Jump to content

B&B: October Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes, Brooke is hardly the innocent one...but I love her with the fire of 1,000 suns.

Taylor...not so much.

And it seems how I feel directly mirrors how Brad Bell feels. At this point, I'm fine if Taylor gets the Winsor Harmon/Lesli Kay "wallpaper" treatment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Since 'daytime whores' in my book includes males AND females... not even close by my estimation. I do think Brooke gets a bad rap because taylor is a stealth ninja-whore... she can cheat and lie but because she's great at pointing fingers, she gets everyone caught up in misdirection. Brooke has loved and at times demeaned herself for ONE man, Ridge. That's hardly whore like behavior... I can't defend the SIL boinking... and won't even try.

ATWT Emily... has slept with every man she's pretty much ever known and when that wasn't enough? She became a hooker... for kicks.

B&B... pretty much everyone, save Bridget... whores, all. Taylor gets special mention, drunk and following a man home like a stalker, sleeping with her enemy's father AND her son AND her brother, sleeping with strange MEN she didn't know... she's been BUSY! A load of strange men and THREE families? Stephen-Storm-Rick... Ridge-Thorne-(brief affair with Eric that nearly became a sexual tryst but Steph beat her there)... Ridge-Nick....YIKES!

GH... Sonny, Jason, Liz, Nik, Lucky whored himself out for drugs

DAYS... Another long list but Bo and John Black top the list for me.

YnR.... Shorter list is the list of NON-whores.

Brooke has a long way to go to reach the 'biggest whore in daytime' list in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sonny, i will give you. Maybe even Jason... But Liz has been on screen for over a decade and only been with Lucky, Jason, Zander, Ric, and Nik. She was married to two of them and had a long relationship with another one. Her only whore move to date was sleeping with Nikolas and then accepting Lucky's wedding request.

Lucky? He has been with like 5 people in 15 years. and he didnt whore himself out for drugs, he had an affair with Maxie who fed him drugs and made him addicted so she could keep sleeping with him.

and Bo? Bo Brady on Days? Who has been with Hope, Carly, and Billie. And was married to them all? Maybe one more here or there im forgetting... Hes a whore?!?!

Im sorry but save Emily Snyder on ATWT and Brooke has no competition for the biggest whore title. Both in numbers and in actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

An affair is falling for someone you shouldn't be with when you're with another person. Lucky didn't 'fall' for Maxie. He only slept with her because she kept supplying him with drugs and refused his request for help when he wouldn't sleep with her. If Lucky was a woman, fans would have already called him a 'crack whore' or the equivalent.

Liz isn't a whore? Well, now I'm back to trying to figure out why Brooke is a 'whore'. Brooke was with men she was MARRIED to, for the most part. The worst acts were the SIL boinking sessions, but outside of that she was in relationships with the men she was with through much of the show's history. Is it the number of men, even if you're married to them, or is it the quality of the relationships that makes someone a 'whore'? Passing one man's child off as another man's child has become an art form for Liz. Ah, not just Jason and Lucky, but didn't she do the same with Ric and Zander!?!? Now there's this mess with Nik. Let's hope there's not a third child to pawn off on an unsuspecting 'not-the-daddy' victim.

Turning up whenever there is a man is in emotional crisis is another Liz trait (color me shocked that she didn't sleep with Patrick while Robin was away - she must have been off her game, or maybe the writers were even bored by having her 'give comfort' to another emotional wreck). Has Liz ever been faithful? She's been emotionally unfaithful to Lucky for so long that by the time she was sexually unfaithful, it was hardly a surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its a combo of the acts and the number. brooke is a whore for every reason you listed Taylor as one. She has a high volume of men shes been with, most of them have been affairs, and most of them have been related. then there is all the son in law screwing she did for sport. shes a whore.

i never said lucky feel for maxie, i said maxie fed him drugs and amde him an addict so she could have him.

and liz has had whore moves over the years, as i said, but as a whole i dont find her to be a whore (and if i did id admit to it, i love most whores on tv shows. lol). the ric/zander thing was different. she slept with zander after leaving ric because he was psycho and then, i think but am not 100% sure, ric knew and wnated to rasise the baby as his own or some [!@#$%^&*] like that. and with jason and lucky, again she slept with jason after leaving lucky and yes she let lucky think the kid was his, its a selfish stupid move, but she came clean with him. its not like lucky thinks he the father of cam and jake and isnt, he knows.

brooke is such a freakin whore tho. just like taylor is. thats the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

yeah, wow. The whore word. :wacko:

Sorry, I just do not think Brooke is any less "ho"-ie (trying to compromise here -- the w word is up there with the c word for me) than any other female lead on the soaps. I can't go there with Brooke -- maybe because I like her but also because I honestly believe she is more sinned against than sinning.

She was in love with Ridge -- still is, though lawd knows I can't deal with their junior high woh-mance. He was her first! She married Eric when Ridge started his new life with Caroline. She was lonely, so was Eric, they mistook great affection for love and tied the knot.

Later, when she fell for Thorne (which I loved!), I saw it as this long-standing friendship (they were pals in the early days, back when Clayton Thorcross was playing Thorne) which suddenly bloomed into love without them even realizing it and even when they were busy trying to keep apart their respective love interests (Ridge and Taylor). It was a great, soapy romance which was inexplicably broken up by Brad Bell who wanted to tap the potential drama of a mother-daughter triangle. Breacon had some great short-term fireworks but it ruined Brooke and, for me, was totally out-of-place for a woman who up until that point had been devoted to her children and would never have hurt them. Even Stephanie up until then could not fault Brooke's role as a mother.

Ever since Breacon, the show has essentially been written by the seat of its pants with Bell throwing one plot point after another at us. So whenever Brooke is touted as ending up with somebody else (like Nick), I put it down to Jack wagner wanting to hitch his wagon to the female lead of the show and Bell humoring him. Another great potential pairing ruined by zigzag plotting of the worst kind.

Long story short: Brooke may be misguided, may get sex confused with love, may even have a few brain cells missing when it comes to a man (i.e.: Ridge). But she ain't no ho. She certainly has never seduced anybody for cash or power. Only out of love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Your analysis is on point, and I agree with it. Except...

...back in 1987, when starry-eyed Logan first catered for the Forresters (yup, poor girl in a rich house), the attraction to Ridge was made up of lots of components. His look and sex appeal was part of it. But his cash and power were part of it. Over time, as money became less of an issue for Brooke, I agree that it did not really motivate her in her romantic choices (although, I do still wonder about whether Eric's money and the ability to screw over Stephanie was part of the reason she got with Eric). But we cannot ignore that cash and power have been part of her foundation in being attracted to these Forresters. Humble roots... Father abandonment... These are the seeds of the Brooke we know now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The way I saw it at the time was a young Brooke (in college) crushing on this dazzling Prince Charming. And Prince Charming has all the attributes: good looks and a castle. I didn't see her as being a gold-digger who didn't care who her mark was, as long as he had wealth. Everything about Ridge overwelmed her: the megawatt smile, the tux, the rockstar-designer rep. I never for once thought the money was anything other than a bonus. It was Ridge's sparkling charisma (!) that swept her off her feet.

With Eric... I can see how toying with Stephanie may have been the cherry on top. But I really think she saw Eric as this lonely man who had never really loved his wife. And since she was lonely, too -- with huge daddy issues, as you say -- she thought he could make her forget her heartache and they could build an exciting new life. Undoubtedly, she was attracted by what he could offer her at FC, too, but thanks to her BeLieF formula, he ended up needing her (for business purposes) even more than she needed him. I honestly do not think she married him just to get 51% of Forrester Creations! That was all him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

THANK YOU, Cat! For the entire post. I gave up thinking that the 'whore' word would ever go away. Now? I I just make sure that if I have to have that fight, the guys get included, too. I don't know why any of the women of daytime are labeled because NONE of them are as bad as daytime males.

Genetic variation in (Oakdale/Port Chuckles/Llanview) is dead thanks to (John Dixon-Holden Snyder/Sonny Corinthos/Todd Manning) -- and still the women get hit heavy... not ALL women, either... some women are 'excused' even others with the same history or worse, are pure evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You lost me at "charisma (!)", LOL. For me, it only worked if I thought she thought he was rich, sexy, etc...but that rich was a big part of the story. Nonetheless, we agree. She has not been pursuing men for their wallets (or their prestige).

I believe the new term is "man-whore".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL, Mark... I've given up that term too (though, I am still a Deuce Bigalow fan... I shouldn't admit that according to my sister, who is not a man-whore fan. Hey, it happens). I think whore works as a unisex term, if it has to be used at all... No offense to your gender, my friend, but how many men in daytime aren't 'whore-aas'? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL, can't let down Brooke, even when the writing for her bites me in the ass, Norrth. I've been fighting that Brookie fight for far too long.

Seriously, we need to do a post on man-hos (I guess I should start being equal opportunity when it comes to lobbing the w insult at the boys). Uh, Ridge used to stick it in anything that moved. But I'm going to put that down to "Little Ridge" being the only brain functionning in the whole package. I won't even touch Sailor Nick (and neither should you if you don't want to catch anything). A woman in every port? Perhaps not, but he has certainly had women in every Forrester hallway. I am waiting for Nick to give poor, sick notBeth the 5 minutesnight of her life, thereby magically restoring her mental and physical health.

And don't get me started on Sonny Corinthos. Man-Boobs needs to give up the mob and start cruising the sidewalk and doling out tricks. The power of those dimples and that, uh, stutter would seemingly pull in more lucrative $$$ than all that messy mafia work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Poor Taylor cut out of her own beach house memorial. I really hope Katie gets to redecorate and has some taste unlike the previous owners.

They could have a Cabin memorial that lasts an entire week and re-show some fantastic clips.

If the Forrester's are so poor isn't it time that Brooke return to the lab and do what she does best, chemistry? I would like to see Brooke and Ridge having to sell their house and move in with Eric and Donna. Then when they are financially stable again, Ridge can buy it back for her!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy