Jump to content

All: Claire Labine Interview


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Her children were heavily involved with her on GH, she admits that.

I'd love to see what Matt and Elanor could do as a team on any of the existing soaps, if Claire doesn't want to return to daytime.

But I did hear just a few years ago Claire was asked if she'd ever return to daytime, and she said she'd like to, but nobody's asked her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I loved this, this is how a brilliant intuitive writer views their work of art:

We Love Soaps: But many at the time were very critical of you, and considered the show to be “too depressing.” What do you think of that criticism?

Claire Labine: That’s ridiculous. If they were paying attention, Wally and Rena [Ned and Lois] were turning in some of the most complex and lovely character work which we desperately tried to make entertaining and funny. Ditto Kevin and Mac and Lucy. Hello out there? There was comedy going on!

But I’ve been hideously criticized. I love the audience, I respect the audience. but I’m not writing for audience, I’m writing for me. I’m writing what I want to see those characters do. And if the audience loves it, that’s great. I’m only doing what I can do. I can’t write in response to reactions to the story. And the bloggers, I mean, with all due respect, I love the fact that people get so involved and they have this whole huge network of commentary and criticism. That’s the way it should be. But don’t expect me to write in response to it. Because I can’t. It’s physically impossible since everything is laid out so far and in advance and you don’t go shifting pieces. Or you do, but it’s at your own peril. Besides which if it’s not in my psyche, I can’t write something I’m not feeling.

Well stated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hmm, perhaps "depressing" is a little too strong of a word, but I certainly remember being emotionally affected watching that era of GH in high school, especially on dark, cold, rainy afternoons like today. I grew up in the '80s with all of the scary AIDS programs/public service announcements and we had a few family friends who contracted the virus and passed away, I had this almost irrational fear of AIDS as a child ("What about that time Lisa and I kissed in the basement!?"). Never in my life watching a TV show has my stomach sank as much as it did watching the Stone s/l, especially when he went to the eye doctor's and the Dr. said his poor vision was linked to his illness (!). And guess who needed glasses?? :rolleyes: Then Monica's woes on top of it, yeah, depending on where you were in life (for me, a teen who hated going to school every day because of a crazy work load, living with a parent battling depression) I could see how the show could really get you down. AND YET, it was so good, so intriguing, I was so swept in. That was my period of GH fandom, I haven't watched it steadily since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ahh that would be a dream these days when it was reality a decade or two ago. This was the standard for great storytelling

The 80s or the 90s?

In every genre there is always preferences. I think that is real cool. But as per that excerpt I used fromt he interview the most important thing to note about Labine's tenor is she found great CHARCATER and STORY balance. She had the comedic elements intertwined with the dramatic beats. IMO that is how you write soap, maybe the content or even writing style might be different depending on one's preference but good balance of character /plotting---- comedic and dramatic energy is necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't say I'm a fan of Labine's because I've never watched her shows- I was an NBC Daytime viewer in the 80s and have never gotten into GH, though I did watch bits & pieces from her era. Was the Bobbie/Tiffany custody battle done under her watch?

Anyway, thanks so much for such a wonderful interview with a clearly gifted writer. I enjoy reading her insights into the world of daytime and what it takes to write for it. I'm very much looking forward to Part 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've always liked Tiffany and while I love Susan Haskell, Sharon Wyatt deserved the Emmy that year AND had paid her dues. I still say that was the tightest Supporting Actress race of all-time. You had Wyatt, Haskell, Hilary Edson, Signy Coleman, and Maureen Garrett battling it out. An embarrassment of riches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who was responsible for Sean cheating on Tiffany? I disliked that story and I think that it was the Labines who then wrote them out. It was a mistake because they were a wonderful fun couple that was turned into a drama for no good reason.

As much as I loved the Labine era, I don't think that I would want her back at GH. What I really want is someone to partner with Guza to save him from his worse instincts. Someone who would flesh out stories and give the non-mob characters some airtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Part 4: http://www.welovesoa...-part_4945.html

So Labine knew that Geary disliked how she wrote Luke. Not that I care because I loved how she wrote Luke and Laura. I wasn't fond of how she wrote the Qs a lot of the time, but at least the family was alive and dynamic.

I was glad when that Karen drug story was ended so I am thankful to Claire for that one. It unfortunate that Sonny, Jason and Carly took over GH. The show would be so much better if it was balanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I appreciate your POV and ideas here. I don't, however, trust Josh Griffith to make this anything like a good story. My guess is that much of it will be off-camera and that we'll have to be happy with Mariah retelling the nightmare in bits and pieces. Meanwhile, Tessa will still be strumming her damn guitar with Daniel. Ugh. I know I'm negative about this show. I am hate watching with every fiber of my being, and there's nothing about it that's working for me. I never recall Y&R being worse.
    • A batch of photos from Episode #67 which aired Thursday June 5 in USA. Some are scene pictures, and some are behind-the-scenes. https://www.paramountpressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/beyond-the-gates/photos?episode=25710 Posting because there's a pic of director Michael V. Pomarico; and a pic of director Steven Williford whose photo caption says "J. Steven Williford".
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think the gross ickiness is Josh Griffith's intention. At birth, Ian Ward stole Mariah from Sharon, so that Sharon knew only of the Cassie twin and not the Mariah twin.  Sharon gave up Cassie for adoption at birth, never knowing that Mariah existed. When Ian Ward stole baby Mariah, he had her be raised by a woman member of his cult. She grew up in his cult. Years later, after Mariah was an adult in Genoa City and had left him, he tried to kidnap her to marry him himself, I sort of remember some icky scenes where he had arranged a wedding, but she escaped or was rescued -- it was so gross that I chose to forget it, and I don't want to look up the details. Mariah is feeling traumatized/triggered by Ian Ward being in Genoa City several months ago, because he was obsessed with her, and he terrorized her loved ones, interacted with Tessa, and drugged Sharon, which ultimately resulted in the death of Heather -- causing the grief of Daniel and Lucy. None of that was Mariah's fault. But she was so horrified by what happened, that she feels she did something wrong that caused this hateful villain to continue to obsess about her.   Based on small comments that Mariah made recently, I think she feels completely worthless. I gather that when she was away on the business trip a month or two ago, all of what happened with Ian Ward and Heather's death just hit her all at once and she was mentally/emotionally collapsing, and just felt unable to call for help.  During the business trip she sat in her hotel room and spiraled more, feeling more and more worthless and afraid. Finally she started drinking at a bar, and that's when the creepy old man approached her.  By that point, she wasn't in her right mind, and started interacting with the guy.  Either she thought he was Ian, or she thought he was someone like Ian, and she would be *required* to flirt with him in a role play, and do what he commanded, almost like old programming being reactivated.  Or perhaps just simple self-loathing playing out. I don't know if the guy actually knew Ian or Jordan, or if he was a random stranger.  But Mariah's fear/loathing/subconscious chaos kicked in. And then... well that's as far as her flashbacks have aired so far. She can't bear to face the rest of whatever it was.  I gather that in the coming episodes, we'll (eventually) find out what happened next as we see more of the icky flashbacks. --------------- The rest of this post is only my speculation: I think that she felt like she was supposed to have sex with him but didn't want to, and may have tried to kill him instead. Or he r*ped her.  Or they didn't have sex at all, but it's all convoluted in her mind.  Something horrible happened but I don't think it was her fault.  If the man died, maybe she covered it up?  I really don't know, I'm just speculating ideas. At any rate, I'm totally convinced that this is NOT a conventional "cheating storyline" where someone willingly has sex outside their relationship. ----------------- This is basically Josh Griffith's obsession with dark storylines, creepy villains, and terrible writing of "mental health issues".
    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy