtain more drugs and that Samantha warned Marlena to back off.

I realize that PFS has her detractors and that she probably was a pistol to work with BTS, but I think her writing possessed more intelligence than people give her credit for.  Even in the '80's, when she was spinning action-adventure stories for GH and, occasionally, for DAYS, PFS's stuff still was a cut above anything that Anne Howard Bailey or others wrote in that particular style.  Her tenure at RH might have been the most problematic for her and for viewers, but on the other hand, I think there were problems with that show that existed before she joined.

 

(*Although, I am certain someone out there will prove to me by way of real-life incidents that it is more common than I would think, lol).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

CBS approached Bill Bell in 1977 about creating a second show for the daytime lineup but as well all know Bill Bell wouldn't have a second show ready until 10 years later. The only soap schedule change CBS made in 1977 was expanding Guiding Light to 1 hr. If Bill Bell had a second show ready in 1977, would Guiding Light expansion have been delayed or would Love of Life have ended?

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Woah!  What happened on DAYS the week of 5/30-6/3 for them to jump all the way back to #2?

I would say the latter.  Bridget and Jerome Dobson seemed to have revitalized GL by that point, so I could imagine CBS/P&G being very eager to expand the show to sixty minutes.  LOL, on the other hand, might not have been at the very bottom of the ratings, but they do seem to be stuck in the bottom half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely!  As a matter of fact, @kalbir, depending upon whom you ask, many GL fans consider the Dobsons' era to be superior to the other two!

Huh.  Interesting, lol.

ATWT back then was like Y&R today: it didn't really matter to longtime fans whether there was anything exciting going on at that moment.  They still tuned in, because the characters had become familiar and comforting to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Two storylines from the Dobson era that impacted GL until the end were Roger/Holly and intro of the Spauldings. Its too bad so little of the Dobson era has surfaced. I haven't seen any 1976 episodes and AFAIK only two 1977 episodes and a partial 1978 episode have surfaced. 1979 and 1980 have a few episodes out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, @kalbir.  I have read so much about how the Dobsons "modernized" GL.  Compared to the 1960's stuff that still is out there, the Dobsons' work - that is, what I have seen of it - feels so fresh and contemporary.  I wish there was more of it available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 6/6/77-6/10/77 & 6/13/77-6/17/77:

Please register in order to view this content

FAST WEEKLY WEEK OF 6/20/77-6/24/77 NOT AVAILABLE

(Note: Per newspaper listings, there were no scheduled preemptions and all daytime shows were scheduled to air every day this week).

Edited by JAS0N47
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could never have worked in any network's daytime division, especially during the '70's.  Each soap's ratings seemed to fluctuate wildly from week to work.  One week, you're nipping at ATWT's heels; the next, you're in the middle of the pack.  ATWT staying at no. 1 appears to have been the only constant - and even that was not guaranteed!

It's just enough to drive even Grant Tinker (RIP) to the edge.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • -- I agree that the vibes are there, but I can also make the case that it's a pale imitation. That Neil Winters Lounge is already a pretty classy place, but the decor make it look tackier. Those Happy Birthday signs are tragic in design and color. The tablecloths look like they've been chosen by Helen Keller. Where is Claire? We hear stupid reasons for her lateness, but we all know it's because this show is too cheap to pay for too many actors in any one episode. It makes NO sense that Victoria has that toast to Nikki without Claire's presence. And where is Cole? Off coughing somewhere? -- The rest of the show was watching people open their black invitations from Alexander Dumas -- for a party on June 13...TWO WEEKS AWAY. So we got through the entire sweeps and still no Dumas? The big sweeps reveal is a party in France in 2 weeks??? Why anyone thinks this is good soap is beyond me.  
    • Chandler Massey smirked in EVERY scene in which he appeared. He's not a good actor. He cannot get into character, ever, and plays every scene like he's Chandler running into an old friend on the street. I hate it because actors should take their work seriously and respect it and everyone around them.   It's all so real, to the point where there's no sense trying to separate Drake from his character. I snarked a lot over the years about Drake Hogestyn's acting -- very arch, lots of tics, over-the-top at times -- but I also think he was a great soap star. There was so much humanity in everything he did, and he was always a comforting and stabilizing force on screen. Flashbacks on soaps are almost always special and fun, but does anyone come across as more loving and filled with humanity than John? I don't think so. DAYS has suffered a lot of loss in the past few years. For me, this one hits the hardest.
    • “I’m not a lifelong soap fan, but I sure am now,” Wolf tells PEOPLE about creating the documentary Soaps, which includes deep dives into the biggest and most successful soap operas in the industry, with a strong focus on The Bold and the Beautiful. “It reflects, in a broader way, the cultural significance of soap operas and the incredible task involved in bringing these stories to the screen every day.”
    • I have this for the 4th act on 11/9/88, which per my files, is the first time John and Stefano are in a scene together: Limo (Roman, Diana, Stefano, Milo) Then their second time together is 11/17/88 in the second-to-last act: ON LOCATION: Beach & Cliff (Diana, Roman, Stefano) I'd have to check the 2016 logs, so I don't know who shares scenes as easily in this year, but these are the last 4 episodes that John and Stefano were both in together: 1/8/16, 1/11/16, 3/1/16, 3/2/16.
    • I'm going to respond to you about this show. I've been accused of hating on it for some reason or another. But as a 53-year-old black man I do not hate this show at all. It heavily represents people like me, but I want it to be treated well and not just pushed with half-assedness, which is what I feel has happened on several occasions so far. Bad editing, bad cliffhangers, or no cliffhangers at all, disappearing characters with dropped storylines, etc. I can understand shows no longer wanting certain characters or  storylines, but why the "Judy Winslow" effect? I'm really finding it weird that Jacob doesn't mention his father or his detective partner. Jacob was smack dab in the middle of them both.
    • I love many things about BTG very much. For me, it's greatest strength is how the family relationships are so beautifully written. The deep love between family members while acknowledging each other's flaws--it's SO GOOD.  The best of the best is the two sister relationships: loving but very different sisters Dani and Nicole and adversarial sisters Kat and Eva. These two relationships can anchor the show for many years to come, in my opinion. (The one caveat is that the young and very talented Colby and Ambyr may want to leave the show sooner rather than later, but that's to be expected). My biggest problem with this show is this: Where are the romantic love stories? Where are the star-crossed lovers? Almost every character on this show is married, or in a committed relationship, or just fooling around. Right now the only potential for this are in the Ashley/Andre/Derek and Kat/Tomas/Eva situations. Like a lot of people, I feel the sooner they ditch Ashley and Derek, the better. I hate picking on actors, but the characters are so blah and bland it's like they're a parody of soap characters. I like Andre, and there's some indication they might have him become more serious about Dani, but I don't see that becoming a big love story. I could be wrong. Kat and Eva fighting over a man would be amazing. Over Tomas? No.  I've noticed on social media some people are starting to ship Kat and Jacob. I think that shows how much viewers long for a messy love story. There is much I enjoy about BTG and I have no intention of bailing on it. But over all my many years of watching soap operas, the thing that always got me the most excited about them was the question: "When are those two finally going to get together?"
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 11/26/73-11/30/73 & 12/3/73-12/7/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy