Jump to content

January 25-29, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Carl, how do you really feel? I hate the misognyny in Pratt/Guza soaps, but they crafted that story so well for that type of reveal outcome. BUT yeah misogyny is a stupid little bitch. I agree that the rape fascination in that story is beyond bizarre.

I'm going to be really interested in seeing what happens with the ratings with Sonny being more of a force. Love or hate the SOB/mob focus, you can almost correlate GH's stronger than usual drops with them making him secondary in stories. This story appears to be more of a vechile for him. Appears ... we'll see what happens.

I think that has to be it, their 12-17 demo isn't good so it appear the 50+ has been giving them an edge in HH. Either 50+ or male viewers, a demo/category I never pay attention to for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the problem is the story has had no motivation, and it flies too much in the face of history, both past and recent. They were so blatant in hey, let's do this to show everyone how much we love JJ's Lucky, and the rest of the story is an afterthought. They managed to kill most of what was good about JJ and BH as Liz and Lucky, and after the way various characters have acted towards Lucky over the past few years it's hard to get onboard now that they are suddenly his boosters. I don't know why the show thought the only way to welcome him back was to have a big "Lucky is too good for this whore" story. That wasn't what JJ's Lucky was about.

I think that focusing on Sonny and Dante would improve ratings. I would think that the almost constant drops during the Franco story might tell them Jason needs a long rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think the Liz story was setup well at all. She and Nikolas fall into bed at the drop of a hat, all of a sudden despite spending no time together other than sex they are in love, then returns REALLUCKY to get cheated on again and now no longer the town loser, everyone is now on his side and his best friend. Add this to the fact that practically this same story all the way to the product of Liz and Jason's affair is being repeated just 2 years later with the same 2 characters involved before. I suppose we'll find out Liz also has some mental illness when she slept with Jason and his kid and lied to Lucky before also. And with that this discussion belongs in the GH thread. No more from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Thank you...I don't mind a fall from grace story no problem but damn give the girl something that's all I'm saying level the playing field so I can get a good triangle instead of a trash heap.

its soo written for Lucky its mind boggling the dialog is atrocious and too immature for these adults...I like JJ/Lucky and Elizabeth and never thought I'd ever see them together again and waited ten years so give their fans some of their old feeling some warm and fuzzy before lowering the boom. Instead they are yet in another endless triangle (that's all they are ever written) with a WTD to boot that should be coming round the bend somehow with Becky's pregnancy I fear it will.

I too adore Dante!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't watch GH regularly but from doing the spoilers for the show, there's not one point you made that I can argue against. The story came out of nowhere, didn't have any real motivation, it was done for the sake of being done with little thought to the heart of the characters and pairings involved. Point A to Z with no care for stops B thru Y. That's damaging and looking at it like you laid it out I can definitely see why it isn't any type of draw although I admittingly enjoyed that Monday episode dealing with the reveal.

I barely remember what the story was about (Martha Byrne, Claudia, good cast integration - coming back to me), but a one week gain doesn't mean GH ails are cured. If GH can't maintain a more healthy rating with Maurice moving to a stronger story, the same would be true for my/our theory that the ratings may improve with his character becoming less secondary as well as less dumbed down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Regarding confusion about why "online hate" doesn't translate into general viewer hate (i.e., lower ratings).

Don't forget that that can because many soap opera viewers "love to hate". I obviously speak mostly about my main show (Y&R), where hating Victor (being outraged at whatever atrocity he dreams up next...what rude phrase he tosses off...watching people twist themselves into pretzels to have some influence on him) has been a major part of audience loyalty over the years.

My guess is that characters like Sonny, Victor (and historically, folks like Vivian and Stefano on Days) are pot stirrers. It's not just THEIR stories, but it is the fact that they often are the center of umbrella stories and larger character groupings, and this gives the show some "cast integration" (to use Angela's term) and also momentum.

Many people may DETEST the Sonnys and the Victors...but they are still compelled to see what next horror they perpetrate. Likeability may be over-rated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sonny and Victor aren't written as being bad people. They're written as being wonderful people, although with Sonny, there are a few people who can call him out (just not too much, or they will be destroyed). Victor is such a god to those at Y&R that the entire canvas has been demolished for him. Even at GH I don't know if they would give Sonny someone's heart and then have him declare war on that person's family for no real reason.

I wonder how much of an impact Victor has on numbers at this point. The ratings didn't go down when Victor left and they actually went down the week he returned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All the ABC Soaps have all gone back to their quality ways although OLTL has been consistently acing quality for the last couple of years now. Hopefully with AMC and GH getting back on track OLTL can finally pick up their leftover ratings and and all ABC Soaps are back over the 2.0 range and 3 million viewers mark on a regular basis.

I can feel it just like DAYS this is going to be AMC's comeback year.

Lately especially this past week it seems like AMC is finding its touch again as a quality soap. The first sign of this might be their move to LA and changing the show's look to HD, it has become an easy soap on the eyes again. The second sign is that the writing on the show has improved big time. I like the close-net character element that the show is getting to. Its like they left off from 2004 and finally picked back up to 2010. I heard Pratt's writing isn't in the picture anymore so that might be a positive sign going forward.

Somebody finally woke this show back up from obscurity. I don't have a problem watching the characters I saw last week like I did in the past. It wasn't even that hard watching Greenlee and Ryan's scenes.

This show might finally be back and with this being the start to a new decade. This might be a very good 10 years for the show. We can only hope right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Especially when you consider Days, Y&R and AMC all run up against each other in the East. I know each soap have its popular region but, even with that, you'd have a huge bloat of viewers. Something always seems off. I wonder if SoapNet harms ABC daytime's numbers? Daytime plus SoapNet must give AMC and OLTL a huge following, though. I guess that is why AMC and Life have so many threads. PGP should have found a cable channel years ago for a daily second run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the way to her own engagement party? I've read that the show had trouble getting the audience to sympathize with Rita, but...that seems bizarre. Maybe I can understand the issue with the censors, given that at the time, rape wasn't depicted the way it is now, and marital rape was even less acknowledged.  Wasn't Chris Brooks' rape one of the first honest stories on the subject? I just don't think I could get into a show I didn't have a working knowledge of. I know it's a different era, but I really tried to get into GH once Maura West joined, but it just never jelled.
    • Yes it was! My mom and I convinced my dad to get one. He was--how shall I put this?--on the thrifty side, but one day he came home with one as a surprise. To this day, I'm convinced it fell off a truck. (He knew people with "connections."

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) BUT, we had our VCR and we could watch our soaps. That thing lasted forever! It was built like a tank. Even when we got new ones with more features, we kept that one.
    • Please register in order to view this content

        Blasphemy!  (Haha, I get it.  But, you should try watching AMC! 80s-90s was so good.)
    • I thought about saying how I resented the fact that those two newbies were tripping up the Puppetmaster of all Puppetmasters, when the best others could do was a stalemate (or less...). But, well...*sigh*
    • I read years ago that both Zaslow and Lenore both complained that it came off as a seduction because of CBS censors, so Lenore asked if she could say, "you raped me" to leave no doubt with the audience, and that Zaslow insisted that Holly's rape played realistically 
    • Wow it’s official, Gatwa is out… https://www.avclub.com/ncuti-gatwa-addresses-doctor-who-finale-statement DW fandom on Reddit is in a furor over how things went down and apparent last minute scrapping of the original ending. Also…Billie Piper again really?
    • He comes pretty close, talkin' about how Reva is full of love and joy, blah blah....which is bilge considering he was the one responsible for throwing her out of Josh's life over working with Alan. 
    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy