Jump to content

Recasts


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ann Gillespe was a great Siobhan, although many found her whiny. Sarah Felder should've never been fired, but Gillespe did a good job and fit the type well. I know many loved Marg Helgenberger but I thought her look was too different and she felt like a different character. A good one, but different. And Barbara Blackburn had such potential and I hate she didn't make it big in soaps.

Right now I'm at work so I can't watch these vids but I can't wait to see Kelli Maroney in particular, asTina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Gillespie fit the type at all. She was hired precisely because she didn't fit what Siobhan was supposed to be - ABC wanted a more attractive woman.

She was OK at first, when Siobhan was written as having some personality, but as soon as Joe came back, Siobhan died as a character. It was non-stop sniveling, not helped by Ann sounding like she had a cold most of the time. Someone thought it was good conflict to have Siobhan work as a cop, which would clash with Joe's life, but I didn't buy that either (and wouldn't have with Felder) - Siobhan was always trying to change the system from the outside. That was the whole point. There was this horrible scene of her running around an obstacle course that I still cringe at.

I was also really disappointed that one of the cornerstones of Siobhan - her relationship with Jack - was reduced to Jack hectoring her and Siobhan whining to him. I guess that was the writing but I don't think Gillespie and Levin had chemistry.

I haven't seen much of Helgenberger but to me Siobhan never ever should have been saddled with Joe permanently, and this Max Dubujak doesn't sound a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Losing Marg Helgenberger was a blow, IMO, to the character of Siobhan and to RYAN'S HOPE. As you've said, Carl, it was tough, if not impossible, to buy Siobhan as a cop (even w/ the Ryans' long-standing involvement with law enforcement); yet, there was something in Helgenberger's disposition that made that transition at least somewhat credible. (Not surprising, given what she's doing these days, lol.) If she had been handed better writing, or if she had stayed around for Claire Labine's return in '87, she would've been a terrific combo of romantic heroine and level-headed "career woman"...and well, she was just gorgeous to look at, too, lol, in a completely non-soap-standard sort of way. I'd definitely rank her alongside Nancy Addison (Jillian), Helen Gallagher (Maeve), Ilene Kristen (Delia) and Kate Mulgrew (Mary) as RH's five best actresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't buy that. For one thing, it seems like a waste of production time and money (even if CR was dumped w/in a matter of days). More importantly, though, what if the audience had loved her performance so much in a so-bad-it's-good kind of way that TPTB felt compelled to keep her on? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What did you think of Sarah Felder? I loved her but I think a lot of that was down more to energy, chemistry with cast members, and emotion (she was a good actress, just not as good as some others).

I wonder how Frances Fisher would have been - they supposedly asked her to replace Gillespie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frances Fisher would have been perfect for RYAN'S HOPE -- but not as Siobhan, lol. IMO, she was/is too eccentric for that kind of character. I'd much rather see as one of the Ryan's relatives from Chicago; those seemed to be a more motley crew.

As for Sarah Felder...? Bear in mind, it wasn't until SoapNet that I actually saw any of her work on the show. Therefore, I tend to be biased toward Helgenberger. Having said that, I think Felder was terrific (probably the Second Coming of Kate Mulgrew, if you know what I mean) and it's a shame that she was let go because she didn't some idiot at ABC's standards of "pretty." Was she the definitive Siobhan? No. But she's definitely the second-best person for that role (at least to me).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watched Days pretty faithfully in the '80s and I honestly don't remember anyone other than Frank Parker and Peggy McCay in the roles of Shawn & Caroline. The other actors didn't make an impression on me, at least. Now, Elaine Princi as Linda Anderson made an enormous impression on me -- all negative. It wasn't the actress fault, but that character was not Linda Patterson by any stretch of the imagination. I never could figure why the writers didn't just invent a new character, since this Linda bore no resemblance to Margaret Mason's. I suppose it was because the character of Melissa (Linda's daughter) was front and center. But the "Madam" storyline was ill-conceived all around. (Though I did like Patsy Pease's performance -- I've always felt she's been underrated for her contribution to Days.)

