April 5, 201114 yr Member Sure there have been pay cuts and budget cuts and all that, but I'm guessing RH, who they once offered the moon, still doesn't come cheap. We better not lose anyone of importance for him. Specifically two of my favorites, RS and EA, in light of recent story revelations and bts comments made. To be fair to Roger, they have been phasing Dorian and Matthew out for quite a while and probably would no matter what. My guess is Matthew and Brody are going no matter what. The main priority is keeping Todd, his harem, Ford, John, their harems, Rex, and that's probably about it.
April 5, 201114 yr Member I was wondering if they brought RH back for what could be the end. I always thought it seemed obvious RC didn't give two craps about Todd while TSJ was in the role. I swear I read something that RC and FV both wanted RH back RH back as Todd undoes the idiotic rapemance No it doesnt. Marty was still kidnapped and raped while being romanced by her victimizer. And IDA with it being obicious didnt care for TSJ as Todd. One certainly couldnt tell by all the focus and push to keep him as a leading man.
April 5, 201114 yr Member True but at least it wouldn't have been Todd re-raping her, not saying it's any better, just undoes something that shouldn't have happened with Todd's character
April 5, 201114 yr Member How is RH going to be playing a new character, when we've seen photos of RH's Todd, while Trevor was playing Todd? Will the writers think we're that stupid to forget the fact that they've shown a young Howarth as Todd in a photo once or twice before within the past two or three years? Maybe I'm giving the TPTB too much credit, but I don't they'd be that foolish.
April 5, 201114 yr Member Eh, whatever. Am I the only one who has never gotten the appeal of Howarth? I don't care for Trevor St. John either to be frank.
April 5, 201114 yr Member How is RH going to be playing a new character, when we've seen photos of RH's Todd, while Trevor was playing Todd? Will the writers think we're that stupid to forget the fact that they've shown a young Howarth as Todd in a photo once or twice before within the past two or three years? Maybe I'm giving the TPTB too much credit, but I don't they'd be that foolish. I don't either, to me this isn't like SJB returning to GH as a new character, IMO Todd is a bigger character than Carly could ever be
April 5, 201114 yr Member How is RH going to be playing a new character, when we've seen photos of RH's Todd, while Trevor was playing Todd? Will the writers think we're that stupid to forget the fact that they've shown a young Howarth as Todd in a photo once or twice before within the past two or three years? Maybe I'm giving the TPTB too much credit, but I don't they'd be that foolish. These writers have completely ignored things they wrote for Rex a month earlier even if it contradicts the next plot they had for him. I wouldnt put it past them. But again, he could be playing a new character if Irene Manning gave birth to twin boys. Edited April 5, 201114 yr by Cheap21
April 5, 201114 yr Member Eh, whatever. Am I the only one who has never gotten the appeal of Howarth? I don't care for Trevor St. John either to be frank. I thought Howarth sucked donkey balls on ATWT. A total waste of airtime on ATWT. I flove Trevor though. These writers have completely ignored things they wrote for Rex a month earlier even if it contradicts the next plot they had for him. I wouldnt put it past them. But again, he could be playing a new character if Irene Manning gave birth to twin boys. Any wonder why this soaps are being cancelled left and right??
April 5, 201114 yr Member Soapsy Trevor sucks monkey balls on OLTL, so it's a draw Roger was okay on ATWT, Paul wasn't a great character though
April 5, 201114 yr Member I thought Howarth sucked donkey balls on ATWT. A total waste of airtime on ATWT. I flove Trevor though. you my friend have good taste.
April 5, 201114 yr Member I hope RH is playing Todd's twin. We know that Margaret raped TSJ's Todd, so Sam would still be his child
April 5, 201114 yr Member No, Paul Ryan was a fantastic character who, in the hands of certain writers and actors, became a complete waste of airtime. There's a difference.
April 5, 201114 yr Member No, Paul Ryan was a fantastic character who, in the hands of certain writers and actors, became a complete waste of airtime. There's a difference. I followed RH when he fled to ATWT. Outside of his first year there, RH phoned it in as badly as he did his last 2 years at OLTL. I am hoping RH refound his dramatic chops from 93-98, as have no interest in more goofy acting.
April 5, 201114 yr Member Soapsy Trevor sucks monkey balls on OLTL, so it's a draw Roger was okay on ATWT, Paul wasn't a great character though At least Trevor is great to look at...I can't say that about Roger. you my friend have good taste. Thank You No, Paul Ryan was a fantastic character who, in the hands of certain writers and actors, became a complete waste of airtime. There's a difference. Exactly Khan!! Andrew Kavitovit as the real Todd Manning Wouldn't that be funny to see on OLTL. Andrew was always the best Paul to me followed by Scott.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.