Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes discussion., Week of June 29,2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Sharon deliberately lying to Jack about the baby's paternity is cruel. I don't have a dog in the Phyllis v Sharon debate but even from my perspective, what they have done with Sharon so far is awful and if a future baby switch evolves from this it will do nothing to redeem this character. I actually liked the progress they showed with Sharon and with Phyllis but what's the point if they are going to sacrifice everyone for the sake of the quad plot? Jack is an idiot for taking Sharon back after she slept with his brother. I hate that. Phyllis is dumb if she takes Nick back after he left her for someone else.

And Billy is everything Jack accused him of. He is a lovable screw-up who is becoming unlovable. This great love they are selling with Mac isn't doing anything to address his character flaws. The message they are sending is that he is basically a screw up if he can't have Mac. So what is his daughter supposed to do? It was almost like he doesn't even care about Delia until he remembers he needs to play daddy from time to time.

Chloe stole the show for me yesterday. EH has really made Chloe into my favorite under 30 character and I wish they would get her far away from Billy and Mac who are insufferably boring and sanctimonious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 797
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree with everything you said. I often wonder if people cheer for Sharon? I mean, it would be in the show's best interest if they made her into a strong heroine with a mind of her own instead of the same lying trouble making trash Nikki Newman alway accused her of being. I would actually like her more if she took the opportunity yesterday to walk up to Nick and Phyllis and say, "I'm pregnant with your daughter Nick, but right now Phyllis and Summer need you and you should be with them and not me." Maybe Nick would learn to man up too, but I don't think they want him to become a stronger character either. There is this sick co-dependence Nick and Sharon have with each other. Either put them back together and write them off into the sunset or keep them apart for good.

Billy is really starting to get under my skin. I really miss the "real" Billy. They need to bring that Billy back in the form of Billy Miller.

EH rocks it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, I enjoy the Scoobies and Glo-Jeff. Even I get irritated, though, when seeing them means not seeing others (I'm fixated on Nikki and Paul...but I'd add Lauren-Michael and Neil-Devon to the list, I think). In an ideal world, we could enjoy the levity and uniqueness of this story...but not at the cost of other stories. Which returns to my (redunant, sorry!) feeling that the cast must be shrunk...even if it comes with painful cost. If Lauren-Michael and Neil-Devon are now too expensive and don't inspire the writers, they should go (out of town, not recurring)...until the creative team is ready to really play them again and the budget allows it. Tyra-Ana are an obvious one, and (sadly) so are JT-Victoria-Colleen.

Underuse of cast, and the lack of cast integration (I want to see all the reaction shots...I want to see the ripples of each even wash over each 'family' member). I am definitely feeling the lack of this in the currently Summer storyline.

But, see, the fact that this line (about Billy) was scripted tells me the writers KNOW what they have done with Billy, and it is INTENTIONAL. In that case, I don't mind it, because it tells me there is a plan.

"It is always darkest before the dawn". Thus, I suspect we'll see Billy's next step as being one of "growing up". Of course, with a character like Billy, he can always back-slide (that is what makes him fun)...but I think they are setting the stage for him to get over his adolescent trauma (losing Mac), and looking at life more authentically and realistically, from the perspective of an adult.

In retrospect, I realize now that Billy and Chloe should have had a few months of tumultuous marriage before Mac came back. While that would have cost a terrific Friday cliffhanger (Mac appears at the wedding), it might have been worth it.

Again, not having Mac BE Mac...not having her integrate with Kay-Brock-Raul-Colleen-Kevin-JT on a regular basis...establishing who she is...bringing some fun to her...bringing some depth to her...is what is really killing her. Her introduction is a victim of the "pod-like" storytelling, and the fact that almost all of her potential scene partners are either recurring or backburnered or, for Kevin, "podded" in another storyline that doesn't remotely overlap.

We have been promised that July 4th will bring some of this integration, and I am delighted. But there NEEDS to be a budgetary and logistic way to do some of this EVERY WEEK.

If the Y&R team DOES monitor these boards, what they should take from it is the request to SLOW DOWN, give us more CONVERSATIONS AND MEANINGFUL MOMENTS and extended cast REACTIONS, to HAVE A SMALLER EFFECTIVE CAST that is regularly used (and the devil take the rest).

Others here want 'business stories' and "romance", but I don't give a sh!t about that. I do want to FEEL these beats more. That said, Kevin Schmidt is potential GOLD, and it is criminal that he is not in a romance that is driving us wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I hope you are right Mark but I have my doubts because I've been telling myself for months that they have a plan with Billy. Up until Mac arrived that appeared to be the case. But now I see a glimmer that the plan might actually be for Mac to save Billy and that doesn't add up for me. To tell this story at this juncture is a mishap. Billy has fathered a child. At the very least, he should be able to gain some clarity and degree of maturation for his child's sake.

They do need to find a romance for Noah but I can't think of anyone right now that he isn't related to.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh. Please don't talk sense. Because this whole quad-plus-Mary Jane thing is just CRUMBLING before my eyes.

What SENSE did the poisoning make? I cannot find the thread of logic that explains what she hoped to get out of that. Sure, it drags Phyllis away from Jack...but leaves Sharon a free agent. Now if Brad were still alive....it might have worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tom Casiello is overrated. He is just there on a temporary bases. I dont get all this love this man gets. He is the ABC version of Ron Carlivati and look where Carlivati is now. Where are the zillion posts in the OLTL thread?? Long gone because fans hate the show now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, this time I disagree. I don't want to put TC up on some pedestal. But qualitatively, his last two episodes were real standouts for me. There was some of the character-moments we are talking about wanting more of here.

I guess I don't understand the TC-hatred any more than the TC-worship. He's another writer on the show, and (in the context of a larger writing team that has some cracks exposed), he is acquitting himself very nicely.

To link this back to episodes: Beall was BORN to write for EH's Chloe! I hope they do many more Beall-Chloe episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love Victor in this episode. Can there be something juicy out of this please? Like, uh, Adam throwing Gloria into the fireplace?

And it was great to see Nina bring in Neil and for us to see the Winters' involvement in this storyline. This is the integration I'm talking about. Of course, it'd be great if something were brewing with Neil as the new CEO of Chancellor but I like this. And again, pacing would be phenomenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What is Tom Casiello known for? What are his best scripts? Didn't he write at ATWT and DAYS with Hogan Sheffer? And now at Y&R. If he takes after Sheffer then I'd rather they go with a different writer.

The way Victor speaks to Jill never fails to sour me on him. They seem to keep using her as some example of how great he is, and it just backfires for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I despise the Victor/Jill dynamic. He should be downright horrifying to everyone else but her, Jack and Katherine. I don't know where these people felt they had to right to make him impervious to so many damn people in on the show now?

But I wasn't talking about him and Jill. I was talking about him with Phyllis and with Jeffrey and Gloria. That was fun LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The scenes with Jeffrey and Gloria were deserved. The Jill scenes make me see red, probably because I think his attitude is reflecting some larger feeling towards Jill on the show's part.

He can do whatever he wants to the other two, especially Jeffrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy