Jump to content

B&B: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, I kind of assumed it would be Bill/Brooke. Now, I think it will be Bill/Katie, because this week

, and I saw Katie/Bill together in a preview. For Brooke, I'm pretty sure it's gonna be

. Which is cool because...longer term...I'm pretty sure Deacon will come back. And Deacon's chemistry with

(not sexual) was off the charts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? Because I think in the next 12-18 months it's going to be Bill/Donna Bill/Brooke Bill/Katie Bill/Bridget Bill/Taylor.

/Brooke

/Katie

/Donna

/Bridget /

Taylor. Not necessarily in that order. After all, they still have to fit in many of those women doing some time with Nik/Ridge/Owen. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Might put

in spoiler tags. Just sayin'

Bill and

as lovers? Nah. Though

looked very good in lingerie.

Lemme say Brad Bell should never have fired him, but I am so delighted to be stealing

back from

!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was there supposed to be some sort of message in contrasting Jackie/Owen and Bill/Donna? Around the time the latter story starts, Jackie/Owen goes from being a hot love affair to Jackie being a pathetic old woman who has to blackmail a young stud into sex. Meanwhile, Bill is naturally such a stud (and DD is definitely a stud!) that what could be seen as sexual harassment from a man towards a younger woman is instead passed off as flirting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree. There is unfinished business with Nick. Maybe she could get involved in a triangle with Nick and

.

I'd personally like to see Brooke and Felicia spar over

.

At this point, I'd rather see Felicia have a terminal recurrence of her cancer...and enjoy six strong months of out-of-the-park storyline...than this languishing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always thought they should have done something more with Felicia and Nick but not much was done after Lesli Kay took the role. He could have been built up to be her recurring leading man much like Ridge is for Taylor and Brooke. But that didnt happen. Oh well.

I really like your idea of having Brooke and Felicia fight. It would be refreshing to see Brooke have another female to go up against besides Taylor and Stephanie. Battling Macy did wonders bc it was different. Felicia desperately needs the attention bc they only use her every few months to whine about her parents not being together

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy