Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes discussion, week of September 21


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Writers kill off characters when they don't know anything else to do. It's easy, gives a few weeks of story. Sometimes it makes sense, evil characters needs punishing, whatever, but generally it's just lazy storytelling, especially when they kill off a core character for no good reason. Y&R is a mess right now. It has no story direction. The actors for the most part are saving this show's butt with their individual performances. heck, Beth Maitland is saving this whole storyline. Her emotion is the only one I believe. The rest of the characters are so damaged. And Paul Rauch in his interview with NB thinks everything is cooking on all cylinders on this show. No wonder it's in trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 308
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Agreed.

It seems every time someone writing or producing this is interviewed, they refuse to acknowledge any mistake. It's like they're living in denial about the true state of the show and about their obvious lack of soap opera writing skills.

I get it, they can't come out and say their show sucks, but these people tout their horns more than anything else and want so badly to persuade everyone that Y&R is as good as ever and better than it has ever been, when it's not to a lot of people, and clearly, whatever ratings momentum they had earlier in the year has LONG died down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And MAB said the show was dark when LML was writing it?! That is a laugh now. Seeing just how many characters have been killed off is shocking. I knew it was a lengthy list, but I didn't know it was that bad. If I were the EP (of the entire show, not just production) I'd tell the writers straight out YOU CANNOT KILL ANYONE OFF FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR. Then I'd even given them several characters who need to be written off and see what they do. Everyone doesn't have to die! Not only do they not follow through, but it's hard to care when it happens so often. I think the best exit in soap history is when Alison Mackenzie simply walked out of Peyton Place and never returned. It was suspenseful, they built up to it for over a year, gave the cast wonderful material to work with and it showed the consequences of living in a soap town. Alison was a character who looked at her life and said "This [!@#$%^&*] is crazy!" She didn't ignore that all these crazy things kept happening to her. It affected her so much that she almost lost her sanity which is why she HAD to leave Peyton Place. And that show wasn't nearly as dark as Y&R is now! If Alison were on Y&R, she'd commit suicide by now!

I want someone (perhaps Ashley?) to look at all this darkness and insanity and truly react to it. Peoples lives need to be shaken to the core and they need to do whatever it takes to move forward. Of course that will never happen because we know Adam and Patty aren't going anywhere. Despite murdering a child, they'll eventually redeem Adam. Or maybe just never reveal his crimes so he'll keep committing them. Then you have sweet, crazy, cute Patty whose sins will be washed away soon enough. Colleen who? There is no light at the end of the tunnel, just more darkness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Chris B, they can't have anyone react to the death, because then they would have to acknowledge the tragedy and the consequences of death. It's much easier to have a few episodes of sad faces, followed by everyone forgetting a week or two later. Or to have death used as an excuse for living characters to do whatever they want and to blame that on the dead.

Y&R is VERY clever with who they choose to kill off, just as they are clever with who they fire or minimize in airtime. They know that the soap press and some fans will ALWAYS find a way to blame the actor. Lauren reduced to the most worthless role she has had in decades? Well, it's OK, because she's one of the Fisher-Baldwins, she gets what she deserves. Jill and Nikki ruined? It's OK, MTS and Jess should just accept what they can. Phillip's return a massive failure? Thom Bierdz is to blame. The Adam story a confusing mess? That's Chris Engen's fault. Brad killed off? Well, LML used Brad too much, and Don Diamont should have accepted a pay cut, so who cares?

Now we have Colleen. Over and over, at Deep Soap, Serial Drama, wherever, I read comments to the effect of, "Colleen died when the gorgeous and talented superstar Adrianne Leon left. She was brain dead as soon as Tammin arrived."

So to some of the vocal viewers, it's OK to kill Colleen, because AL was fired.

Can you imagine if Y&R had killed off Jack after Terry Lester left, or Jill after Brenda Dickson was fired? And would fans have said no big deal?

The show will continue to find a way to make sure the actors get the blame for bad stories or bad, pointless exits, and sadly, I don't see this changing anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks Alvin. I was just very confused by today's episode. It seemed completely off to focus on the Scoobies GH style wacky hijinks when Colleen and Victor are in critical condition. Why was Jill at a party when Billy needed her? Did anyone even mention Colleen and Victor today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You'd think Jill would want to be there...she is an Abbott. Katherine is also John's best friend so why aren't they there? Both were so closely tied to that family since they arrived in Genoa City. Especially Jill due to John, Billy and Jack. Maybe she didn't have gas money, who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OK, at least that makes some sense, even if any kind of party at the Chancellors doesn't, Kaye's speech not withstanding.

I wonder what they are going for with Chance/Chloe. Is Chloe going to accidentally fall for him? Or is the idea that Billy really does love Chloe he just hasn't quite figured it out yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Congratulations to Carlos Alcaraz on his second win at the French Open!

      Please register in order to view this content

        If the standard of play in the women's final yesterday wasn't of the highest caliber, that is not something you could say about today's final. It was absolutely fantastic tennis. 
    • When Barbara's letter was read (partly in Barbara's voice), there was commenting upthread that Barbara's voice is similar to the voice of Naomi's unhoused client June.  It did sound like her.  June is played by Jasmine Burke.  Per closing credits, Barbara was voiced by Sherita Bolden.  Still possible that they are connected. From our discussion on the May thread:  Looks and/or voices similar between June, Haley, and Tracy.   Tracy looks like Debbi Morgan. LOL so June might be connected to Haley, Tracy, or Barbara; and/or Samantha&Tyrell. I love that we don't know!
    • In the 1987 episodes, Mary has wonderful conversations with MJ and Cheryl. This is a realistic family with believable dynamics. Mary's ambivalence towards Vince is played nicely. Denise Alexander is so good here. I don't know what happened that the writers or producers just decided to chuck it all away. I don't FF these scenes. The show had a strong family that could have had years of storyline and they did nothing with them. I really don't get it. 
    • I can't speak for Sonni, but I thought Annie came off as neurotic from very early on. That's just how Cynthia Watros plays her parts, and the writing went along. I don't think Claire was mentally ill - they claimed she had a brain tumor, didn't they? I am never sure just why they made the effort given that she was leaving anyway. 
    • @DeeVee Claire is a perfect example. So many women came to Springfield as competent, smart, and talented professionals. Then they’d attract a so-called “good guy,” get dumped, and spiral into complete chaos. What always strikes me is how clearly it plays like a male fantasy—yet it was written and sold to a female audience.  I'm not a content expert, but I don't think cis gendered women fantasize about losing control of their mental faculties in response to an orgasm. Similar to Holly's story, it seems repulsive, because I don't believe women fantasize about becoming more vulnerable and appealing to men after they've been assaulted.
    • I just watched some parts of an episode of GL where Roger has just been shot by Holly. Rita then admits to Hillary that Roger raped her. Kasdorf is such a fantastic actress. I wish there were more of her work available. 
    • -- Alex Alegria has almost a full sleeve tattoo on one arm and a large tatt on one pec. I see no indication that the show is covering up his ink,
    • Didn't Carrie2 even seduce a minor? Ick. Oh, yeah, and she even tried to seduce Alan, but this was his post-prison era when he was trying to prove to everyone he had changed. It's funny that of all people he didn't go for it. Wait. Josh had an affair with Vanessa? Or she just thought he did? I know people always say "it's just a soap" but the way mental illness is portrayed on soaps (and that goes for pretty much all of them) has always been not great, especially PPD. They practically turned Claire into The Joker. She also was trying to seduce men. (I notice that now Mary Ryan Munisteri is listed as co HW with Ryder in the 1986 episodes, Claire has calmed down a lot. Never thought her GL career was very good but seems like she tried to course correct that a bit).
    • sss Ms. Tunie is a goddess. I feel all the anger, pride, sadness, arrogance, dignity, fear, love, and other emotions in everything she does as Anita.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy