Jump to content

Wisner Washam interview


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Part 1 was just posted on welovesoaps.com. I've been waiting for an interview with him for years, and finally seeing one totally made my day. Hell, it made my month. I need to get a life LOL. I assume parts 2 and 3 will be posted over the next several days. There's also a very recent interview with his wife, Judith Barcroft (ex-Ann, AMC; ex-Lenore, AW, among various soap roles) just posted in their interview archive. Enjoy.

http://www.welovesoaps.net/2010/02/wisner-washam-interview-part-1-of-3.html#more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

HAHA okok, I just like bugging you cuz of your Agnes bias ;) Of course Wisner is pretty much co headwriter (sometimes credited as full, even though for much of it Agnes still was tops--or co creditedwith Broderick for chunks of the 80s) for anything 1975-1990 in some capacity. So many of the classic eps on youtube are partly his work. I'll be interested though (ages from now when you'e seen some) if you think you can spot what's his work and what's Nixon's--though to be fair I think for much of it they worked as a team... Certainly, in All Her Children's chapter on Wisner he mentions that everything helearned about how to plot and sturcture a soap as well as the style of stories he does,k he learned from Agnes directly, but his definition of being more of a realist, does make sense (even if Agnes already is more of a realist in how she writes then, say, Bell).

(I hope that the further parts of the interview go into exactly what their working relationship was and even what stories or eras he was more involved in, etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The feeling was probably that there were too many major families on the show at that time. I think the Martins would've been gone by that point too, if not for the incredible popularity of Michael E. Knight. He clearly carried that family from the 80s and on. If not for him, it's hard to imagine the Martins lasting as long as they have. The Tylers never produced THAT popular a young actor to center the family around. Brooke, of course, was a Tyler by exntension, but by the late 80s she seemed to be more defined by whatever family she'd married into--the Chandlers or the Martins. She kind of languished when not connected to those families. Although Agnes/Wisner had the Tylers morph into the Wallingfords, it did seem like they deliberately stopped the Tyler line by killing off Chuck & Donna's son Johnny and Paul & Ann's daughter Beth, and not having Linc and Kelly have any kids of their own. I'd kill to know her exact reason for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What AW stories do you think of as DOOLish? I mean AW, in a very positive way was KNOWN for its comedic elements. From Iris's maid, Vivian, to the naming of plants, to highjinks with Cass, Felicia, Wally & even Lily, plus remember Dee Evans & Tony the Tuna? In a way at one time DAYS had similar with Caliope & Eugene. 
    • Were those reasons to do with having younger children on set? Other shows seem to manage. The ageing up of the kids has been one of the mistakes the show has made.
    • I agree.  Lemay was supposed to start in early 88 and we saw some of the writing on the wall with character reference from the past.  Notably, the core families Frames, Cory, Matthews.  The stupid Reginald Love was wrapped up.  Not even a year later Mary was written out of the show along with Vince and the McKinnons who came and left .  The previous writers tried to introduce a new family that never aspired with the viewers.  1988 was focused on the 25th anniversary of show in 1989 and suspect why Lemay was asked to come back in 88.  Prior to 1988, the storylines were so DOOL stupid.
    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Assuming that Marland had been allowed to write the Carrie story the way he'd envisioned, Millette would've been involved in the story. And she might've played a role in Andy Norris' return (if the speculation on that had ever materialized, and Marland loved bringing back bad boys) But he doesn't seem interested in Sara's personal life. And the women of Springfield could only be analyzed so much.
    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy