Jump to content

Y&R: Discussion for the month of January


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The show sees Billy as a Newman. They hate the Abbott family and they Billy as superior to the Abbotts, which is the reason why they've thrown him in one story and pairing after another even as Billy Miller has tanked each of them. That's also why they had the scenes where Billy trashed John, even though Billy had grown up seeing Billy as a loving father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Victoria wants a baby that is "theirs", but I don't think she ever said it had to be theirs biologically. She was just talking to Nikki and Nick about the possibility of adoption, but wasn't sure Billy was OK with it. Of course she's going to be heart broken when the truth about this baby comes out, who wouldn't be? My only problem with this story is that Billy and Victoria are to world wise to go down this road. They could easily afford a surrogate, so it makes zero sense that Billy would buy a baby for 2 million dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sharon sounded like such an idiot telling Victor that Adam felt bad about what happened to Ashley's baby. That was sick, especially coming out of Sharon's mouth. And honestly, when has Adam felt bad? He's just constantly playing the victim from what I can see. Both characters have become so unappealing for me. I don't understand the popularity or chemistry between Adam and Sharon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I generally don't find the show as heinous as ya'll....

I do find it so disappointing that they screwed Nina's storyline over. They've done absolutely NOTHING to develop anything with Nina/Ronan. There's no bonding. No character establishment. Now he's dying, but no one cares. Because he hasn't connected to anyone on the show. Sure, Nina is worried about him...But she hasn't even had a chance to bond with him? Heather has known him for five minutes? Who else is their to grieve? What emotional impact does this storyline have? It's another cheap plot device to bring Chance back to "Save the day"...F that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the part about Ronan's dad PJ. I missed that part. It's a shame that they killed off Nina's baby daddy. There could have been plenty of story to tell there.

I figure one reason they don't have Nina and Ronan never bonded was because they weren't sure if Branson was going to stick around and they would rather have the time they do have with him in story with Riegel than Cast. The other being they wanted him to be this tough guy loner.

She did want it to be biological. She told Billy that even though they had Delia and Reed, she wanted to have his baby and she thought that it would have the best of both of them. I understand from a writing standpoint why they aren't going for a surrogacy, because they went this route already with Lily and Cane. It would be nice to see them talk about other options though.

I know it's normal to be upset about losing a child she bonded with, but with Victoria I just don't care. To me it looks like that kid would be nothing more than an accessory to the pathetic Father Knows Best fantasy she has. It's not like with Ashley where I believe she really did love Faith and wanted her to keep the baby. We've already seen Victoria whine and moan for a kid only for her to ignore him after he was born. Plus, I'm just tired of Victoria getting unearned sympathy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ronan is too new/isolated for such a story and I said that from day one. He needed bondings first, especially with Nina. But instead they used the story to put him and Heather together and give ER something to do. I'm not seeing anything interesting about this insta pairing and the focus is just too much on Heather. I do think TC/JB did great in those Nina/Ronan scenes last week but that was needed prior to this story.

What emotional impact does this storyline have? None really but the same is true for all these stories imo. Just plot point after plot point written in a fast food drive-thru type style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
    • Keith still comes off younger to me. I thought he wasn't that bad for his first day.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy