Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

You're probably right, but then he had some bad blood with GL too so I guess anywhere might have been dicey. 

I would have appreciated seeing what he did at AW, if he'd had better luck than Malone did when he tried to headwrite. I guess we would just have to put ourselves in a world where executives still let writers have some freedom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I feel like P&G would have allowed Douglas Marland at least SOME creative latitude, if only because ATWT was still often ranking as high as #2 before his death.  But, as you've said, @DRW50, the entire daytime landscape was changing at that time, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Depending on what year Marland might have moved over to AW -- I'm fairly certain he would have strengthened the Cory family by making sure all of Mac's and Rachel's children were on the canvas (including Jamie, Iris, and Sandy); he would have reestablished the Matthews family as the core middle-class group -- probably starting with Russ (with a new wife and a few of his new off-spring) and Liz, later followed by Pat and her off-spring ; and he likely would have used a more focused version of the Frames or Perrinis as a working-class family.  Or perhaps Marland would have created a completely new working class-family. Who knows?  But it is certainly fun to speculate.   

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I went back and listened to Barbara Crampton's interview with Locher and she said that she was asked to audition for Mindy. She refused. Later, JFP called her up and offered her the role. Reading between the lines of what she did and did not say: it did not seem like a very happy time for her. She also did not seem to know much about GL in general as she thought it was still on the air as of the time the interview happened (2 yrs ago).

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, yikes. Honestly, while I don't dislike Crampton, she just never fit in to the Lewis family. GL would've been better off sticking with Hamilton through the climax with Eve, then take the time to recast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I don't think I've ever seen an interview with a performer who was so detached from the character, the cast and the show she was a part of. It felt like Locher had to prompt her to remind her of details and then remind her that GL was not still on the air. She was clearer about her time on DAYS where she was only on for a year according to her. It was very obvious she had no affection at all for her time on Guiding Light even if she were too graceful to be direct about it.

She also thinks she was on for three years, but everything I've seen says she was on for two. Maybe she felt like it was three?

Edited by chrisml
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh god no.  AW was pretty decent in the late 80s and early 90s and I just don't think that show would have been a good fit for his often earnest and idealistic vision.  He tended to have trouble writing grey characters and that soap has so many grey characters.

I would have preferred to see him create his own 30 minute soap that he was developing and see what that would look like.

I'm glad he opted not to come back to GL after he threw his tantrum and quit in mid 1982... because he wasn't a good fit on that soap either.  He was basically coasting off the momentum provided by the far superior Dobsons.   The Dobsons I wish had ended up at AW after Santa Barbara had been axed because they would have had a field day writing Rachel, Paulina, Felicia, Donna, Iris, etc.

I think the only reason she did remember GL at all was because it exposed her to Horror movie conventions.   

She had it rough because she came in near the end of the Eva stalking Mindy story so that even though she had a right to be on guard with Eve and later Alex... because she hadn't played the early beats of the story.. viewers had trouble siding with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I vaguely remember the beginning of this. I think I was so annoyed by the writers turning Eve into another of JFP's desperate man hungry loonies that I didn't watch. I don't think I watched any of Crampton's tenure as Mindy so I have no opinion of her work. If I did see her as Mindy, my memory is as bad as hers. I have more memory of Hamilton's work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That particular period of GL - the Jennifer Richards trial - was very different from Marland's '82 GL.   You could feel Harding Lemay's touch as '81 GL is very much like Lemay's AW.  Lemay was part of the writing team during this period.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • The funeral was not onscreen - only the Brooks returning home after the service. Not aware of any available clips.
    • Very very well said!!! 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I would only add that Sam Ratcliff is frequently named in regards to certain AW comedic turns.  And, we know from Carolyn Culliton (tweet 2024) that Sam & Gary put their heads together & came up with that gorilla.  
    • I knew you would be so excited seeing your girl Brookey as #1!!!! She also WINS as to Frequently Married!!!  
    • Yes, Stacy does this both for early DAYS & early GH. I have written some for her, for DAYS. But just one tiny point & that is that she only deals with DVDs. I realize that is not the point of your posting but it seemed the right thing to clarify. I know that you know that video tapes is past, not present.
    • Hahahha I think sleeping with almost all of your daughters's boyfriends and husbands and getting pregnant... definitely gives Brooke the right to top 1 place. Long live the whore of Beverly hills.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • CurlyQGrl has DVDs of some episodes, that they can sell, but that doesn't matter. What is helpful: they describe the scenes on the tapes, so you can read that as recaps without ordering anything. Doesn't really give storylines, though, which is what you asked for.  Here's the links anyhow. full menu https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/menu.html GH page https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/gh/menu.html GH 1960s https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/gh/eps/gheps1960s.htm
    • I would argue that Another World never played "everything" for laughs. Even when there were comedic scenes in some storylines there were other storylines that were not intended as comedy.  You give 1988 as the end point, and Mary was on the canvas from August 1986 to February 1989, so she must have overlapped with the despised laughs you are referring to at least half of the time she was there. I honestly can't recall any real comedy that Mary would have been part of. I don't think she was lighthearted about choosing between two husbands, MJ's prostitution, Kathleen's death, or even her son Scott dating her daughter Cheryl.  I would have said that the amount of comedy depended on the head writer and there was more comedy under Richard Culliton and Gary Tomlin in 1984 than subsequent headwriters. I guess there was an outbreak of more comedy when Cecile kidnapped Cass from his wedding in 1986, but in general the Sin Stalker wasn't presented as funny, Mitch's return wasn't funny, John's arrival wasn't funny, Reginald wasn't funny. The tone was serious even if the plots verged on the ludicrous. And maybe that's what you mean -- but I would make a distinction between intentional comedy and storylines I can't take seriously for other reasons. 
    • I'm excited for us to get back to a full weeks worth of episodes and also us beginning to move into the episodes filmed once the show premiered. We're already starting to see changes in the lighting and the way certain characters are styled. Of course we know this week we have our first recast as well. After the big Eva reveal, I hope the show continues to move into a positive direction and that we see them starting to fix some of the things we've all had issues with.
    • It seems like they may have been going in one direction for Andre and then changed their mind. He had this player/bachelor thing going at first where he was messing with Dani, seemed to be feeling Eva, and then somehow smitten by bland Ashley of all people. I feel like Ashley was supposed to be the one that finally made him want to be with someone and settle. The way he talked her up in those earlier episodes was really confusing. The wonderful, amazing nurse Ashley and conveniently she's unattainable because she has a partner, but he can't stop thinking of her and takes these busted pics of her. It was a mess. However, it all seems to have been dropped. I honestly feel like Andre can go. That may be an unpopular opinion but I don't need his breathy final syllable to be content with BTG. It's always like "There's gotta be another wh-ahyy"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy