Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You're exactly right, Vee, about the fact that "we don't know [for certain] what PP is doing or how they're doing it." This whole thread is just speculation based upon rumors others have stated/posted. And, given that this thread is all speculation, it is illogical for one to "remain quite optimistic about the venture based on what [one has] heard," while telling others that they shouldn't criticize or be pessimistic based upon what they have heard.

And based upon what I have read or heard (at SON or elsewhere), the following things give me reason to be very pessimistic about the PP venture:

1. Not one single rumor that PP is considering contracting AMC or OLTL back to 30 minutes. (Of course, I haven't read this whole thread; so if somebody can show me where PP has considered this, I'll gladly eat crow.)

2. Rumors that PP is giving serious thought about having both soaps follow the 13-week "arc" model (which proved to be a disaster on Port Charles).

3. Speculation--as well as just plain common sense--that both soaps will have a much smaller budget under PP than currently under ABC. And based upon what has occurred in the past, a lower budget has meant more outdoor park scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

+1, Marceline

Even though I have criticized you in the past, you are one of my very favorite posters here because you have the courage to say unpopular things even though others may attack you for doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Every fandom has crazy fans. At this point soaps are too irrelevant for anyone to give soap fans a bad name.

It's a shame anyone would take the cancellation of these shows out on the people who do The Chew or the other thing. I'm glad I never go on Facebook, I only ever hear bad things about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you. That's very kind. It appears that as long as you and I stay away from politics (far, far, FAR away LOL!) we can have a pretty nice conversation. I have to admit that I've grown to respect you too. (But still the politics...OY! wink.png )

What's particularly disturbing about the behavior of the people going after Symon and these other people is that most of the people attached to these replacement shows know nothing about soaps. So what is their first exposure to soap fans? Some SOS person who spams every post on Michael Symon's page with ten lines of "SOS SOS SOS SOS SOS..." or "Death to the SPEW!!!!!!!" and then proceeds to private message everybody on his page with hateful comments about how "their" show will be dead in three months.

Tell me, who deserves an eye roll more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why does it matter if it is 30 minutes?

Port Charles was always at the bottom so how was the 13 weeks arc thing a failure?

You don't know how much money PP has to spend. I doubt they would have took on these two AND their crazy ass fans if they didn't think they could keep the shows somewhat similar to what they were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Do we know for certain that AMC and/or OLTL will adopt a telenovela-like format when they move online? Has this been confirmed by PP? If that is where they are going, I say, give it a chance. Anything beats no AMC or no OLTL at all. (Well, almost anything; they really need to do something about the quality of acting and writing on both shows.) After all, if they try it and viewers don't respond well to it, they might be tempted to revert to a more traditional storytelling model. I'm willing to try anything as long as it is done well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again, this is something you wouldn't know unless you were a fan of Symon's but he went out of his way to placate the SOS psychos on his page. When they attacked him, he didn't block them the way a lot of people, myself included, suggested. He engaged them. He talked to them. He let them post their craziness. He was respectful and understanding. He made a point of showing appreciation for the soaps but admitted that he just wanted to do the best job on "The Chew" that he could. It was only after repeated attacks that he finally gave up trying to treat the soap fans like thinking human beings.

He's not encouraging the crazy. The crazy is already there and has been there for months acting like stone cold assholes. He took the high road and all that happened was that he and his supporters got terrorized. I'm glad he's calling them out. Not only are those people bad for him, they're bad for soaps.

Regardless of how anyone feels about soaps or the new shows, the [!@#$%^&*] that's been going down on Symon's page for the last few months has been completely, 100% out of line and utterly inexcusable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently Susan Lucci taped her last episode last Friday.

So strange to think that she won't be there for the final day of filming.

ETA: Never mind. Apparently she is still taping this week, although she may have taped her scenes for the last episode (out of order) on Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I stated before, the 30 minute length would hopefully allow both shows to get back to basics. (Although I concede that there is no guarantee of that.) Furthermore, 30 minutes would require much less of a time investment on the part of viewers. (Others have pointed out that 13-week arcs would do the same thing. However, the 30 mintue length--unlike 13-week arcs--would still keep both shows traditional in nature.)

Plain common sense states that a start-up venture like PP (even with government assistance) will not have the same type of money that ABC has to spend on these shows.

And, there is most certainly a good business reason for PP to take on AMC, OLTL, and their "crazy ass fans" (your words, not mine), even if this venture turns out to be a failure: by adding these two long-running programs to their internet channel, PP will get far more viewers and name recognition than they ever would have if they started two brand-new soaps (which, IMO, really would be in the best interests of the genre). It is perfectly reasonable to assume that after a year or two, PP (after having gotten their name out and increased website traffic) will drop both shows (in the ultimate act of betrayl towards Nixon soap fans) because they aren't bringing in an adequate amount of profit. With all due respect, the fact that you fail to see such a scenario possibly occurring (and instead assume that PP's motives are purely benevolent) is absolutely mind-boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I caught most of the episodes during that time period.   Subsequently Bell or Alden (I forget which) revealed that Peggy's rape story was done for strategic ratings purposes.  Chris's rape had occurred earlier, before the show really caught on & was near the middle or the lower end of the ratings.  Bell had been pleased with the concept and wanted the rape story to play-out for a much larger audience.  By the 1975-1976 season, the show was near the top of the ratings and was extremely popular among high school & college kids.  He felt the time was right to re-tell the story.   When I was watching in 1976, I didn't find it especially "cruel" that lightning had struck twice in the Brooks family.  I felt it was more of a continuation of Chris's storyline, giving her a chance to continue dealing with the trauma of her own rape.  
    • Dan being de facto HW explains a lot. It's clear the show changed direction on a dime according to his interests or whims.
    • Really enjoyed today's episode the whole way through. Having Drew and Nina as red carpet hosts was a brilliant move. You could really see Cameron Mathison channeling his own experiences as a TV host for shows like Entertainment Tonight, but putting a more sinister spin on the host's glib patter. And Cynthia Watros gave some amazing reaction shots during Drew's interactions with people like Carly, Joss, and Willow.  I also really liked the Alexis/Kristina scenes. I know a lot of us find Kristina exasperating, and she is, but Kate Mansi and Nancy Lee Grahn do a great job of portraying a very real dysfunctional mother/daughter dynamic. 
    • The episode she got killed off in - which made Wendy a prime suspect in her murder (her car was spotted outside the house) and then Wendy mysteriously disappeared from town. 
    • Norm!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • What Dan Curtis never seemed to understand -- and what Art Wallace knew from the get-go -- is that a slow, suspenseful build-up creates a far more satisfying episode than the constant "cliffhangers" that never amounted to much.  ("I'm going to kiillll you, Julia!" before every commercial break, lol.)  
    • George Wendt has died at 76   https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/george-wendt-dead-cheers-norm-1236222950/
    • Watch and form your own point of view; even in its flaws, this soap is soaping.
    • The show is excellent in my opinion.  There are a couple of less-than-stellar actors and a couple of bad storylines, but otherwise it's awesome and I watch many of the episodes twice.  However, episode #55 from May 19 was really bad, which is where you popped into the thread, but it was the *first* really bad episode.  So 54 great episodes out of a total of 55 episodes is pretty good, in my opinion!  I haven't seen today (#56) yet, but I hear it's good.  Will watch in a couple of hours.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy