Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Where is the evidence that Beverlee loathed JFP? Beverlee loathed working. She expressed the same overworked issues at AW and Texas long before having the same overworked issues at GL. Scott McKinsey is a good friend of JFP to this day. I doubt he’d be a friend of someone his mother loathed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Unpopular opinion, but I supported Billy being told about Mindy's affair with Roger.  Maybe Alex shouldn't have been the person to tell him, but it needed to be revealed because Mindy took delight in sleeping with Roger and being disrespectful to Alex during the early months of the affair.

Had Mindy did the logical thing and kept her distance from Nick.. then none of that would have happen.  She only had herself to blame.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I happen to agree. Some people do not know the first thing about the way people live their lives. Scott McKinsey would & I'm sure does pick his friends on his own values & different circumstances. A grown man would not decide who not to be friends with based on his deceased mother's opinions. Even if said mother is the much beloved Beverlee McKinsey.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I understand---but (for lack of a better word) Alex could be extremely "hard" when it came to family. Alex really had no love for Billy, but even if she had, she would've still done anything she deemed necessary to protect a Spaulding (or the Spaulding business). I didn't feel that changed. Her actions were simply more extreme because she had found Lujack's twin. (sometimes I don't think she even saw Nick as his own person.)

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the writers were morphing Alex into BM's previous character, Iris.  By making Alex more neurotic toward the men in her life -- sons, husbands, love interests, etc., and using those neurosis as her main motivations.  BM may have felt that Alex was becoming as difficult to play as Iris had been on Another World. And this would have been more challenging to sustain for the actress.    Just my opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally I've seen nothing to suggest a confusion between Alexandra & Iris. Do you have anything to back up this idea? Unless there was a situation where writers from AW were then writing for GL but without knowing that happened I fail to see anything going on besides what Beverlee herself said was. Do you? I guess that's my bottom line. We know what she said, why are we looking for something else? What she said explains and it does so quite clearly. Also there's no reason to doubt her word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not doubting her word. I'm just expressing my personal opinion about the writing at the time.  The only "evidence" I have to back it up is the writing, which I do believe was pushing Alex in the direction of being a neurotically motivated woman -- which Alex had not been in the past -- even during her most morally ambiguous moments.  Jeeze-Louise, must you misunderstand everything??  Even when I openly say, it is "just my opinion", that's not good enough. An opinion is just an opinion.  Nothing says you are obligated to accept or agree with it. I feel as if I have to walk on egg shells, carefully monitoring every word I type to avoid setting you off.  I don't mind if people disagree with me or my opinions, but I don't state everything as fact -- I state it as my personal opinion.   Please don't attack people just because you don't share (or perhaps understand) their opinions.  My opinion only.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I definitely do not misunderstand everything. There was no doubt in my mind that you were expressing your opinion, an opinion I more often than not admire. I made no attack of you. I disagreed with you & tried to inquire if you knew something about the writers that would shed light on this. I'm very sorry you felt misunderstood, which is exactly the way I feel right now. At any rate, since you took what I said totally differently than what I was thinking, just try to ignore this & move on & I will do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get what your saying, JFP and the writers did move Alex to be more neurotic...but it always has been there since Lujack's death..she took Flock of Seagulls guy into her home and business on his word he was Brandon's kid to replace Alan and her son. I do think that this was also evident in her marrying Roger...(which was a plot point, Long's original creation of Alex would have shown him to the door..) But again, JFP double down on that...and then when Marj came...hoo-boy, Alex became a neurotic screaming shrew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, you can make the case that Alexandra was always pretty much a "hard" person, sure with family where she clearly had certain expectations (often not met), but also with other non-family members sometimes, too. She is one where I would say definitely she did not suffer fools AT ALL!! I know the expression is about not suffering fools gladly which does not represent her well enough. LOL. But, I would also say that this was a trait in her that I liked, as opposed to holding it against her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Random question - why does Fletcher's son, Ben, have a thick accent?  I can't tell yet if it's Boston or New York, but it's thick.  Is that from his mother's side?

ETA - this is the 1995 version of Ben, he's a young teenager.

Edited by alwaysAMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Beverlee McKinsey has been dead for ages. None of us know her mind. What we do know is on the record, most notably her historic dragging of JFP which has lived in infamy for decades. I highly doubt McKinsey regretted a word of what she said about JFP or how it was taken.

As for people's opinions of Alex v. Iris, those subjective takes are valid and don't need to be cleared with anyone else.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Beverlee McKinsey was an Okie, like I am an Okie.  Okies say what they mean and mean what they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It's obvious that Israel's presence is a major divisive issue, and this is something that the EBU needs to deal with. According to the now published results Israel got 13 out of a possible 19 max points in the semi-final, and while their song isn't bad there's no way they would get those numbers without some kind of manipulation/political voting. They are clearly using this contest as a way of improving their somewhat tarnished reputation. I know that some people are comparing this to the massive sympathy votes that Ukraine gets and which propelled them to victory in 2022, but I feel that that was a more genuine show of support than this concerted effort from Israel to influence the televoting. I even had an ad on Youtube from Israel in Swedish(!) asking for votes! It might not be against any rules, but it feels a bit icky nonetheless.
    • Yeah, as you wrote, an Israeli win would have been a political disaster. Congratulations to Austria. 0 points from the televoting to Switzerland was a disgrace. Other than that, I really enjoyed the show ... but I'm also glad that Eurovision season is over 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Full results: Recap of the Grand Final:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hahaha Sorry if I was too negative, I just started typing and typing once I got going hahaha
    • @dc11786 Thanks for taking time to answer my various questions, along with giving your thoughts on the different writing teams. I wonder why they didn't just have Ryder and TR leave together if Jane was going anyway. The discussions over the last few pages have made me more interested in watching these episodes than I have been over the years - without the extra details and analyses provided, these years can be difficult to decipher (not helped by how often Jo seems like a side character).
    • I didn't think this was very good (I've never yet seen a good episode of this revival), but you do get a lot of Michael Stroka. And if you are a Donna Reed Show fan, you also get Paul Petersen.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A very rare, fascinating look at camera blocking in a 1980 episode. Very loose, almost startlingly so (who expects to see Will Vernon with a cig dangling out of his mouth?). @vetsoapfan There's some Jacquie Courtney content in the back half of the video.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Barbara Stock shares memories of her time on Dallas, including that Ken Kercheval was the only cast member she knew outside of the show and that she did not actually realize she was being written out. https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/29593/barbara-stock-spenser-for-hire-dallas-chips-spinoff-doing-know/
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  I concur that this isn't the most interesting material, but I do wish I could see how JoBeth Williams played those trial moments.
    • If I remember correctly, they were interrupted before Nicole could reveal what the third thing was. I remember feeling like it was an intentional interruption, too. 
    • 1976 Pt 5 Joanne’s hopes are raised when Jack seems to respond to the new woman she’s become. She wore a new dress and had a lovely dinner with wine, and when Jack drank more than he was used to having, he reached for her. Her happiness is dimmed when he calls her Peggy, but she says nothing. The next morning, when Jack can remember nothing, she tells him they made love. When Peggy later tells Joanne she’s going to have to stop helping her make herself over as it’s becoming too painful, Joanne angrily lashes back that Peggy might just as well back off, because Jack made love to her last night. Peggy, angry and hurt, asks Jack if it’s true. Realizing that Joanne told Peggy to hurt her, he tells Peg he’s going to ask Joanne for a divorce now. But Peggy is still guilt-ridden over Joanne and, fearing she can’t handle it yet, tells Jack about Joanne’s suicide attempt. Jack, horrified, goes home to see Joanne, who soon realizes that Peggy must have told him about the pills. She assures Jack that she knows life is too precious to ever do that again. Once Jack is satisfied that she really means it, he returns to us Peggy. But Peggy is close to breaking from the guilt and tension she’s living with, and tells Jack that if he’s ever free, they can decide then. Needing a fresh perspective, Peggy takes Chris up on her offer that Peggy spend the night with her, as Snapper won’t be home.  Chris, meanwhile, has been spending her free time preparing Nancy’s apartment for her homecoming. Expressing appreciation for everything she’s done, Ron has offered to make her a table similar to one he’s made for Nancy. Chris has thanked him and has given him her address so he can deliver it. Stuart, wondering why Ron can’t seem to get another job despite the leads he’s been given, checks him out and learns he was in prison for burglary but there was also’ a rape charge, which was dropped. Chris asks Nancy, who explains that before their marriage Ron picked up a woman in a bar. She took him to her apartment and began to seduce him but then screamed rape. He had taken nothing, Nancy adds, but was told he’d rot in prison if he didn’t plead guilty to burglary. No one  told him that the woman had declined to testify. Nancy was the only one who believed him, and she with him against her family’s wishes. Ron walks in at the end of the conversation and informs Chris that he tried to deliver her table but  finally realized he was looking for the wrong address. When Chris later returns to her apartment, she finds Peggy whimpering on the floor in the dark. Slowly Chris gets the story from Peg: The lights wouldn’t -work when she arrived, and she was grabbed from behind, thrown to the floor, and raped. Chris convinces Peggy that the police must be called and manages to protect Peggy from brutal questioning by insisting upon an officer trained in dealing with rape victims. After Peggy is taken to the hospital, the investigator, Miss Weston, asks Chris who might have  known Peg was there—or might want to rape Chris herself. After thinking this over, Chris tells her about Ron. Jack has been trying to reach Peggy. Lashing out from his own pain, Stuart brutally tells him that she’s been raped and he is partially to blame, as she went to Chris’s to get away from her problem—him. Jack is shattered. Instinctively knowing that Ron is guilty, Chris confronts him. But Ron sticks to his story of looking for a wrong address and, under pressure from Chris, finally offers to be in a lineup. Brock tells his mother that Jill wants to visit Phillip’s grave. Kay replies it will be “a cold day in hell” before. She does. But when Jill asks Kay if she would put some flowers on the grave for her and her baby, Kay, touched, breaks down and asks Jill to go with her. Liz, knowing that Kay spends too much time alone, virtually forces her to accept an invitation for dinner and then invites Ralph Olsen, a plumber who is a widower. Kay is aloof at first -they apparently have nothing in common—but when Ralph turns out to be a former alcoholic, the ice is broken. Ralph offers to help Kay with her drinking problem, and she soon finds she likes him very much. Liz becomes concerned with Kay’s assumption that her friendship with Ralph is heading for much more and tries to warn Kay that. Ralph is not the marrying kind. She tries to head Kay off when she makes plans for a “love nest,” but Kay persists and attempts to seduce Ralph at her pool. He evades her passes and asks her if they can’t just slow things down. But Kay is undaunted, and since he isn’t proposing, she does so herself. Ralph, who has told Bill that Kay’s money stands in‘ their way, gently turns her down, explaining that she would need to change him and they wouldn’t be happy. Humiliated and hurt, Kay starts drinking again.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy