Jump to content

Anthony Geary Bashes Wendy Riche's GH


Recommended Posts

  • Members

How classless.

Gloria Monty, Geary's (very late) BFF ran GH into the ground during her second tenure. And the idea of Bill Ekert or whatever his name was, was a disaster from the start.

Wendy Riche on the other hand took a show that could no longer endure the wild adventure stories of the 1980s, and made it a critically acclaimed drama with Claire Labine.

GH in the 1980s was over hyped. If the ratings for the entire year counted as opposed to just September through April, AMC would have been number one a lot longer than GH.

I believe GH only won twice for Outstanding Drama Series under Monty. It won 5 times in that same category under Riche! Clearly, it was more outstanding under Riche.

Riche is a phenomenal producer with great vision. I'm sure Guza probably encouraged Geary to say that about Riche. Regardless, Geary is just a bitter old man who IMO is a horrible actor and needs to grow up. I've never cared for Luke because I don't tolerate violence against women (or anyone else for that matter) and I truly believe GH "glamorized" rape when they created Luke and Laura. IMO, I've never been a fan. Laura on the other hand, could have always been a better heroine without Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is unfair. GH could have sustained anything it wanted, but it didn't have the people on staff to write decent action and adventure coupled with the horrible Eckarts. Wendy Riche...is she the one who had Tiffany Hill suicidal and a drug addict? If so, no thanks. GH in the 90s had a few compelling stories, but it lost everything unique about it and became like every other soap. That's the problem today, all the soaps must be alike--exactly alike---or they are deemed lesser. It won two times in the 80s and five times in the 90s? I think that speaks more to the quality of soaps in general in the 1980s and the total crap so many of soaps were serving up in the 90s. GH under Riche is clearly outstanding if "clearly outstanding" means trying your best to erase everything that made GH GH and change it into some sort of cousin of GL and Y&R or any other soap and you have stories that could be basically lifted whole and transplanted on to any other soap with just a few name changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At first I thought it had to be a joke reading what Tony Geary said about Wendy Riche. I could not believe it! I already thought he was overrated as an actor, and disagreed with many of his opinions in the past, but for him to so completely not get it and also go out of his way to trash her? Wow.

Tony Geary is Exhibit A in why I don't believe actors always know best what their characters and their shows should be like.

I don't feel bad or doubtful at all anymore for all the Geary-bashing I've done over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Loved Laura part of what I loved about her was the irony of who was to be her family by blood and marriage. The Cassadines and Spencers treated her like Gold in an ironic sense, but they criticized her at every corner. That's a part of what I loved about her. The resentment that those she loved always seemed to carry because of her

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously! It seems like Tony's on for 6 weeks max. the rest of the year he's in Amsterdam "where I can just Be Myself."

Geary has never hidden the fact that he hates soap opera and obviously had much higher goals in acting than getting stuck on Daytime. He's entitled to feel that way, even though I personally wish actors wouldn't look down their noses at the genre. After all, it is Daytime which has kept him in coke and escort-boys for 30 years.

Dissing somebody who is no longer working on GH (and hasn't for 13 -- count 'em -- years), who is no longer working in DAYTIME, though, is shitty. And no mention of Genie Francis either? I'm willing to bet one of his Emmy reels includes Laura's return to sanity and Luke being torn between Laura and Tracy. So, another classless omission.

His entire quote confirms to me what I have long suspected. GH writes not to satisfy its long-suffering audience but to please its "A-list" actors like Mo, Steve, Sarah, Laura and Tony. What a [!@#$%^&*] mess that show is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy