Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Come on, you gotta admit that there was no need for Paul to go in on Dawn like that in her home. That fighting was unneceary and he provoked. I liked Lauren at first but her ass was super messy to go along with it and see nothing wrong with her husband instigating a fight with another woman. Im glad Cynthia isnt like that bc I may have to drop her.

I hope it comes back too bc it took a while to get going but it was quite a good show towards the end. I think they had good casting. Dawn, Magali, Ampika and Lauren were AMAZING cast members and they are the core four that need to stay. Tanya and LeAnne were kind of duds. I could take or leave them but I guess they round things out a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4961

  • Taoboi

    4020

  • Cat

    4012

  • NothinButAttitude

    3973

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

RHoBH

Brandi: Time to get off the cross, silly bitch. She really has no comprehension of how her actions have compounded effect and that everyone brings up her terrible behaviour because it's all the material she gives them.

Kim: Addicted pig, constantly screaming she's sober (I just don't believe it). The house conflict is a huge joke because Kyle caught Kim in the simplest of lies, about the house not being in escrow because she wanted Brooke and Farrah to do the listing, and Kim couldn't do a thing about it except shrug her shoulders and scream that Kyle was lying like a high toddler...even though she wasn't and it was plain as day that Kim had just shown her ass in terms of how she lies. She's basically in an abusive relationship with Kyle, the way she came into the kitchen and told her she loved her as Kyle is standing their sobbing over her burned steak? Kim is a sicko and it's high time she was fired.

Kyle: It's time she cuts the cord with Kim because as much as I'm not a Kyle fan, she's being abused by her drunk of a sister. She's better off without her. That house conflict, I mean...Kyle has the cancelled cheques! There's no disputing what she's said! I loved the shade she threw about Kim not being able to carry a mortgage. Kathy, much as I adore her judgmental stare, should really cut Kyle some slack because Kim has been given way too many chances. There is nothing for Kim and Kyle to work through, it's time to end it all. It's destructive and disgusting.

Yolanda: Seeing her with that vitamin drip while Brandi had a facial. So sad. I wish Yolanda good health, she redeemed herself in the last few episodes to some degree.

Eileen and Lisa Rina basically did nothing this episode and I'm cool with that: they have been old fashioned successes this season and I really, really hope they both return. Make it happen Andy!

Lisa V: She looked glorious officiating the gay wedding. It's interesting to hear her say she's not going to launch any more restaurants, as that's been her life and Ken's life for nearly 30 years. I hope she stays for next season, though if she doesn't then she's exiting on a real high. She's avoided all the nonsense, and lives a glorious life. She wins. And she should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not that it wasn't super rude and super messy of Paul to go in on Dawn in her home, but I couldn't help but love watching it because Dawn's lorded over everyone the entire season, so it was great to see a total blowhard like Paul capsize her "Legendary Dawn Ward Dinner Party"...I understand Lauren and Paul because they're *very* English and *very* old school and they shoot to kill, they don't play games.

I agree that Tanya and Leann are kind of duds, but they do round things out, particularly Tanya whose just sort of there and inoffensive. It will be interesting to see if ITV renews the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He definitely provoked things but it was funny. But I do disagree about Lauren and Cynthia. Cynthia does need to be like Lauren b/c Lauren is not afraid to drop sh-t on the table. She says it and moves on. Cynthia needs to stop stumbling over things.

I enjoy Tanya and I want her to stay. Leanne I can do without, but I want her to stick around b/c I know Dawn will eventually flip on her and it'll be sheer joy to see it all go down.

That's what I get from them--that they are very English and old school. I thought I would've gotten that from Dawn but I didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that Eileen should be seated next to her soap bestie, but isn't Yolanda cutting out early? I thought it was reported she was only there a couple hours.

It would be awkward (although fitting) for it to be the four ladies vs the two trolls once Yolanda leaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dawn's new money, she's common, and she knows it. The class system, despite Downton Abbey's protestations, is alive and well in England. Lauren was the only member of the cast who was born and raised in Cheshire. Now, Northern English people, where Cheshire is, are always going to be slightly rougher and more gobby than Southern English people, the stereotype exists for a reason. It was plainly obvious to me that Lauren has a certain confidence from growing up in the posh set and that even someone as pushy as Dawn couldn't undermine that. Throw in Paul, who is a posh public school boy if there ever was one, and you've got all the makings of a Cheshire power couple. They're old school English and to hell with anyone who messes with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you. I was hoping a Housewives reunion expert would let us know of previous instances where the person sitting closest to Andy still got the boot next season, but I couldn't think of any off the top of my head.

This shall be awkward, if Eileen goes in (I hope!) on Kim, and they're sitting right next to each other? No Rosie/Elizabitch split screen fun for them? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Basic script work; if it hadn't been for Jane Elliot and Rena Sofer, it could've been for any random character.
    • Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't. But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.   Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here.  I am just wasting my time even responding.    
    • This is a common theme with long running actors and preposterous storylines. Firstly they may relish the chance to play something different after years as that character-Ok I have an evil twin, possessed by the devil etc-at least it's something new to play. Secondly, no matter how dumb the plot it keeps them frontburner and valued to the show and the audience. Better than being a talk to. Thirdly, as VW stated in the end they don't have the power to dictate story and too much complaining can backfire and set them up in a negative light. Not a good position to be in with your employers. So they just buckle up and give it their all or act out the script till it's over.
    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy