Jump to content

Is ABC Daytime About to Announce a Two-Year Pick Up For One Life to Live?!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm tired of this whole 'the genre is dommed' talk. Soap viewers aren't looking for NCIS or lost: The production values are higher but it is a very different style of story telling. I don't see more and more soap fans flipping to Law and Order on TNT at 2pm. I actually think soap ratings gains are possible and we've been seeing this happen this season with Days, ATWT and GH. Yes, some ex fans have returned but it has to be assumed that some new fans have tuned in. As for the issue of the ATWT finale, it was a slow ratings build up and the poor writing didn't even deserve a 1.9 HH. We all get to focused on week to week gain and looses but, aside from the PGP shows, soaps are slightly up as a whole for the year. Y&R has a slight gain on top of its already bloated ratings and OLTL is doing really well in key demos. The only show that I see as in possible danger is AMC--they should have never fired Pratt who, regardless of style, was moving ratings upward.

A few shows will live albeit possibly not on daytime or on their current network. Airing new content on daytime (when a lot of people are working) is an outdated formula and, eventualy, the network will follow cable's lead and make a shift into prime time when you have max viewership. This, or we will all be downloading shows through something like iTunes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, ratings gains are still possible, but [broken record] nothing is possible without good story [/broken record]. But good luck convincing TPTB of that.

Frankly, I don't care whether OLTL ever gets renewed again at all. This show "died" for me a long time ago. Now, it's just an excuse to watch Mark Lawson flex for a whole hour -- and I can get that from soaphunks.net!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True, remember reading a story about how Gen X can't write and it would seem the boomers are burnt out. Gen X is sort of a bridge generation which seems to lack a solid style or emotional subtext. Different for the sake of different doesn't cute it. I am X and noticed this a lot in various writing classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They can't write for it, b/c so-called irony can never compensate for a tight dramatic structure or (in the case of sitcoms) a well-crafted joke setup and punch line. (There's also such a thing as writing from character and not from pop culture reference. In order to accomplish that, however, you have to realize that what works IRL (i.e., sitting on your couch, snarking at characters on TV screens and laptops) doesn't always work as drama. In drama, characters are supposed to live fuller lives.)

Well, the problem there is that editors and writers believe they have to dumb down the content in order to make it more easily digestible for those who are becoming used to downloading that [!@#$%^&*] on their phones and as such, are developing shorter and shorter attention spans. Problem? Attention spans are decreasing, b/c they're making them decrease. BITD, if you really wanted to understand what's going on in the world, you kinda had to stretch your brain a bit. If we could do it once, surely, we can do it again!

Always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm of the mindset that elites have taken it upon themselves to dumb down various forms of story and that it all stems from a blanket condescention for the 'masses'. A lot of change occured during the 1970's and all this 'short attention span' talk is really code for 'add 5 affirmative points'. It is as if these writers really think the vast majority of watchers/readers can't follow their 'brilliance'. Also, this is a generation trying to define it's own style with each writer hoping to be the post-modern Bill Bell.

So much of this has to do with money. I remember all the talk about viewers having no interest in international news. This is totally untrue. Networks don't want to spend the money on global reportage. The same is true with the sitcom and drama. Tight story often costs more money while loose plots require less cast and lower production values.

I can't email out of this system (no idea why) so drop me an email about your writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe this will help put those pesky cancellation rumors to rest. TV Guide Magazine has exclusively learned from ABC that the network recently struck new deals with One Life to Live executive producer Frank Valentini and head writer Ron Carlivati. Valentini, who yesterday celebrated his 25th anniversary with OLTL, has signed a two-year contract to remain with the show. Carlivati's contract is for three years. Unlike CBS and NBC, ABC actually owns its daytime dramas, so the concept of a show pick-up doesn't really apply here. Thus, this news is as close as it comes to ABC acknowledging its commitment to keep the show on the air. Next week, I'll bring you the first post-deal interview with Valentini and Carlivati, in which they discuss their new lease on Life and where they plan to take the show in the future. In the meantime, can we all just relax a little bit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • the famous babyswitch. the best babyswitch imo
    • Yes, it has. It was seen in the episodes when Dani broke into the house while Hayley and Bill were on their honeymoon. Dani and a Fairmont Crest security guard were also shown outside the house's entrance. Bill and Hayley were seen in the foyer when they returned. I imagine the set will resurface when there's a need for it.
    • There is some kind of arrangement going on between Justin and Evie, who seems to be caring for Sam. I'm not sure, but she may even be living there with Justin and Phillip. Phillip inviting Evie at least makes a little more sense (if the guest list was limited to women Vanessa liked, it would've only consisted of Trish and Helena. lol)  Maybe it was more common to hang on to performers, back in the day? Instead of immediately kicking them to the curb? Evie hadn't had much to do after Chet was revealed to be her stalker. With Rita, Jackie and Ben gone, there weren't many on the canvas she'd really worked with, other than Ross. They could've pivoted her back to Ross, instead of letting him languish love-less for nearly a year other than goo-goo eyeing Amanda. Nowadays, there might've been a moment written Jordan and Janet, an eye-wink to the audience about them having previously worked together.
    • I 100% agree that Bill and Haley's set would work better as a bedroom. I also think it might have made more sense to give them a penthouse instead of a mansion. Realistically they aren't going to have the room for multiple mansions, even with the larger studios. A more open concept penthouse would've been fine. I also wish more people lived together. The age confusion kinda messes that up but I would at least have Chelsea living with Dani. If Martin were Anita and Vernon's child (as he should be), I'd have these families living together as well. By doing that, the space used for Martin and Smitty's house could be used to build a dining room for the Dupree home and I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to throw a couple bedrooms in as needed.
    • CBS primetime was such a mess in the 1990s. 1990/91 fourth consecutive third place finish. 1991/92 to 1993/94 some signs of life but it didn't last.  1994/95 to 1999/2000 another primetime mess era. 1995 the sale to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. The only bright spots were Touched by an Angel becoming a Top 10 show and Everybody Loves Raymond starting to show growth. CBS primetime would have a comeback in 2000 with the premieres of Survivor and CSI and Everybody Loves Raymond becoming a Top 10 show, and the rest is history.
    •  Thanks! For some reason I had misremembered ER and Chicago Hope going directly head to head but that may have been because of the hype about both shows.    Poor Connie Chung. She seem poised for success and possibly the next Barbara Walters. I don’t recall her co-anchor gig on the CBS Evening News was well received though. She kind of tanked her career moving into more a tabloid journalist role once at ABC and especially once she moved off network TV to CNN and later more infamously on MSNBC. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Strangely, it was Phillip who invited Evie to go to the ball with him. She had been taking care of Samantha, so I guess it was a way to thank her for helping Justin after Jackie's death? So she was not invited by Vanessa. Phillip brought her as his plus one. That Evie stayed on the canvas so long is extremely odd, especially since Ben was gone way before her. My theory is Marland was going to bring Rita back, so they wanted Evie to remain in place as her sounding board. When he left and Potter was still EP, that might have still been the plan. Once Kobe came in, that would have been thrown in the dumpster along with a lot of other story plans and characters.
    • Nina and Portia are generally presented as entirely too savvy to not think this ketamine (don't even GET me started on that) nonsense wouldn't immediately blow up in their face. Drew, the ex-navy seal and congressman, wouldn't get a drug test immediately after acting wildly out of character? Portia allowed this to so easily be traced back to her by roping in Brad, a man who can't stand her? Nina didn't think Willow would Stand By Her Man? Girl, PAY ATTENTION! I also find it disturbing how BOTH of them are gaslighting Willow. It feels gross. They should have presented Gio as anything other than a responsible, genial and affable guy if they wanted us to buy any of Dante's ranting about him. You've known this kid since he was a baby and suddenly you're yelling at him like he's the devil incarnate? It was so forced. Every one of them, including Dante, know that they all would have done the same thing in Gio's shoes. Teen gets drunk, friends cover for them. Gio's only 5 years older than him, barely allowed to legally drink himself. How was he to know the kid had alcohol poisoning? Alexa Havins crying every day over keeping a baby secret. Ahh memories. Molly and Kristina are just the worst to their mom and Alexis allows it. Kristina does need to be committed, she's a danger to herself and others. I wish Alexis would just tell her that she knows. I can't wait until Molly finds out about her almost getting Ric and Liz killed. I need her to body slam Kristina. Sasha thinks she knows EVERYTHING. She's always giving advice and painted as right no matter what. And so holier than thou while carrying a married man's baby.
    • Correction, Chicago Hope 1994/95 was initially Thursday 9 pm, a CBS dead zone and head-to-head w/ Seinfeld. 1994/95 CBS Thursday 10 pm initially was Eye to Eye with Connie Chung. Later in the season CBS did a scheduling shift with Chicago Hope moving to Monday 10 pm, Eye to Eye with Connie Chung moving to Thursday 9 pm, and 48 Hours moving from Wednesday 10 pm to Thursday 10 pm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy