Jump to content

ATWT Canceled


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes I do. The OLTL trainwreck is my personal fave.

As for ATWT, my mom watched ATWT for years. When I told her that ATWT got canceled, she was surprised it was even still on. She's not like me. She didn't leave soaps out of anger or disappointment, she just lost interest and found something else. If you asked her why, I'm not sure she could even tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 533
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

See that I believe it truer than anything else. Why has reality TV taken over primetime? Why is it that primetime rarely gives a show today more than a few weeks to generate interest or draw an audience and if it doesn't it gets cancelled. Money. In Primetime, the days of critically acclaimed shows like Cheers or Taxi or even L&O when it first started airing would never ever be given the opportunities to stick today like they were back years ago. One show is gone, they quickly replace it with another or a cheap reality show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But you notice the same thing doesn't seem to happen with shows developed for stations like USA, TNT, Lifetime or HBO or Showtime or even Bravo. Those shows seem to be given more of a chance to succeed or else they just don't have the same demands in terms of audience volume because they have revenue sources other than advertising dollars.

Getting off topic I guess

But I think the original stmt was probably true. If the networks had something less costly that could generate comparable viewing numbers or revenue, no doubt soaps would be gone. I'm actually shocked they haven't gone to showing reruns of popular shows during those timeslots like many of the successful cable stations like TNT and Lifetime have done. Heck it was I think TNT's original deal of showing L&O reruns that helped generate more viewing and interest in the show on primetime. NCIS reruns on USA certainly has seemed to help the numbers for the show on CBS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have been with this show the entire 56 year's. I will miss it dearly. Another part of my life is ending AGAIN. I knew when P&G sent GL writer's to ATWT's they wanted it GONE. I said this over and over on the internet. You don't send writer's that sink one show over to "save" another show. They want these soap's gone because they cost to much money to pay the cast. I can understand they want to be rid of them but to tell viewer's they are "trying to find a new home" so we don't stop buying thier product is degrading to all of us that has watched most of our lives. If I had to buy a P&G product they would be out of business. Not because they cancelled these show's but because they have lied to us so much. I haven't watched any CBS show except ATWT's since Gl's cancellation and I will never watch any CBS show. They can go straight to hell as far as I am concerned. I don't accept it when my son lie's to me and I won't stand for it when anyone else does either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly envy those of you who have expressed a cold acceptance of "the death of soap operas." I think those of us who are fans of ATWT or OLTL or Days or whatever are also being made to feel somewhat stupid for caring. By Les Moonves -- and by people here on SON. Perhaps this is our way of beating ourselves up over the slow, painful end of Daytime drama.

I remember feeling heartbroken when the soaps I loved were cancelled. I remember discovering AW after it had been taken off the air and mourning the fact that I never embraced this gem when it was around. I honestly believe that ATWT, for all its faults, has been snatched from us before its time.

Man, I wish I could not care! I wish I could walk away and easily replace my viewing of a soap with, say, People's Court or L&O! But none of these shows excite my imagination the way a soap does. I am not emotionally invested in them. I love the soap opera. I love the way it used to be and sometimes I love the way it still is. A habit, an addiction, perhaps. But I do not want these shows to leave! It's not the same as saying goodbye to a Primetime show which put in three solid seasons. For one thing, PT has the DVD sales to fall back on. We Daytimers should be so lucky. If the daily serial leaves, then its loss will leave a void. There isn't really anything on TV that fills that void for me.

I wish I were a super-rich philanthropist and could subsidize a handful of soaps on a particular network, to be shown between 5-8pm! I swear I wouldn't be a Bloom. I'd buy out all the advertising time, bribe the affiliates, handpick competent and dedicated talent, and try and nurture the genre back to health. LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I don't think people are trying to make other people feel stupid. I do, however, think that some are trying to say that you should be careful with what you wish for and careful with deceiving yourself. None of these executives, and now even some writers, producers and directors, cares anymore. They've been burnt too many times, and fans were burnt too. So it's not people saying to other people You're a moron!, it is people being cautious and accepting the reality. In some degree or totally. Everyone here likes a soap opera, SON does not need another division, and especially not the one those who love soaps and those who do not. That just creates more toxic fumes and nasty fights.

People would take advantage of you and you would go straight into bankruptcy and ruin.

Don't kid yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My intention is not to create division on SON. At all. I know people here love soaps. I am just envious about the ones who are clear-eyed about Daytime's fate (and I'm still pissed off at Moonves laughing about it). ATWT was never "my" show but it was one I kept up with and the news has hit me harder than I thought. IMO ATWT had the best actors in all of Daytime. I wish I could feel rationally about all of this but I can't, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy