Jump to content

B&B: Week of June 15th...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No, the "anyone" won't cut it. There are way too many show killers in your list.

I think the first question is, what should the show become? I'm in the minority on this one, because I want it to be a mini-Y&R. And it's not gonna be that. Moreover, if it couldn't become that with Alden and Smith on the team and Shaughnessy sometimes directing and half the Y&R cast on it...that is not its' destiny.

What should it be? That really opens the door to "Who should write it"?

In my scenario, something devastating would create two remaining axes on the show: Brooke and Katie vs. Stephanie and Felicia. Everyone else would be gone. Except maybe Bridget.

I'd do what Bill Bell did in the early 80s, which is to take the show from Forrester-Logans to something like new Family X and new Family Y. If it were me, one of those families would be the Bakers (Lt. Baker's family)...working class...live in the Valley...but with some sons and daughters with a REAL eye for fashion. I'd go back to the initial dynamics of striving vs. established wealth from the start of the show. If

is any good (I can't believe I'm typing this), maybe she could anchor the other family, and serve as the "Stephanie" of the next generation. I'd somehow link the above folks with these new families (maybe

assumes control over Forrester after Eric dies, while Brooke is the matriarch of Spectra when the dust settles).

This isn't my skill. But I really think the first thing to do is establish the vision of the show. For me, just as Y&R was Brooks and Fosters, and later became Williams and Abbotts (before Newmans), or B&B started with Logans and Forresters, I think building a new base of haves and have-nots is essential. That preserves the theme of the show, but breaks us out of this repetitive incest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I tried really hard to watch some B&B today and I ended up fast-forwarding EVERYTHING except the gameshow scenes.

My thoughts:

Rick and Steffy --> DISASTER

This should never happened. Kyle Lowder's Rick is not SexyToddSick, he reminds me of Eban Japes on Loving. Steffy is the most stupid person in L.A.

Stephanie in her PJ's telling Brooke that she can't be with Ridge. How original. Ridge and Brooke are way too old for the meddling mother storyline.

Ronn Moss can't act. We all know that. Either recast the part with a real actor, or get rid of the character. Please kill Ridge and have Stephanie and Brooke blame each other ala Jill and Kay.

B&B pretends that nobody is getting older. Thorne and Felicia want their parents back together, same for Thomas and Steffy, Stephanie treats Ridge and Brooke like teenagers, this is insane! Just because Brad Bell never managed to create an interesting character in all these years, we have to pretend that time has stopped and that the same dynamic ten or twenty years ago still does. Nobody grew up as a character, they all became crazier. This is really sad.

Brooke, my favorite character since 1987 has given birth to her son-in-law's baby, has married Ridge thousands of times -for some reasons none of the marriages were valid-, has forgotten that she was a chemist, a businesswoman, a mother and is having the same discussion about Ridge EVERY DAY for the last twenty years.

I love SF but I can't stand watching the aristocratic matriarch and owner of a fashion house looking like this. Perhaps they should recast Eric with Richard Simmons and explain that they got married because they were afraid to tell their parents they are gay.

Y&R, the number one soap takes adopts characters from this mess???

Morgan Fairchild/Lauren Koslow/Joan Collins is not the way to save this show. Marcia Cross in a one-day stint as Kimberly Shaw is. With her bomb of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I tried to erase parts of your post, but I love every word.

I did the EXACT SAME fast forwarding you did! I ONLY watched that bloody Price is Right :).

And I feel you earned "Line of the Day"

Did you see Stephanie's Mao Tse Tung outfit yesterday??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, dear Lord, not another wacko... :rolleyes: Especially not the awful Cross as the annoying and forgotten Kimberly... Thank God she is apart of another show so her introduction would be a hell for lawyers and thus impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy