Jump to content

Blacks In Soaps or How To Be On a Daytime Drama For Years and Never Have a Real Storyline


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It figures threads like these have 5+ pages, mostly of mud-slinging.

Tyler Perry's shows and movies have been successful, but guess who its target audience is? Duh. Now you have some blacks in the public sector who criticize him because they think his shows dabble in the fine art of "stereotyping". This sort of criticism is no different than the ones who complained that "The Cosby Show" was flaunting that dreadful idea of blacks being "Oreos". So my question is this: how the hell should black people be portrayed on television? Why doesn't BET create a mandate stipulating that all blacks in television should be in black written/produced/directed/casted shows on their network. Wounds healed, right. WRONG. Then you'll have the same blacks in the media and the media in general screaming over the fact that this is blatant segregation.

In all honesty, "diversity" and integration have been failures. That's the bottom line. White shows that were forced to become "diverse" tanked ("Friends", anybody?). I don't seem to recall black shows being forced to have whites on their shows to achieve "racial harmony". I have a Soap Opera Digest from 1980 where this mantra of "Blacks In Soaps" was rehashed and this time the whiner was Irving Allen Lee (Calvin Stoner, EDGE). My feeling is this: people like Lee, Andrews, etc. should be lucky they were even hired to be on a soap opera back then. And Lee played a cop, which to Jefferson was no doubt a disgrace but what would she prefer him to be--a rocket scientist, a biochemical engineer? And having watched EDGE throughout most of his tenure on the show, Lee was part of an ensemble storyline mostly but did have a joint storyline here and there, mainly from 1982-84. He was never backburnered.

I think the vast majority of you have your heads buried way deep in the sand and are living your lives through blinders when it comes to race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Can someone answer the question? If you feel you're being mistreated, insulted or misrepresented WHY ARE YOU WATCHING IT? In all of these redundant threads dominated by redundant people who swear they speak for black viewers everywhere (HA! Only if my tongue's ripped out -- even then, I'll grunt like a primate before I let them speak for me), that question always seems to be deflected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't try to speak for anyone else, so I guess I have to go back to putting a thousand IMO/"for me" cocktails in my posts, but then again, I don't know if you're referring to me, so if you're not, my bad.

But anyway, I watch something if I'm entertained by the characters and the stories. I don't have a one track mind, so it is possible for me to be entertained by something while also finding huge flaws in it. Sometimes there more things that I dislike than things that I like (ex: OLTL), sometimes there are more things that I like than I dislike (ex: AMC, sometimes ATWT), but regardless of what I like or don't like, I think I still have the right to voice my opinions on both matters without having to pick one side or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re: Ellen Holly, she did in fact leave One Life for a short period of time. IIRC from her book, that was due to her unhappiness with the show/her character and her desire to pursue more work in the theatre. Upon her return, Miss Holly found it to be a real head-scratcher that Carla was suddenly the law degreed D.A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is how I feel.

I watch two shows regularly (AMC and OLTL; bits and pieces of Y&R when my brother's got it on) that by no coincidence are the two shows I have watched practically my entire life. I would describe my present soap fandom as a mix of being legitimately entertained, and at times almost begrudgingly "too far in" to just give up shows and characters that have provided me with greater viewer enjoyment in the past. No one is forcing me to keep up with Dorian, no one is forcing me to call my cousin from South Carolina either even though I know I should while it's often the last thing I feel like doing. Frankly, I'd rather watch OLTL than call my cousin, but I digress... Now more than ever there is SO much room for improvement on these shows with the lack of minority representation being one of a myriad of problems. I feel like a giant clusterfuck of industry inbreeding, focus groups, too many (often uncreative, unqualified) cooks in the kitchen, chasing primetime, chasing pop culture, chasing youth, blaming O.J., blaming cable, blaming the viewer has cost soaps what little integrity they had (and what great creativity they ALWAYS had but was slept on) leaving us with too many vapid pretty people and mediocre if not appalling storylines. For me, there was always the hope for renaissance, and I still believe that will happen, just not in the way I would have liked to see it happen.

It's too easy to say that black folks in the business should just pull up their bootstraps and make it do what it do. Today it's easi-er, but still not easy. Oprah, Tyler, Cathy Hughes and the like have the power and the platforms, too bad they didn't when soaps were at their prime and the idea of a black soap is something the industry and fans would have been more excited about. Tyler could pitch a black soap with his hack writers to TV One tomorrow and it would probably get the green light, but a. Would it be good?, and b. Is he even interested? Probably no to both. IMO, black faces are not enough, you've really got to come with it. How incredibly blessed would we be if David Simon, Ed Burns, George Pelecanos, Rafael Alvarez (and the late David Mills) delivered us a daytime serial? That's what I'm talking about. That level of writing matched with the self-owned networks and connections of the Oprah/Tyler/Cathy types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think, burried in all you say, you have a handful of good points :P Well maybe 2. Still--but this one is just BS--Friends was canceled because it have reached the end of its welcome. I don't buy diversity was forced on it and in fact I remember many liked Ross' Black GF (whose name I can't even remember...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
    • All caught up on this week's episodes. Deidre Hall has done the best work of her career with this series of episodes. That is her tribute to Drake. Every acting choice has been perfect. From her reaction the moment John flatlined, to her snapping at Abe and Paulina (what a smart, realistic writing choice), to her grief playing the text message over and over. Josh Taylor did the best work of his career in the scene with Kayla telling him John had died. Everything about his facial expression, voice, pronunciation, everything was so different from what he usually does. He was overcome with the emotion of it and any of his acting tics disappeared. Peter Reckell and Kristian Alfonso were great. One thing I noticed with the flashbacks of John/Marlena and Bo/Hope is that Bo and Hope are constantly smiling at each other. The chemistry those two have cannot be faked. It's clear the writing team decided to clean up Bo and Hope and give fans a happy ending for them, neatly wrapped up in a bow. The juxtaposition of Bo and Hope reclaiming their happiness thanks to John, while Marlena is dealt life's harshest blow from John's sacrifice, was another great writing choice. Marlena even saying that to Eric, that she is paying for Bo's recovery with John's life, was such smart writing. Susan Seaforth Hayes was used very effectively between the two storylines. I really enjoyed the scene of Kate talking to Philip, calmly stating that she will make Xander pay. Overall, the show should be lining these episodes up for the Emmys and Deidre should be carefully choosing her scenes for her own reel. She deserves a Best Actress Emmy for this work. The first time I have felt that way about her work. Peter Reckell should submit himself for Guest for the scenes where he found out Victor is dead because he was genuinely heartbreaking. Josh Taylor should throw his name down for Supporting Actor for his scenes. The show deserves a Writing and Best Show for what they've done with the episodes around John and Bo. It was heavy stuff and I feel for the actors. I am so impressed with what they did.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy