@GL95 , I was a big fan of Maureen Garrett's Holly too. There was something about the character that I found very relatable, and like you, I wanted to grow up to be just as poised as her too. I found Garrett to be very memorable and intriguing to watch as well, and her scenes with Michael Zaslow were magic. I know winning an Emmy doesn't define an actor's abilities, but it still boggles my mind that Garrett was never awarded an Emmy. For me, she was one of the most gifted actors working in soaps when I watched. There was just such honesty about her work.
The thing that bothered me the most with the Holly and Fletcher pairing was that once they got married, the writers stopped putting Holly in Roger's orbit and vice versa. I think there was a lot of missed opportunity there, and while I do understand why some fans didn't want Holly and Roger paired as a romantic couple, I do think the characters should have orbited each other in some way, if only because their history and chemistry was so strong.
One of the reasons I got hooked on Guiding Light was because it just felt more real to me than other soaps, not to mention the acting was top-notch. I started watching it during the summer of 1988, and by the time 1996 rolled around, it just wasn't the same soap.
Instead of strong, character driven stories that explored human emotions, the writers relied on farfetched plots that compromised legacy characters such as Reva, Beth, and Holly.
I imagine it's very challenging at times to come up with compelling storylines as frequently as soaps demanded, but so many of you have done just that on this message thread.
Annette
By
GL Oldtimer ·
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.