AS for Ryan's Hope, I liked Sarah Felder, but Marg Helgenberger was Siobahn for me. Though years later, I saw a number of shows with Kate Mulgrew in the role, and she was dazzling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll cut the one playing Jan a tiny bit of slack since it isn't easy to play a one-note psycho with a name straight outta "Brady Bunch." But Kyle Brandt (Philip) seems lost with his shirt on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • DAYS OF OUR LIVES 10-1-1976 Doug & Julie's wedding #1 Taped on 9-16-1976, Episode #2740
    • I have just uploaded 91 mp3 files, audio only, radio episodes of Guiding Light. https://archive.org/details/guiding-light-ep-0857 Guiding Light Radio Episodes For many years Guiding Light was broadcast on radio. These are some of those episodes, audio only, of course. They are mp3 files.
    • I don't know if this will be useful. If it's not please scroll on by. If it is, great! This is Part 1 of 3.  Search For Tomorrow. (1977). Daytime TV Library Series No. 7.   Between 1975 and 1977, Daytime TV Magazine, the leading publication dedicated to US daytime programs, began a series of special editions dedicated specifically to one serial.  In early 1977, they released issue #7 which focused on the longest running serial at that time, “Search for Tomorrow”.   The publication contained interviews with key cast members and productions staff, such as the producers, directors, writer and costume designer.  It included a synopsis of the story from origin to that point, lots of pictures and a key item: What it took to make an episode of the show.   At the time, SFT was enjoying a revitalization after four years mediocre ratings.  The new producer, Mary-Ellis Bunim rose up the ranks from secretary to producer in late 1973.  Under her guidance, ratings jumped.  In the 1973-1974 ratings, “Search” placed 9th with a 7.7.  In the 1974-1975 season, it rose to a 4th with a 9.4.  At the time of this edition, it hovered around 5th with an 8.6 rating, winning its time period and coming in third of the five CBS soaps. Some of the questions posed were:             What did the title mean to the actors?             What is your opinion about the Emmys?             What character would they want to switch with?             Did the actors feel there was a bias against acting on a soap?             When did you start on the show?             What motivates your character? I will cover some here & some in other articles. Today I will cover how the show got on the air: The Show On The Air – Step by step how SFT got on the air in 1976. At the time, “Search for Tomorrow” was taped at the CBS Studio 51 & 54 on the lower West Side of Manhattan (probably the studio at W. 26th Street that was a later home to “Guiding Light”). 8:00 AM – The director of the day (there were three at the time), the production assistant and actors in the first act arrive.  Actors arrived based on the acts they were in between 8:00 AM and 9:45 AM and went to the rehearsal hall. 9:00 AM – Makeup artist and hair stylist arrive (there was one of each except for special episodes where full cast were part of the episode). 9:00 AM – Makeup artist and hair stylist arrive (there was one of each except for special episodes where full cast were part of the episode). 9:30 AM – Producer Mary-Ellis Bunim and Associate Producer Bob Getz arrive and go to their offices on the second floor. 9:45 AM – 10:15 AM – Director of the day checks sets in studio on the third floor. Actors begin make-up and hair sessions. 10:15 AM – 11:45 AM – This is the time for first rehearsal on set (called FAX) with cameras. Blocking and camera angles are perfected. 11:45 AM – 12:15 PM – First run-through in studio.  Producer and associate producer watch action in their office via CCTV.  Rough edges are smoothed out. 12:15 PM – 12:45 PM – Actors lunch break.  Notes made by producer and associate producer during run through are given to director in production office. 1:00 PM – 1:20 PM – Directors give notes to actors and studio personnel. Final touches to actors’ hair and make-up. 1:30 PM – 2:00 PM – Dress rehearsal.  Producers watch on CCTV and make final notes. 2:00 PM – 2:15 PM – Producers give final notes to directors in control room. 2:15 PM – 2:30 PM – Final notes given to actors and studio personnel by director. Notes on production elements (i.e., does liquor look real? Are props in assigned locations?) given by associate producer. 2:30 PM – 3:00 PM – Taping the episode. (SFT taped only two days before air). 3:00 PM – 3:15 PM – Tapes are checked.  If all is OK, cast is excused. Thus, “Search for Tomorrow” put on a show in LESS than SEVEN AND A HALF HOURS!  This time does not include the homework the actors and directors have to do before arriving at the studio.  Directors stated it took eight to twelve hours of homework for every episode they direct.  The producer has to spend time reading rough drafts and editing scripts, making notes for the writer, working on long-term story and character development. The associate producer spends outside office hours, organizing all facets of production elements and making sure they are all intact.  On a daily basis, auditions are held, attendance at script consultations and going over the following day’s schedule.  With luck, the producer can leave the studio between 6:00 and 7:00 PM. Written by DM James Fairbanks, Posted with permission. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • My take is that this is Audra manipulating Kyle. OC, it's not plausible that any of the things you mentioned could happen in months, much less days! Audra is a master at pushing people's buttons. Let's face it, Kyle isn't the brightest bulb thanks to Jack.  
    • And while I'm doing catch-up, it's good to see you did as well. And YES. This is how May Sweeps SHOULD be. A story climaxing. Another A story being built up as we did with the aftermath of the first A story climaxing. B plots being built up...actually moving and being interested in most of them...if not all. hehe. New story being started. And even the C plots are moving, too. 
    • It definitely did. Nothing major, but I clocked the minor changes too. Passions did something similar with its theme in the later years and people thought I was crazy, but the nuances are there if you're paying attention. 
    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy