Jump to content

November 22-26, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

There are places for these types of stories to be told, I would venture to guess a prison rape story could thoughtfully told but certainly not on a show written by Bob Guza. A more thoughtful writer or maybe if it was writtin during the time AMC so beautifully wrote so many social stories it might have worked on daytime. In today's climate I just cringe at the thought of not just GH but any soap tackling an issue like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Craig killing people with no punishment and Will murdering Rose happened before similar stories on GH.

The problem with Guza "edginess" is even with daytime's censorship, he lacks the talent or the taste to make it work. Just compare Liz's initial rape story to more recent material, where her rape was first used as some sort of lurid come-on (as she confided that the man she was having an affair with was the first who had given her an orgasm since her rape), and then used to show viewers how unworthy she was as anything but a fallen woman (Lucky saying the only time she'd been worth anything was when she was bleeding to death in the snow immediately after her rape).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, after this latest truckload of posts without explanations, where opinions are presented as facts, your work here is done. :P People are impossibly stubborn in their beliefs and just love to spill the Guza hate. smile.gif

You can just see personal frustrations being reborn as "facts" and "opinions".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Those stories were both so poorly done, and the one with AJ's death was so disgusting, so typical of Guza/Pratt. I think we were supposed to get a thrill out of AJ's son murdering him.

The one with Michael killing Claudia was bizarre but seemed to be setting up something about Michael being a monster and out of control. That story was the one where someone from up high very clearly slammed the brakes hard. I also kind of wonder if that was the reason for the rape story - to somehow make Michael less wild, in their mind, and more long-suffering, like Jason is long-suffering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know that anyone is representing anything as fact. Like most anything posted on this board barring the actual ratings, most everything is opinion isn't it? Although I plead guilty for being the one to start this tirade against Guza in this thread. This really isn't the place for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GF has every right to be pissed off. The fact that they treat Tony Geary much better than her gives her every right to be.

I know damn well that if I was on a show for 20 years, part of the most popular couple in the shows history, and had given the show it's highest ratings...ever, I would be pissed for that mistreatment.

The fact is, Tony Geary didnt play Luke AND Laura. He didn't marry himself. He didn't go on adventures by HIMSELF. He was one half of a pairing that never would have been without Genie, and the fact that they wouldn't treat them both equally is ridiculous and Genie has every right to say that.

And what makes it even more ludicrous is that Tony Geary goes around bashing soap fans, telling them to get over it, showing them no respect, and trying to forget what made him famous. I've never heard Genie say one negative thing about the soap genre, the LnL pairing, and she certainly never says anything negative about fans or belittles them. And yet she is the one treated with such lack of respect?

Sexism at its finest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure where I was singing Tony Geary's praises or where you saw any of that. I think he's a pretty ungrateful *ss. I as much as said that and isn't entitled to anything. As far as Genie, I just think it's pointless for her to continue to whine about it. What purpose does it serve. She should IMO take the higher ground and just keep quiet about it and move on.

But you and I both know how sexist Hollywood is. For a culture (LA and California) that for the most part tends to lend lip service to fairly progressive issues, their treatment of women in general is the most sexist of all industies out there. Worse than the technology industry. The part that shocks me is how women who achieve some level of status and power in that industry(Anne Sweeney, Oprah Winfrey) do nothing to help improve that. But here's me off on yet another tangent and unrelated issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I find irritating beyond belief for, like, a second or two and then I don't give a damn is the victim attitude of some fans: That evil man Gugu destroyed my soap and traumatized me for life! Because of him I stopped watching and I can't take my daily drug! Now I have all these nightmares of Guza's character wrecking haunting me in my dreams and I will never forgive him! I still follow the show and all around it, and I can't get myself around my dear, poor, poor Brenda being destroyed. 'Cause I'm a masochist. And I like to pour more kerosene over my burning fires.

Please. Some people. It is a soap. A TV show. It was beautiful, wonderful when it gave me satisfaction and fulfillment, but then it got wrecked and there is nothing I can do. I can either watch or not watch. That's all. That's one of the healthier attitudes. But some people have this urge, this unstoppable need to bash Guza and blame them for everything wrong in their lives. Which is blink.gif.

And I'm not talking about you, it was in general.

And no, if you're talking to me, I didn't say you were praising Geary. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please. Let the GH fans bash Guza all they want at least for this week. Anything is better than the OLTL Defense Squad hijacking this thread every week to engage in the emotional masturbation of telling themselves (and us) that OLTL can't possible get canceled and AMC is doomed. Just let them hate on Guza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I get that. I actually stopped watching GH about a year ago and it's pointless to whine about it. My interest only got peaked when I tuned in for 1 episode to watch VM and I blame myself for that. Never should have done it. The LnL entitlement while I understand their contribution just irks me when it comes to both actors especially. While I understand their place in show history, it is history right and should be left as such. And it wasnt GF or TG that "Saved GH" it was a smart EP and HW at the time who were bold enough to try something differnt for a change. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are right about Luke & Laura.

It's actually quite sad that the show made you stop watching because you obviously have a lot of intelligent stuff to say. I wouldn't blame myself for wanting to check out Vanessa's latest return, it was natural curiosity. It killed the cat, but it was just that, curiosity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh no, I wasn't saying you were singing his praises or anything like that. I was just making the general statement.

I really don't have an opinion on LnL anymore. Will they ever be what they once were? No. Would I like seeing them together again? Sure.

All i was saying is that I dont think it's unreasonable for GF to want as much respect as TG. I think they were equal in the pairing. Also, I've never gotten the impression GF whines about anything. I know she answers questions quite honestly when she's asked about things, but I don't consider that whining, and I think it's perfectly fine for her to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy