Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think that's pretty obvious to most of us, but then Prospect Park and ABC in their press release assured fans that nothing would change, like it's all been worked out when obviously it hasn't. So the companies may make assurances that the transfer will be smooth, but the reality, as related in the above article, will not be anywhere near smooth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's becoming very obvious that this deal isn't as good as it was made to sound in the press release. But then again, press releases are all about spin by definition. Notice how the press release mentioned the same format and quality, but nothing about whether it owuld be 5 days a week 52 weeks a year. I took what they wrote to mean that they will still be hour long shows, but nothing about how often.

Also, I just can't see a startup internet network having the dough to take on 250 episodes a year and pay ABC a fee. It just doesn't add up financially. A huge network like ABC cancelled these shows because they became too expensive and they could replace them with cheaper shows. I can't imagine that these shows would even get 1/2 of the viewers on the internet that they get now, and most likely even less, so Prospect Park is gonna shell out $50 mil a year plus licensing fees to get just a portion of the audience that these shows get now? Not likely. It all just doesn't add up financially. Be afraid, be very afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some report mentioned that PP was going to pay ABC millions per year in license fees; perhaps it was the WSJ article that said that. Personally, I think that's putting them in a deep financial hole from the get-go, but have any official sources actually said PP is paying ABC millions per year in licensing fees?

And yes EastMA2, press releases are all about spin. Whatever it said in the press release, consider it just spin, because it's obvious they don't have everything worked out yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^Oh I don't know. There's a part of me who thinks this was the plan all along, and that ABC "cancelled" the shows just to give them a good reason, and look like the good guys for bringing them back to life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whatever happens, whether it's a horrible mess, the thought of throwing most of the rules out is exhilarating. Imagine remodeling OLTL around people it actually deserves to be modeled around, young and old - for me, as outlined in the other thread, people like Viki, Dorian, Natalie, Rachel Gannon and the Halls, a gay couple, some Woleks, a decent Joey, maybe Shane, Jamie Vega and a better Jack in the teen set - whoever. Characters or families or actors who have proven they either can take the weight or have real untapped potential. And then make up the rest as you go. New families, more Asian-Americans, more Indian-American/Hindu characters, a whole new canvas, in many ways. I think so much could be done, I just never imagined the opportunity could come so soon. I'm still not totally buying into it; it seems too good to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Errol's article said that PP got a grant from the government to be able to pay for these shows, as the governemnt were giving out grants for companies looking to invest in New Media. Why would they purposely take on shows that they know they can't afford? The people in charge of PP aren't amateurs so I am going to wait and see. God some of you are so negative, you spend months saying you want the shows saved and they are and you still have a problem. If it fails, at least SOMEBODY tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see why people are nervous, or aren't thrilled with this news, but I think it's obvious that a press release will exaggerate, and that this won't be what we are necessarily expecting. I'm mostly just hoping to see how these changes unfold, more than anything. I know there's a good chance none of the vets will be involved and this might end up being glassy-eyed 19 year olds staggering through Motel 6 bathrooms. But I still want to see how it works and see if this might be the start to something that will revive the genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's fair to say the press release is spin. I think this news leaked way earlier than either PP or ABC wanted and the release is just something they put out because they had to.

Everybody has their shopping list of what they want these shows to be and they're asking a million questions but there's nothing to tell and there probably won't be anything to tell for a long time. It's not like these things are going to launch right after the shows end on ABC so we probably have a nice, long, detail-free wait ahead of us. It's going to suck for the actors because the ones who - rightly - move on are going to get a big glass of haterade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think OLTL has a better shot of continuing close to after it ends on ABC, they have the next few months to figure that one out, but AMC is more urgent considering it wraps production a lot sooner and the cast is already released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marceline, this is so true. I bet a lot of the actors wish that this news never happened. Honestly, I feel sorry for those such actors, because they are going to receive the wrath of crazed soap fans if they decline to be involved with this project. In particular, Lucci and Slezak are put in such terrible positions, because if they choose not to be involved, then many will blame them when this venture fails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They've both been in the business for most of their lives and they've probably had to deal with all kinds of crazed soap fans. I also think Lucci may get something of a break - or I hope she will anyway - because fans know how ABC screwed her over regarding having her go out and say the show wasn't being cancelled. Lucci and Slezak have both been such team players, I'm really hoping that no one will blame them for anything they do.

There will always be crazy people who take this stuff too personally, but I think a lot of the actors will be happy to have both options, especially since there may be a very flexible filming schedule with this new show, and if the show is smart, they will let the actors do other projects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJnOpDWJX7b/ 1996 Daytime Emmys GH Best Show, their 4th win, Wendy Riche EP accepting she calls out 3 lost to death - Lee Mathis, Rosalind Cash & John Beradino. She concludes with Claire Labine's words, delivered by Mary Mae to Stone who was near death. It's famous now, "Every moment of my life, whether filled with joy or with pain has potential for grace realized. ... These are gifts from god. ..."
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • If I'm being 

      Please register in order to view this content

       about it I think Jan is a fine supporting part for a solid daytime vet (probably someone from the P&G soaps), as opposed to someone from the production location who is clearly cheaper. Which seems to govern some casting. I get the rationale, but I would start going through the ATWT/GL, etc. rolodex myself.
    • I dont mind Jan. She's good in the minor capacity she is used. 
    • tbqh I don't care about Jan, I don't care about Ashley and I think Jon Lindstrom as Joey is an acquired taste. Jon is a great actor but certain things are in his zone and then some are not. Some days I find Joey credible and compelling, but the stuff with him hanging around the Golden Corral, grumbling about Doug and bitching at Randy is not amazing. If he had material on par with what MVJ wrote for Ryan/Kevin on GH back in the day it'd be a different story. I do think he has real chemistry with Vanessa, which is in large part due to MVJ clearly molding that character (and hiring an appropriate actor) in the Lucy Coe vein when she reinvented Lucy in the '90s as well. But I am not here to spend 6+ months watching Jon glower a lot (which is what he's doing half the time to carry weak story) and make more vague dire pronouncements while Jen Jacob gets flustered and weepy over "Daddy" or whatever would come of that storyline. Putting them together sounds like a recipe for doom to me. But I may be in the minority on that.
    • I know this will never happen. But... Halle Berry as Dani Dupree(BTG). She would rock this role, it's in her wheelhouse.
    • When I see how bad the Ashley/Derek scenes are, I know there must be a larger purpose and Joey being her father is the thing that makes the most sense.  My take on it is that Ashley knows Joey is her father but doesn't know Joey. Maybe he was there when she was a child or just not around at all but I believe Jan when she says she didn't lie to her daughter about who her father was. Maybe she left him when she discovered his dangerous lifestyle.  I do think they could really jump start the character of Ashley if they hurry and do this. Jan is a great character and her scenes with Ashley have been helpful. This would further integrate Ashley into the canvas and give her something dramatic to do. With her working at the hospital along with Doug, it could lead to complications if she learns Doug is involved with her father. I just need is sooner rather than later because Derek is tanking her character. I need a distraction.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The stories are awful. I'm not enjoying any of them. All I'm left with is Sally in a plastic dress.
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy