Jump to content

October 18-22, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

OLTL's stories are too inconsistent and repetitive to really invest in -- how many times have Starr and baby been taken hostage. The show sacrificed a lot of character development for shock stories, but the stories are very very overfamiliar and not very well paced.

What featured on GH last week? I know it's probably not accurate but I still think the more they feature on Brenda and her men the more viewers might lose interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The CBS spin masters could learn something from the ones at ABC. You have to love how they make it seem like these numbers are good.

I wonder if Y&R will fall under 1 million in the 18 to 49 demo this season. This could be the year where people notice that Y&R is performing just as poorly as the other soaps.

People watch based on what happened in the past, not what is currently on screen, this is why the stunts don't work anymore, and why people didn't even tune in for the ending of ATWT. What's the point of watching an explosion, if the past history of the writers/producers has shown that the story won't go anywhere, or that the whole story is the explosion, and not how the characters deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Both OLTL and AMC had a 0.9 based on their viewer numbers in the 18-49 demo. Unlike the household ratings, which cannot be compared to total viewers, 18-49 viewers DIRECTLY compare to 18-49 ratings. Below a certain amount of 18-49 viewers (somewhere in the mid-to-upper 550,000's), a show will get a 0.8....above that, a 0.9. Since only 7,000 18-49 viewers separate B&B and OLTL, we can assume the 0.9-1.0 threshold is somewhere between OLTL's 625,000 and B&B's 632,000. In other words, OLTL is at the very high end of the 0.9 rating while AMC is at the very low end this week. A few thousand more viewers, OLTL would be at 1.0...a few thousand less, AMC would be at 0.8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just realized that it's so funny that CBS highlighted what The Talk is doing in markets where they own the station, but the flip side to this is that if the show isn't doing well for their affiliates, it wouldn't be a surprise if the affiliates either dumped the show, or moved it to another time of the day. I'm saying this, but realize that it is too early to pronounce the show dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am laughing my ass of at this! Both shows are in the shits....OLTL had or is having a big conclusing to its big Eli story and yet it drops.....lol A possilbe 0.9 demo....lol......

The Talk...yeah right ..those are impressive numbers....lol...a 1.6 rating...a 0.8 in 18-49 demo and horrible....2.1 million viewers...hahahahaha

GH....Brenda return is a big fat fuckikng failure........lol

These ratings are laughable pathetic!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS has to be very happy with The Talk's ratings. It didn't bomb and even though they are slightly behind what ATWT did, CBS is still ahead of the game because of the much cheaper production costs of The Talk. CBS is already a winner in this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria's attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
    • Thanks for finding that. I may have been thinking of this blog entry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy