Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Unspeakably (her OLTL character was somehow even worse). And both their stories with Gus just prior to his death were uncomfortable and skeevy to me, first from a weird Mormon fundie POV (the whole Natalia mess with her kid) and then Olivia's weird obsession with him. And I was someone with very little time for Gus to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Count me in as loathing Olivia, almost from minute one. There is something about CC's acting choices that is just unlikeable. Olivia wasn't a "love to hate" bitch either. I never understood why they kept her past the initial San Cristobal crap. To cycle through families of men? They should've sent her on a train out of town when she knocked Billy off the wagon. 

And the Olivia/Natalia relationship was more about trying to latch on to the Luke/Noah buzz than anything else. Ugh...don't get me started on that. The only reason to go over that story dialogue line by line is to make sure you're not offending anyone...but you just wrote two cousins getting it on? HUGE EYEROLL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Putting aside the ugly preamble with Gus between them, it was a very weird religious/Mormon take on lesbians to me. Their entire relationship was centered around this cloistered life where they each orbited first Gus, then the alleged suburban dad ideal of Frank Cooper(!!). In the end Natalia(?) had another child by him, once again venerating heterosexual parenthood and homemaking above all else while the two women remained weirdly chaste and retiring onscreen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re:Wheeler and Hurst. A 70 year old legacy show is crumbling down around you and (allegedly - you can NEVER trust what that person says) and they are going over word for word the disastrous Olivia and Natalia scenes???? Really? That’s your focus while GL dies around you? It can never be said enough that thank God Wheeler and Hurst never worked again in daytime. It’s criminal what they did to kill GL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was more than just Luke/Noah. This was a whole period of time, which still goes on today to a degree (the British soaps keep trying to force straight women into lesbian relationships over and over) where the soaps were trying to tap into an lgbt audience.

I think it may have been less about offending anyone and more about censors. I don't have a problem believing censors would object more to a lesbian relationship than straight cousin incest. 

The oddest part for me was when they had a big chunk of an episode revolving around the women going vibrator shopping...all while making sure to never say vibrator.

That character was so slimy to begin with, so to me the issue was more the story seemed to go into "cry rape" territory until someone at the network got squeamish and he was killed off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, Otalia had zero to do with Nuke. I'm chuckling that anyone had this thought, which is total news to me. 

Nuke, BTW, was Bianca with guys - literally. ATWT went to someone who wrote on the Bianca coming out storyline & asked her if she could do it again, only with guys!!! Obviously she could - and did. 

Anyway, for 2 women, adults, of an age, who had been with men their whole lives to turn to each other was WAY MORE THREATENING than any other story they could've come up with. But, Wheeler made a mistake thinking they could do it so chaste. 

And why not chase the lgbtq+ audience?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have accepted ridiculous storylines if the chemistry is right and the acting works so the idea of Olivia and Natalia getting together didn't bother me. It was the execution of it that was weird to me. It now makes sense that they were going over ever single line as it felt very safe and devoid of any real human feelings. It reminded me a bit of of Nick and Ann Hamilton's NuMindy where it was two actors who felt as if they were on two different shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know it's been so many years already, but I'm still heartbroken by the promise of the early months of the Conboy tenure with Taggart/Culliton. The writing was crisper, took some actual risk with more character driven scenes. The drab brightness and pastel colors were gone and Conboy had the show looking so much nicer already. If Taggart had been allowed to stay and do her thing, it may not have led to a glory period, but maybe a more longterm period of respectability was possible. 

 

Instead, Taggart was fired, Weston was hired, Holly immediately moved to recurring and the bottom fell out. I still wonder what could have been. 

Maybe this sounds picky, but I felt like I could have accepted more of the Peapack years and it's growing pains if only they would have never fired their music department and hired Gabrielle Solarino to basically provide elevator muzak for the show and ill-timed licensed music. Pointing to 2 examples off the top of my head.

 

I remember really being engaged with Justin Deas' performance when Coop died. It was the first not phoned in performance I had seen from him in years and it was completely interrupted by "Downtown" coming on and pulling me out of the scene. It really called for a great somber cue, and they botched it. 

 

And last was the finale. I made it through almost the entire episode not shedding a tear. But when Josh and Reva's last music cue came on? That's what did it. Not the love can save the world crap. None of the Dawson's Creek-lite nonsense they had going on. An actual classic soap cue that pulled back the years on me and reminded me how long I had been invested in this show. (Not nearly as long as some of the posters here, but still). 

 

I really think I could have tolerated more if they had just fixed that one element. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have had an epiphany. I have FINALLY realized why it is that I cannot discuss the end of GL with y'all without getting into a massive bad mood. Most of you have so much blame for one Person & overlook 2 other persons - Conboy & Weston - who should be getting a heaping helping of blame. But then I come to what I think has the ultimate responsibility and blame & who might that be? P&G you fools! They were the ones who did not provide the needed budget and the ones who chose to put a totally inexperienced EP into a position where she was going to be in over her head from the first week, on. Now, I feel so much better. Rant over, BTW. It's safe to come out again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True. P&G wanted out of the soap Business and that’s why 1 year later Atwt followed. I mean If that Big House ain’t behind your Show and providing Budget, Vision etc. How are they to make it. Writting is one Thing and the cast another but they tried. They had to work with like nothing lol I will always give them Credit for making the show til the last Episode even under those circumstances. 

i mean what were the actual glory days. Coz i hear nothing but complaining about the 80‘s/90‘s/00‘s. Even some 70‘s got criticized. To me it Looks Like The Last 30 Years were garbage to the majority of GL fans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can only offer my opinion (for what it's worth) but I think the 30s-60s were the glory days for GL. However, I would say that the 70s were great and I found a lot to like in the 80s and 90s. While it wasn't GL at its best, I wouldn't classify the whole decades of the 80s and 90s to be garbage, although a lot that went on during those decades I WOULD classify as garbage. The 00s, however, is a different story. I struggle to find any redeeming qualities of that last decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow! When you decide to say a thing, you don't mess around. You really say it. I tip my hat to you, especially liking your Big House analogy. Roger Newcomb said something about GL's end that I have long been fond of,

Roger Newcomb: Crystal Chappell proved on GUIDING LIGHT in its last two years that it doesn't have to matter what sized set you're using, what type of camera you're using, how good the lighting is, how much time you have to prepare or any of that stuff. She made every single scene work. She gave some individual performances that rank right up with the very best daytime has ever seen.

I happen to agree about SOME that we all know was garbage. San Crapoblah, I am looking at you. 

However on the end times, I can only say I respect you & your opinion, even as I disagree. For just one example, I firmly believe that GL deserved the Emmy for Tammy's death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
    • At this point Y&R's next step is to go fully green screen and have the actors Zoom from home.
    • I was just taking about this in the Y&R thread - they desperately need better studio space. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy