Members Efulton Posted 3 hours ago Members Share Posted 3 hours ago (edited) I finished reading whatever you want to call that thing McTavish wrote. Even if everything she said was true every word she wrote was dripping in bitterness and nastiness. It proved to me that everything said and speculated about her was true. But damn I really enjoyed all the tea and shade. Edited 3 hours ago by Efulton 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Maxim Posted 3 hours ago Members Share Posted 3 hours ago One thing I want to say... Even if all of this happened and Megan was telling 10000 percent of the truth... Girl... the way she is telling it Please register in order to view this content ... with the toxic personal life remarks, backhanded compliments and fixation on people's bodies, plastic surgery and etc... while she is trying to "roast" the entire industry... she is unintendedly revealing too much about herself. There is a way to tell a story like this, without being so trashy and cheap. It reads like the most vile yellow tabloid. Really. I am not saying I didn't enjoy it (like a girl enjoys McDonalds from time to time)... but in the end I was left feeling like I overate with something nasty and fried and I can't turn back time... She wanted to appear snappy and witty, but in the end... you end up feeling even more sympathy for the people she worked with - Agnes, Susan etc. But... I wish someone crazy finds this and pitches it for a short-series. This is the type of mess that I want to see re-enacted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted 2 hours ago Members Share Posted 2 hours ago This is bad (particularly poor frumpy Liza being treated like the ugly one), as was virtually everything about the brief Rayfield/Cascio Frons' vision on steroids era that preceded Megan's return - I had never seen the show more unrecognizable and bizarre to me, and never would. But I will raise you and give you this video (timestamped), which features the unbelievably annoying original song I had almost convinced myself I'd imagined for the last 22 years until now. "Fuuuusionnnn! What women want!!" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jonathan Posted 2 hours ago Members Share Posted 2 hours ago I completely agree with everything said. In her memoir, Megan McTavish presents herself as the smartest person in the room, and also comes across as overly bitter. Her tone suggests a "it wasn't me, it was them" attitude, deflecting responsibility for any shortcomings. Furthermore, she uses her writing as a tool for vindictiveness, particularly targeting James Kiberd and Cady McClain—regardless of what they may or may not have done. This approach undermines McTavish's credibility and makes the memoir feel more like a personal vendetta than an honest reflection. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Franko Posted 2 hours ago Members Share Posted 2 hours ago Seeing those Fusion clips just makes me want to throw several buckets of dirty mop water. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted 2 hours ago Members Share Posted 2 hours ago When I think about her writing, here & also at GL, I think: problems with boundaries, with knowing what is too much or pushing too far, questionable judgment as to good taste & many times she is just mean-spirited, right? To me all of that also shows up in her memoir. So what she wrote about fictional characters informs what she writes about herself & others from her POV. And vice versa. I mean, it all fits. Whether every word is both true & accurate? Who knows? And, do I really care? Why would I? I do not have a high opinion of her as a writer. Didn't before & still do not. There's no need for me to be concerned about my opinion of her as a person. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alwaysAMC Posted 1 hour ago Members Share Posted 1 hour ago This bolded part - what storylines were going on during their short era/what years were these? I watched during that time, but can't recall which ones they did that were so ridiculous. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jonathan Posted 1 hour ago Members Share Posted 1 hour ago I just can't. What were the powers that be thinking with Fusion? "We need to be more like Sex and the City! We need to be more like Lipstick Jungle!" Why couldn't they just relax and let the show be itself? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted 1 hour ago Members Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) They brought on Alexandra Daddario as J.R.'s insta-girlfriend Laurie, as well as Seyfried as Joni who fared a bit better. (Daddario could not act back then.) But both came out of nowhere and had a series of Saved by the Bell-style teen plots with the terrible off-brand J.R. recast of the time (I think it was poor Andrew Ridings, who was wooden in the role) and whoever played Jamie - I can't remember, there was a rotating series. There were a few weird episodes devoted to these new insta-teens and maybe Brooke, Adam and Liza? sitting around a movie theater, which I found very strange (and again, straight out of an actual SBTB episode IIRC). There was the very hard, sudden Fusion push lumping all the women under 50 together in one office/job, and the massive push beyond Frons' new chosen leading men with each female lead - the remarkably terrible Carlos for Greenlee, the early, vaguely effeminate and very weird Michael Cambias for Kendall who came off too old for her, Boyd(!), etc. Like Fusion, the new men came out of nowhere and were promoted at this time as a singular unit in advertising - 'these are our new leads'. The truly unfortunate Henry Chin thing others have mentioned was, I think, around this time and he was among the above males, which was too bad bc I liked Henry. (Did no one consider the optics of naming a AAPI family 'the Chins' and having them run a Chinese restaurant?) The endless intrigues of Cambias, Lena, etc. began to take over the show out of nowhere. There's more craziness but that's what I can remember offhand. The very sudden, very forceful stuff with Fusion, the teens, etc. felt so foreign to the show for me. It did not feel like I was watching All My Children. I remember being surprised any time I'd actually see Erica, Tad, Adam, etc. Like 'what are you doing here?' Both the videos above are from this period IIRC. It was very late 2002 to maybe summer '03. Edited 1 hour ago by Vee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Liberty City Posted 1 hour ago Members Share Posted 1 hour ago It'd either be Micah Alberti or Justin Bruening around this time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted 1 hour ago Members Share Posted 1 hour ago It was Alberti, and he was not great. Bruening came later. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Liberty City Posted 1 hour ago Members Share Posted 1 hour ago Alberti & Andrew Ridings came in as quick as they went out, and then Bruening & Jacob Young really stepped right in and fixed the roles up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alwaysAMC Posted 31 minutes ago Members Share Posted 31 minutes ago Ohhh - wow, you're right - if all that happened together, then it was horrible. I remember each of those names and storylines, but didn't remember they all happened at the same time. That truly was a weird period of AMC. Thanks for all the details there! Please register in order to view this content 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.