Jump to content

FX: American Horror Story


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 340
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree with that. I rewatched the pilot because a friend wanted to see it--it probably helped that we were drinking while watching, but for what it is I liked it a lot more. Though if they do change families every season as has been said, we did both decide that the outcome that everybody int he family dies--or that they are already dead, would be majorly lame endings (and not beneath Ryan Murphy and crew by any means).

I tend to like characters (in books and tv/movies) that others say are unlikeable, but in the pilot I actually found the whole family kinda likeable--yes, even Dylan's character. Again, being a Ryan Murphy show, I have little doubt this will change, but...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The second episode seemed better although it seems they are taking the black comedy/parody route instead of being genuinely horror. I found myself laughing at the ironic non-nonsensical moments of the show--Constance and her lover played by Michael Graziadei, the Manson worshiper who had fantasies of being cut in half and then literally got cut in half by Tate with the axe.

Good show, and at least Dylan McDermott wasn't it in much it was thanks to the rest of the cast to pull the episode off. The cupcake scene was rather puzzling though, as if Constance either intended to poison someone or knew in advance to save Viv and Violet from the attackers.

We'll see what next week brings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoyed it, but I think you're giving Ryan Murphy too much credit--from every interview, he thinks this is genuinely, non campy, full balls to the wall-on horror, the likes "TV has never seen before". I admit, I enjoy it. Some of the campier moments were right out of later seasons of Nip/Tuck but on that show they pretended it was a drama dealing with real issues, here there isn't that pretence at least.

I believe Constance really does want to poison violet (I was sure the dog would eat it--glad he didn't). It seems like her, Tate and the maid are all connected (tate saying how they needed ot get rid of the bodies since Constance wanted him to continue his therapy there, etc)--but honestly I'm not really expecting much plot coherence here. Constance looked genuinely upset when she saw Viv and Violet running away--noticed that Violet was there. Maybe if Vilet had died she could join them (are they dead?) I dunno, I'm not gonna think about it anymore. Apparently Graziadei is in several episodes though--I wonder if it's just to say a line and be shirtless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the 1968 murder prologue, they were watching Peyton Place. But they showed the episode, and we heard it--and since we were told that was 1968 they failed. I believe the show was colour by 1968--but at any rate the episode is early--it's in the first 30 episodes so would have been 1966...

Not that it matters especially on this show but :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL I was going to say the same thing. It was from 1964, one of the first 20 episodes. It was fun!

As for the episode, I really don't know what to say. It's not coherent, it doesn't make much sense, it seems like it's all thrown together... but it's entertaining. I'll keep watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why is everyone doggin Dylan McDermott? I like his character, and I always enjoyed the actor on The Practice, as well as Steele Magnolias and Miracle on 34th Street :P I think his moody edge fits the show perfectly. Plus, he's looking better than he ever has, especially from the neck down! Nice ass ;)

I'm liking this show. It's not my usual cup of tea, but it's like watching a continuing horror movie. These days, I'm digging short-lived / season-long series, so if their story arc concludes in one season, I'm all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree--everyone keeps saying how horrible DMD is but I don't really see it. OK, he's not some miracle of acting but he fits perfectly. And loving the package :P

I really enjoyed episode 3. I think this is finding its footing. But GOD is it campy or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think he's a great actor--but I admit he's doing a good job with the character given (my complaints were more about the type of actor he seemed to become). Though I'm disappointed they seem to have cut down on his nudity from the pilot--talk about tease.

Episode 3 was good in that it started answering some questions--but it does seem to be getting more over the top campy--I don't scare all that easy but I found parts in the past episodes genuinely creepy (if incoherent and over the top), but this one didn't really scare me at all. Granted I watched the earlier two with a friend, in the middle of the night, while *ahem* slightly intoxicated, and watched this one sober in the daytime, but... (Oh and when Sal Mineo was killed he was hardly young like that weird ghost scene tongue.png )

I admit I find the show a mess in many ways, but it doesn't bother me the way it has on past Ryan Murphy shows because I guess I feel that's part of the point (I'm sure he'd disagree...) Interesting Tim Minear is consulting producer--and Marti Noxon just joiend Glee as consulting producer--he seems to be trying to hire people from the Joss Whedon camp.

YRBB I'm ashamed that I got the year of the peyton Place wrong LOL, but am glad someone else caught it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think this disjointed nature of the show is by design. It has to be. It feels like we (the viewer) are coming into consciousness at times and then fading out other times. As if we are there for parts of the story and then purposely shut out during the intervening time. That can't be by accident, it's too jarring for that. Now whether it works or not is an open question. I think it suits the genre, but I can't claim to love this show. I'm still watching, that's the most I can say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
    • It's pilots like "Hurricane Sam" and "Anything for Love" that makes me so afraid to write professionally, because, my God, what if I actually tried and came up with something just as awful, if not worse (if that's even possible)?
    • JANUARY 1974 SPECIALS ADDED... Here are the January 1974 specials which have been added to the yearly list on page 76:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Wow, you have the patience of a saint watching through this period. I think the show does get better but it takes a while.  I won't give any spoilers about Zachary, but I will drop a slight hint: GL was probably trying to get a ratings boost by doing a story inspired by one of CBS's few primetime hits in the mid-1990s. And no, Zachary does not turn out to be a Texas ranger. 
    • Love makes everything possible.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy